Literature DB >> 22274716

Carcass quality and meat tenderness of Hawaii pasture-finished cattle and Hawaii-originated, mainland feedlot-finished cattle.

Yong Soo Kim1, Glen Kazumi Fukumoto, Sunae Kim.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the carcass quality and meat tenderness of Hawaii cattle finished on subtropical pasture with those of mainland US feedlot-finished cattle that were shipped from Hawaii after weaning. Rib-eye steak samples were collected from 30 feedlot-finished cattle harvested at a slaughter house in Washington State, USA and from 13 subtropical pasture-finished cattle harvested at a local slaughter house in Hawaii, then shipped to meat science laboratory at the University of Hawaii, Manoa. Samples were aged for 2 weeks at 4°C and frozen for later proximate analysis and meat tenderness measurement. Feedlot-finished cattle had significantly heavier carcass weight (353 vs 290 kg) and thicker backfat (13.5 vs 6.6 mm), but no significant difference was observed in rib-eye area between the two groups. Marbling score (Small) and United States Department of Agriculture quality grade (Choice) of the pasture-finished beef were not significantly (P < 0.05) different from those of feedlot-finished beef. The shear force value of pasture-finished beef (5.18 kg) was not statistically different (P < 0.05) from that of feedlot-finished beef (4.40 kg). In conclusion, results of this study suggest that Hawaii cattle finished on subtropical pasture produced as tender beef as mainland feedlot-finished cattle with less intramuscular fat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22274716     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0080-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  11 in total

1.  Meat quality of steers finished on autumn grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets.

Authors:  P French; E G O'Riordan; F J Monahan; P J Caffrey; M Vidal; M T Mooney; D J Troy; A P Moloney
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Quality of retail beef from two grass-based production systems in comparison with conventional beef.

Authors:  R H Razminowicz; M Kreuzer; M R L Scheeder
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Diet and genotype effects on the quality index of beef produced in the Argentine Pampeana region.

Authors:  N J Latimori; A M Kloster; P T García; F J Carduza; G Grigioni; N A Pensel
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Carcass and meat quality of Thai native cattle fattened on Guinea grass (Panicum maxima) or Guinea grass-legume (Stylosanthes guianensis) pastures.

Authors:  S Jaturasitha; R Norkeaw; T Vearasilp; M Wicke; M Kreuzer
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  The influence of forage diets and aging on beef palatability.

Authors:  T Jiang; J R Busboom; M L Nelson; J O'Fallon; T P Ringkob; K R Rogers-Klette; D Joos; K Piper
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Effect of pasture vs. concentrate feeding with or without antioxidants on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and quality of Uruguayan beef.

Authors:  C E Realini; S K Duckett; G W Brito; M Dalla Rizza; D De Mattos
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Effects of forage vs grain feeding on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and beef quality in Limousin-cross steers when time on feed is controlled.

Authors:  I B Mandell; J G Buchanan-Smith; C P Campbell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of pasture vs. concentrate diet on CLA isomer distribution in different tissue lipids of beef cattle.

Authors:  Dirk Dannenberger; Karin Nuernberg; Gerd Nuernberg; Nigel Scollan; Hans Steinhart; Klaus Ender
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.880

9.  Performance, carcass yield, and carcass quality characteristics of steers finished on rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata)-tropical grass pasture or concentrate.

Authors:  L L Bennett; A C Hammond; M J Williams; W E Kunkle; D D Johnson; R L Preston; M F Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability.

Authors:  L Faucitano; P Y Chouinard; J Fortin; I B Mandell; C Lafrenière; C L Girard; R Berthiaume
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  2 in total

1.  Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.

Authors:  Sarah C Klopatek; Elias Marvinney; Toni Duarte; Alissa Kendall; Xiang Crystal Yang; James W Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Comparison of different biomass methodologies to adjust sales data on veterinary antimicrobials in the USA.

Authors:  Ece Bulut; Renata Ivanek
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.790

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.