Literature DB >> 22273234

Cavity margin status is an independent risk factor for local-regional recurrence in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before breast-conserving surgery.

Kai Chen1, Weijuan Jia, Shunrong Li, Jianrong He, Yunjie Zeng, Hua Yang, Liang Jin, Xiayi Wu, Fengxi Su.   

Abstract

The objection of this study is to investigate whether the cavity margin (CM) status has different predictive efficacy for local-regional recurrence (LRR) in patients who have received or have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before breast-conserving surgery. We identified 61 patients who received NAC before breast-conserving surgery. A nonrandomized unmatched cohort of 295 patients without history of receiving NAC were also included in this study. Clinicopathological features and follow-up data were abstracted and analyzed. Patients in the NAC-treated group had more advanced diseases when compared with patients in the nonNAC-treated group. With a median follow-up of 42 months, the LRR-free survival rate of patients with positive CMs was significantly lower than that of patients with negative CMs in the NAC-treated group. This distinction was not observed in the nonNAC-treated group. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that positive CM was the only independent predictive factor for LRR in the NAC-treated group but not in nonNAC-treated patients. CM status had different predictive efficacy for LRR in different settings. Association between CM status and LRR was observed in NAC-treated patients rather than nonNAC-treated patients. More extensive surgical treatment might be needed in NAC-treated patients when their CMs are positive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22273234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  3 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Accurately Discriminate between No Residual Carcinoma and Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Seho Park; Jung Hyun Yoon; Joohyuk Sohn; Hyung Seok Park; Hee Jung Moon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Yu Ren; Jianjun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Predicting initial margin status in breast cancer patients during breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Zihao Pan; Liling Zhu; Qian Li; Jianguo Lai; Jingwen Peng; Fengxi Su; Shunrong Li; Kai Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.