| Literature DB >> 22272108 |
Uzma Mahmood1, Sitara Rashid, S Ishrat Ali, Rasheeda Parveen, Nida Ambreen, Khalid Mohammed Khan, Shahnaz Perveen, Wolfgang Voelter.
Abstract
Cellulose fiber is a tremendous natural resource that has broad application in various productions including the textile industry. The dyes, which are commonly used for cellulose printing, are "reactive dyes" because of their high wet fastness and brilliant colors. The interaction of various dyes with the cellulose fiber depends upon the physiochemical properties that are governed by specific features of the dye molecule. The binding pattern of the reactive dye with cellulose fiber is called the ligand-receptor concept. In the current study, the three dimensional quantitative structure property relationship (3D-QSPR) technique was applied to understand the red reactive dyes interactions with the cellulose by the Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) method. This method was successfully utilized to predict a reliable model. The predicted model gives satisfactory statistical results and in the light of these, it was further analyzed. Additionally, the graphical outcomes (contour maps) help us to understand the modification pattern and to correlate the structural changes with respect to the absorptivity. Furthermore, the final selected model has potential to assist in understanding the characteristics of the external test set. The study could be helpful to design new reactive dyes with better affinity and selectivity for the cellulose fiber.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-QSPR; CoMFA; cellulose fiber; red reactive dye
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22272108 PMCID: PMC3257105 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12128862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1General mechanism of the reactive dye-cellulose interaction.
Red reactive dye structures and their absorbtivities (dm3/mol/cm × 104).
| S. No. | Dye Code | Group “A “ | Bridging Moiety “DA” | Absorbtivity dm3/mol/cm × 104 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JP-1 | Anthranilic acid | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 3.47 |
| 2 | JP-2 | Anthranilic acid | 1,2-Phenylenediamine | 5.37 |
| 3 | JP-3 | Anthranilic acid | 1,3 - Phenylen diamine | 5.30 |
| 4 | JP-4 | Anthranilic acid | Diaminestilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | 4.29 |
| 5 | JP-5 | Anthranilic acid | 4,4′-Diaminebenzoanilide | 3.74 |
| 6 | JP-6 | Anthranilic acid | Ethylene-1,2-diamine | 4.94 |
| 7 | JP-7 | 4- | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 5.43 |
| 8 | JP-8 | 4- | 1,2-Phenylenediamine | 6.21 |
| 9 | JP-9 | 4- | 1,3-Phenylenediamine | 5.81 |
| 10 | JP-10 | 4- | Diaminestilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | 5.49 |
| 11 | JP-11 | 4- | 4,4′-diaminebenzoanilide | 4.95 |
| 12 | JP-12 | 4- | Ethylene-1,2-diamine | 6.32 |
| 13 | JP-13 | Anrthanilic acid | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 4.67 |
| 14 | IS-14 | Aniline | Diaminestilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | 2.95 |
| 15 | IS-15 | Benzene-m-aminosulfonic acid | Diaminestilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | 1.85 |
| 16 | IS-16 | Benzene-m-aminosulfonic acid | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 0.71 |
| 17 | IS-17 | Benzene-p-aminosulfonic acid | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 1.95 |
| 18 | IS-18 | Aniline | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 0.37 |
| 19 | IS-19 | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 0.25 | |
| 20 | IS-20 | p-Toluidine | Diaminestilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | 1.92 |
| 21 | IS-21 | 1,3-Phenylenediamine | 0.47 | |
| 22 | IS-22 | 1,4-Phenylenediamine | 2.44 | |
| 23 | IS-23 | 1,3 - Phenylenediamine | 1.74 | |
| 24 | IS-24 | 1,4 - Phenylenediamine | 0.47 | |
| 25 | IS-25 | 1,3-Phenylenediamine | 1.40 | |
| 26 | IS-26 | Diaminestilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | 2.32 | |
Figure 2Work Flow Scheme for CoMFA Modeling.
Figure 3The most active dye molecule JP-12 is used as a template and the selected atom involved in the alignment is shown by the asteric (*).
Figure 4Structural alignment of all red reactive dyes by the database alignment method using the most active compound JP-12 as template.
Actual and predicted absorbtivity of red reactive dyes of training and test sets.
| Compounds | Experimental absorbtivity | Predicted absorbtivity by CoMFA |
|---|---|---|
| JP-02 | 5.37 | 5.38 |
| JP-03 | 5.30 | 5.46 |
| JP-04 | 4.29 | 4.18 |
| JP-05 | 3.74 | 3.67 |
| JP-06 | 4.94 | 4.91 |
| JP-07 | 5.43 | 5.66 |
| JP-08 | 6.21 | 6.24 |
| JP-09 | 5.81 | 5.85 |
| JP-10 | 5.49 | 5.37 |
| JP-12 | 6.32 | 6.51 |
| JP-13 | 4.67 | 4.35 |
| IS-14 | 2.95 | 2.52 |
| IS-15 | 1.85 | 1.95 |
| IS-16 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| IS-17 | 1.95 | 2.02 |
| IS-18 | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| IS-19 | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| IS-20 | 1.92 | 1.35 |
| IS-22 | 0.47 | 0.75 |
| IS-23 | 2.44 | 2.41 |
| IS-24 | 0.47 | 1.08 |
| IS-25 | 1.4 | 1.39 |
| JP-01 | 3.47 | 5.40 |
| JP-11 | 4.95 | 4.37 |
| IS-21 | 0.47 | 2.18 |
Statistical results for red reactive dyes extracted by CoMFA analysis.
| Parameters | CoMFA |
|---|---|
| 0.509 | |
| 03 | |
| 1.567 | |
| 0.257 | |
| 591.27 | |
| 0.989 | |
| 0.797 | |
| Steric | 49.7 |
| Electrostatic | 50.3 |
Cross-validated correlation coefficient (q2);
Optimum number of components (ONC);
Standard error of prediction (SEP);
Standard error of estimate (SEE);
Conventional correlation coefficient (r2);
Correlation coefficient (r2 pred).
Figure 5(a) CoMFA stDev*Coeff contour map based on the most active compound JP-12 (Graphical representation of compound is displayed in sticks, carbon atom in gray with default elemental color). Steric fields: Favored for bulky groups (green) and disfavored for bulky group (yellow); (b) CoMFA stDev*Coeff contour map based on the most active compound JP-12 (Graphical representation of the compound is displayed in sticks, carbon atom in gray with default elemental color). Electrostatic fields: Favored for negative group (red) and disfavored for negative group (blue).