Literature DB >> 22272990

Why not ask?: measuring patient preferences for healthcare decision making.

F Reed Johnson1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID： 22272990     DOI： 10.2165/01312067-200801040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN： 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  MSJAMA: rethinking the role of the learned intermediary: the effect of direct-to-consumer advertising on litigation.

Authors:  M P Gemperli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Medical paternalism.

Authors:  Allen Buchanan
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1978

3.  Principal/agent theory and decision making in health care.

Authors:  Allen Buchanan
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Fernando San Miguel; Mandy Ryan; Mabelle Amaya-Amaya
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Issues that May Affect the Validity and Reliability of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates in Stated-Preference Studies.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Maarten J Ijzerman; Janine A van Til; Govert J Snoek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 7.  Utility measurement in healthcare: the things I never got to.

Authors:  George W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review.

Authors:  Heather P McDonald; Amit X Garg; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Conjoint Analysis at the Individual Patient Level: Issues to Consider as We Move from a Research to a Clinical Tool.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Treatment choices, preferences and decision-making by patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Frances Chilton; Raymond A Collett
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2008-03
View more
  7 in total

1.  Patients' Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Merja Halme; Kari Linden; Kimmo Kääriä
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Reduce mortality risk above all else: a discrete-choice experiment in acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  What matters in type 2 diabetes mellitus oral treatment? A discrete choice experiment to evaluate patient preferences.

Authors:  Axel Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-12-18

4.  Treatment Preferences in Germany Differ Among Apheresis Patients with Severe Hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Andrew Sadler; Franz-Werner Dippel; Christin Juhnke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: a new patient-centered approach to the assessment of health service preferences.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Yvonne Chen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Patients' preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-08-19

7.  Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers.

Authors:  T Morel; S Aymé; D Cassiman; S Simoens; M Morgan; M Vandebroek
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.123
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.