| Literature DB >> 22272197 |
Mathew J Gregoski1, Martina Mueller, Alexey Vertegel, Aleksey Shaporev, Brenda B Jackson, Ronja M Frenzel, Sara M Sprehn, Frank A Treiber.
Abstract
Objective. Current generation smartphones' video camera technologies enable photoplethysmographic (PPG) acquisition and heart rate (HR) measurement. The study objective was to develop an Android application and compare HRs derived from a Motorola Droid to electrocardiograph (ECG) and Nonin 9560BT pulse oximeter readings during various movement-free tasks. Materials and Methods. HRs were collected simultaneously from 14 subjects, ages 20 to 58, healthy or with clinical conditions, using the 3 devices during 5-minute periods while at rest, reading aloud under observation, and playing a video game. Correlation between the 3 devices was determined, and Bland-Altman plots for all possible pairs of devices across all conditions assessed agreement. Results. Across conditions, all device pairs showed high correlations. Bland-Altman plots further revealed the Droid as a valid measure for HR acquisition. Across all conditions, the Droid compared to ECG, 95% of the data points (differences between devices) fell within the limits of agreement. Conclusion. The Android application provides valid HRs at varying levels of movement free mental/perceptual motor exertion. Lack of electrode patches or wireless sensor telemetric straps make it advantageous for use in mobile-cell-phone-delivered health promotion and wellness programs. Further validation is needed to determine its applicability while engaging in physical movement-related activities.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22272197 PMCID: PMC3261476 DOI: 10.1155/2012/696324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Telemed Appl ISSN: 1687-6415
Descriptive Characteristics of Sample.
| Sex | Race/Ethnicity | Age | Weight (Ib) | Height (in) | Chronic Disease/Medication(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | NHW | 49 | 160 | 67.5 | |
| M | NHW | 57 | 188 | 73 | EH, HC; Zocor, Propanol |
| M | NHW | 33 | 162.6 | 68.25 | Adderall |
| F | NHW | 20 | 116.1 | 63 | |
| F | NHW | 22 | 120 | 63 | |
| F | NHW | 59 | 144.4 | 63.75 | |
| F | NHAA | 43 | 320.2 | 61.25 | |
| M | HW | 32 | 177 | 73.25 | HC, statin |
| F | NHAA | 22 | 185 | 60 | |
| F | HW | 47 | 260.6 | 65.25 | EH; |
| F | HW | 18 | 145.4 | 65.25 | |
| F | NHAA | 58 | 182 | 62.75 | |
| F | NHAA | 32 | 178.2 | 65.25 | |
| F | NHAA | 42 | 118.5 | 62.5 | |
| M/F | NHW/NHAA/HW | 38.1 | 175.6 | 65.3 | Avg |
| 14.6 | 53.4 | 3.9 | Stddev |
F: female; M: male; NHW: non-Hispanic White; NHAA: non-Hispanic African American; HW: hispanic White; EH: essential hypertension; HC: hypercholesterolemia.
Figure 1Placement of index finger with Droid device.
Figure 2Placement of Droid and Nonin devices during data acquisition.
Heart rate means and SD across conditions and devices.
| Device | Sitting | Reading | Video game | All conditions (average) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioZ-ECG (bpm) | 72.47 ± 12.89 | 77.39 ± 12.65 | 74.29 ± 11.93 | 74.72 ± 12.34 |
| Droid (bpm) | 71.94 ± 12.98 | 76.78 ± 12.51 | 74.10 ± 11.78 | 74.27 ± 12.27 |
| Nonin (bpm) | 72.86 ± 13.01 | 77.36 ± 12.79 | 75.09 ± 11.87 | 75.10 ± 12.73 |
Correlations and SEE for the different conditions.
| Condition | ECG versus Droid | Droid versus Nonin | ECG versus Nonin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sitting |
| .99 | .99 | .99 |
|
| ||||
| Reading |
| .99 | .99 | .99 |
|
| ||||
| Video game |
| .99 | .99 | .99 |
Figure 3Bland-Altman plots comparing agreement between Droid, Nonin, and ECG at three activities.