Literature DB >> 22273280

Activity-rest schedules in physically demanding work and the variation of responses with age.

Nadine Kakarot1, Friedrich Mueller, Claudia Bassarak.   

Abstract

Workers in physically demanding occupations require work breaks to recover from exertion. In a laboratory setting, we investigated the impact of ergometer cycling for 7 h in two conditions with an identical total break time but with two different activity-rest schedules. We hypothesised that more frequent but shorter breaks lead to less psychophysical strain and its effects than do less frequent but longer breaks, particularly for older workers. Twenty-nine participants representing three different age groups were tested in both conditions. Heart rate, perceived exertion/tension and feelings of fatigue were assessed and used as dependent variables. Results indicate no general activity-rest differences as well as no age-related differences of break effects under the condition of subjectively equal straining load. However, heart rate was found to be lower at some measurement points in the frequent-short-break condition and perceived exertion was lower in the infrequent-long-break condition. PRACTITIONER
SUMMARY: Design of activity-rest schedules in physically demanding occupations is a key issue in the prevention of strain and hence of interest to ergonomists. Our study suggests that breaks during physically demanding work have the same effect if they are frequent and short or infrequent and long, regardless of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273280     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.639906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

1.  The impact of work rest scheduling for prolonged standing activity.

Authors:  Ismail Abdul Rahman; Norlizaa Mohamad; Jafri Mohd Rohani; Raemy Md Zein
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Methods in Experimental Work Break Research: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  André Scholz; Johannes Wendsche; Argang Ghadiri; Usha Singh; Theo Peters; Stefan Schneider
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.