Literature DB >> 22273589

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes by initial study contact (website versus staff) for participants enrolled in a weight management study.

Kristine L Funk1, Charles R Elder, Nangel M Lindberg, Christina M Gullion, Lynn L DeBar, Gayle Meltesen, Victor J Stevens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional recruitment methods for clinical trials, such as telephone, mail, and print media, are often inefficient, costly, and use large amounts of staff time and resources.
PURPOSE: This analysis was conducted to determine whether retention, demographics, and outcomes differed between enrolled participants who responded to recruitment outreach using an Internet-based information and registration system and enrollees whose first contact was with study staff via telephone.
METHODS: We identified potentially eligible participants from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) databases and mailed brochures inviting them to participate in the Life weight loss maintenance study. We also used employee newsletters, a member-directed website, and messages to employee email distribution lists to publicize the study. All outreach methods contained both a website address and a telephone number through which respondents could register for an information session. The website contained the same information as was provided by staff over the telephone.
RESULTS: Out of 2122 potential participants who expressed interest in the study, 70% did so through the website. There was no difference in retention rates between enrollees who initiated contact through the website (WEB = 308) and enrollees who contacted the study by telephone (staff = 161). The WEB group was younger (p = 0.01), had higher income (p = 0.01) and education (p < 0.01) levels, and lower body mass index (BMI; p < 0.01). There was a trend toward greater weight loss in the WEB group (p = 0.06). LIMITATIONS: We did not conduct a formal cost analysis of the two methods. Also, the population for this analysis was mostly Caucasian and middle income; thus, we cannot draw conclusions about the generalizability of our findings to more racially and economically diverse populations.
CONCLUSION: Enrolled participants who used a website to register for an initial study information session had similar study retention and outcome performance as enrollees who used a more traditional telephone method. For larger clinical trials, a website may help researchers more efficiently and cost-effectively achieve recruitment, eligibility, and randomization goals. More research is needed to determine whether similar recruitment and retention patterns are observed among racially and economically diverse populations when these and similar methods are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273589      PMCID: PMC3489157          DOI: 10.1177/1740774511432727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.

Authors:  L M Collins; J L Schafer; C M Kam
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  Conducting clinical trials over the internet: feasibility study.

Authors:  Tim McAlindon; Margaret Formica; Karim Kabbara; Michael LaValley; Melissa Lehmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30

3.  Randomized trial of Tapas Acupressure Technique for weight loss maintenance: rationale and study design.

Authors:  Charles Elder; Cherri Gallison; Nangel M Lindberg; Lynn DeBar; Kristine Funk; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Victor J Stevens
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  Using web-based screening to enhance efficiency of HMO clinical trial recruitment in women aged forty and older.

Authors:  K Sabina Smith; Donna Eubanks; Amanda Petrik; Victor J Stevens
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Using the web for recruitment, screen, tracking, data management, and quality control in a dietary assessment clinical validation trial.

Authors:  Lenore Arab; Harry Hahn; Judith Henry; Sara Chacko; Ashley Winter; Mary C Cambou
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Elizabeth Mitchell; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Monica Kjeldstrøm; Taina Taskila; Marit Johansen; Frank Sullivan; Sue Wilson; Catherine Jackson; Ritu Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

7.  E-recruitment of patients for clinical trials.

Authors:  Alan D Smith; Dean R Manna
Journal:  Int J Electron Healthc       Date:  2005

8.  What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.

Authors:  Alison M McDonald; Rosemary C Knight; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Adrian M Grant; Jonathan A Cook; Diana R Elbourne; David Francis; Jo Garcia; Ian Roberts; Claire Snowdon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of response consistency and respective participant profiles in the Internet-based NutriNet-Santé Cohort.

Authors:  Valentina A Andreeva; Pilar Galan; Chantal Julia; Katia Castetbon; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Serge Hercberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Impact of Baseline Assessment Modality on Enrollment and Retention in a Facebook Smoking Cessation Study.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Megan A Jacobs; Grace Zawistowski; Jody Brookover; Cassandra A Stanton; Amanda L Graham
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.

Authors:  Geoff K Frampton; Jonathan Shepherd; Karen Pickett; Gareth Griffiths; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.