In order to evaluate the effects of hyperthermia on adriamycin cardiomyopathy and its relationship with heat shock protein induction and myosin accumulation, female Sprague-Dawley rats (21-24 days) were randomized into four groups: the control, adriamycin, temperature and temperature-adriamycin groups. Adriamycin was injected i.v. at a dose of 27 mg/Kg (0.1 ml). The rats were exposed to a temperature of 45ºC for 35 min, followed by a recovery (1 h) at room temperature prior to adriamycin treatment. Body weight was recorded weekly. The thickness of the ventricular wall and percentage of cellular damage were biometrically and ultrastructurally evaluated, respectively. Heat shock protein 25 and myosin accumulation were determined through Western blot analysis. The determinations were carried out monthly until the third month after treatment. At eight and twelve weeks after treatment, the thickness of the ventricular wall seemed to decrease in the adriamycin-treated rats in relation to the other groups. An electron microscopic analysis of the adriamycin group's left ventricular wall samples, showed more sarcomeric changes and loss of myofibrils than the control, temperature and temperature-adriamycin groups. At 24 hours after treatment with adriamycin, higher levels of heat shock protein 25 and myosin were observed (week 0) in the temperature-adriamycin group than in the control and adriamycin groups (4, 8 and 12 weeks). Hyperthermia was confirmed by a multivariate approach to induce heat shock protein 25 and myosin, which would strengthen cardiac-sarcomeric myosin arrangement.
In order to evaluate the effects of hyperthermia on adriamycincardiomyopathy and its relationship with heat shock protein induction and myosin accumulation, female Sprague-Dawley rats (21-24 days) were randomized into four groups: the control, adriamycin, temperature and temperature-adriamycin groups. Adriamycin was injected i.v. at a dose of 27 mg/Kg (0.1 ml). The rats were exposed to a temperature of 45ºC for 35 min, followed by a recovery (1 h) at room temperature prior to adriamycin treatment. Body weight was recorded weekly. The thickness of the ventricular wall and percentage of cellular damage were biometrically and ultrastructurally evaluated, respectively. Heat shock protein 25 and myosin accumulation were determined through Western blot analysis. The determinations were carried out monthly until the third month after treatment. At eight and twelve weeks after treatment, the thickness of the ventricular wall seemed to decrease in the adriamycin-treated rats in relation to the other groups. An electron microscopic analysis of the adriamycin group's left ventricular wall samples, showed more sarcomeric changes and loss of myofibrils than the control, temperature and temperature-adriamycin groups. At 24 hours after treatment with adriamycin, higher levels of heat shock protein 25 and myosin were observed (week 0) in the temperature-adriamycin group than in the control and adriamycin groups (4, 8 and 12 weeks). Hyperthermia was confirmed by a multivariate approach to induce heat shock protein 25 and myosin, which would strengthen cardiac-sarcomeric myosin arrangement.
Entities:
Keywords:
adriamycin cardiomyopathy; cellular damage; heat shock protein 25; hyperthermia; left ventricular wall thickness; myosin
The clinical efficacy of the antitumor antibiotic drug adriamycin is severely limited
by its cardiotoxic effects
,
. In an experimental rat model of cardiomyopathy, this potent cardiotoxin
causes a significant reduction in body weight, left ventricular wall thickness and
heat shock protein 70 and 25 (Hsp70, Hsp25) accumulations
. Moreover, the ventricular action potential duration is significantly
shortened in the presence of adriamycin, while the incidence of ventricular
fibrillation is significantly enhanced
. All this, as well as serious degenerations at the subcellular level, have
previously been demonstrated
.In this regard, selective inhibition of cardiac muscle gene expression is among the
earliest events in adriamycincardiotoxicity, which may lead to mostly irreversible
and sometimes fatal cardiomyopathy in patients treated with adriamycin
,
. Furthermore, rats injected with adriamycin showed a dose-dependent decrease
in the levels of mRNAs for alpha-actin, troponin I, myosin light chain 2 and M
isoform of creatine kinase in cardiac muscles. These selective changes in gene
expression in cardiocyte cultures and cardiac muscles precede classical
ultrastructural changes and may explain the myofibrillar loss that characterizes
adriamycincardiac injury
. In this sense, different cardioprotective strategies have been evaluated,
including L-carnitine, which reduces the severity of late adriamycincardiomyopathy,
by promoting the induction of Hsp25
.Heat stress is associated with the induction of heat shock proteins (Hsps), which in
turn modulates cellular survival or death
. In vitro results show that heat shock induced-Hsp27 can protect against
adriamycin induced toxicity in cardiac H9c2 cells
. The depletion of Hsp27 in cardiac H9c2 cells by small interfering siRNA
also reduced the viability against adriamycin, confirming that Hsp27 does protect
cardiac cells against adriamycin-induced toxicity
. Transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of Hsp27 attenuate
adriamycin-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice
. The overexpression of Hsp20 inhibits adriamycin triggered cardiac injury
possibly dependent on Akt kinase activation and the attenuation of oxidative
stress
. However, important issues still remain unresolved including, the biological
role of Hsp25 in structural cardiac organization in vivo during short and long term
adriamycin intoxication and its relationship with myosin accumulation as a potential
molecular event associated with cardiac protection induced by thermal stress. In
this work, our aim was to evaluate the effect of hyperthermia in
vivo by using an animal experimental model of adriamycin-induced very
late cardiotoxicity set up with differences in mortality, body weight, ventricular
wall thickness, cellular damage, Hsp25 and myosin accumulation among control and
treated animals at 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=80) at approximately 21–24 days of age and weighing
40–60 g were obtained from the Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones
Científicas (Caracas, Venezuela). The rats were allowed free access to standard
diet and water ad libitum at room temperature, which was 23ºC. The animals were
kept according to the norms specified in the “Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals” of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH publication
No. 85–23, revised 1996) and related ethical regulations of the Universidad
Central de Venezuela, Instituto de Medicina Tropical.
Materials
The adriamycin was purchased from Badan (Caracas, Venezuela). All biochemical
compounds and monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO, USA). The compounds for structural and ultrastructural studies were
purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA, USA).Heat stress and drug administration protocol. The animals were
randomized into the followings four groups (n=20 each group): the
control (Control), Adriamycin (Adr), Temperature (Temp) and
Temperature-Adriamycin (Temp-Adr) groups. The rats of the control group
were injected with sterile water (0.1 ml i.v; H2O; arrow).
Adriamycin was injected i.v. in three sub-doses of 9 mg/kg body
weight/0.1 ml/day (Adr; dashed arrow) applied at 3-day intervals to a
cumulative dose of 27 mg/kg body weight. The Temp-Adr group rats were
exposed to a temperature of 45ºC for 35 min (HS; arrowhead) prior to
adriamycin treatment and allowed to recover at 23ºC for 1 h. At 24 hours
after the third adriamycin sub-dose 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after
treatment, the hearts of the rats were removed (R; downwards arrow) for
biometric, ultrastructural and biochemical studies.
Adriamycin treatment
The animals were randomized into the following four groups (n=20 each): the
control (Control), adriamycin (Adr), temperature (Temp) and
temperature-adriamycin (Temp-Adr) groups. The drug was injected i.v. in the
caudal vein to a cumulative dose of 27 mg/kg body weight, divided into three
sub-doses of 9 mg/kg body weight/ 0.1ml/day applied at 3-day intervals. Each of
the Control group rats was injected i.v. with 0.1 ml of sterile water, following
the pattern protocol described in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Heat stress and drug administration protocol. The animals were
randomized into the followings four groups (n=20 each group): the
control (Control), Adriamycin (Adr), Temperature (Temp) and
Temperature-Adriamycin (Temp-Adr) groups. The rats of the control group
were injected with sterile water (0.1 ml i.v; H2O; arrow).
Adriamycin was injected i.v. in three sub-doses of 9 mg/kg body
weight/0.1 ml/day (Adr; dashed arrow) applied at 3-day intervals to a
cumulative dose of 27 mg/kg body weight. The Temp-Adr group rats were
exposed to a temperature of 45ºC for 35 min (HS; arrowhead) prior to
adriamycin treatment and allowed to recover at 23ºC for 1 h. At 24 hours
after the third adriamycin sub-dose 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after
treatment, the hearts of the rats were removed (R; downwards arrow) for
biometric, ultrastructural and biochemical studies.
Thermal stress
Much of the existing data regarding Hsp responses to stress fails to exclude the
potential acute effects of anesthetic agents used in experimental protocols
and the effects of immunomodulators on anti-Hsp antibodies
. Temp-Adr group rats were exposed to a temperature of 45ºC for 35 min
prior to adriamycin treatment, without anesthesia, in a padded wooden cage with
thermal and humidity controls, after which they were allowed to recover at 23ºC
for 1h; a similar method has already been reported
. Finally, 24 hours after the third adriamycin sub-dose at weeks 0 and 4,
8, and 12 after treatment, the rats’ hearts were removed for biometric,
ultrastructural and biochemical studies (Fig.
1) .
Biometric study
Paraffin-embedded hearts were sectioned at 4-μm intervals and
stained with H&E. The sectioned free left ventricular walls were examined by
light microscopy and drawn with an adapted camera lucida. The
thicknesses of the free left ventricular walls were determined by means of
SigmaScan image analysis software.
Ultrastructural study
Left ventricular free wall samples were first fixed with Karnovsky’s fixative
(320 mosmol pH 7.4 for 2 h at 4ºC), then post-fixed in osmic acid (0.12 M 2%
osmium tetroxide, 320 mosmol, pH 7.4, for 2 h at 4ºC), dissolved in a phosphate
buffer (1 h at room temperature) and then dehydrated in acetone (50%, 70%, 80%,
95% and 100%; 30 min each). Finally, they were embedded in polymerizing epoxy
resin. After embedding, thin sections were cut, stained with saturated uranyl
acetate (5 min) and lead citrate (3 min) and examined with a transmission
electron microscope (Hitachi 300, 75 kV).
Cellular damage
The percentage of cellular damage was interpreted following a semi-quantitative
scoring cytogram system. Values ranging from 0–4 were assigned to four cellular
damage zones observed in each grid (3 grids) for all experimental groups. In
addition, 6 ultrastructural variables were taken into consideration (nucleus,
contractile apparatus, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, membranes,
extracellular findings). After observation (× 6300), the 100% level of damage
was related to a maximal theoretical value of 72 (4 damage zones × 3 grids × 6
ultrastructural variables)
.
Western blot analysis
Free left wall ventricular tissue was homogenized (4ºC; 1 ml extraction buffer,
Tris-HCl 20 mM, EDTA 2 mM, PMSF 1 mM, pH 7.4) using a Potter-Elvehjem tissue
grinder. The samples were centrifuged (14000 RPM/10 min), and the pellet was
discarded. The Hsp25 and myosin content in the supernatant of the homogenized
heart tissue was determined by Western blot analysis. Protein samples were
diluted with a 4 × Laemmli buffer solution. Equal amounts of protein samples (20
μg per lane) were applied to 10% polyacrylamide gels and
separated by SDS-PAGE in duplicated gels using a Bio-Rad Mini-Gel system. One
gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 to confirm the equivalence
of loading concentrations and the adequacy of the sample preparation, while the
second gel was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and stained with Ponceau
Red before recognizing Hsp25 and myosin. Then, the membranes were washed in PBS
(pH 7.4), 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% fat free milk to block non-specific binding sites
and incubated with mouse monoclonal IgG against Hsp25 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO,
USA; clone IAP-28) or myosin smooth muscle (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; clone
hSM-V) in a 1:500 dilution. After washing, a secondary antibody was used. The
protein bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate and
exposed to films. The relative levels of the protein bands were determined with
the use of optical densitometry (GS-800 densitometer and the Quantity One
Program; Bio-Rad).Cumulative mortality during the experimental period for all groups. An
increase in mortality was observed in the Adr group (75%) in contrast to
the results of the Control, Temp and Temp-Adrrats, which showed 0, 0
and 30% mortality, respectively. The column corresponds to the mean
cumulative mortality, and the whisker corresponds to the standard error.
ANOVA and the Duncan post hoc test showed significance differences among
groups (p<0.05).
Statistical analysis
A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was undertaken to evaluate the similarities
among the media of all the variables included in this study
. The Duncan’s post hoc test (or multiple comparison test) can be used to
determine the significant differences between group means in an ANOVA setting
and is based on range statistics
. Statistically significant differences from the control and Adr groups
are indicated with a dagger and double dagger respectively in Figs 2
, 3
, 4
, 7 and 8.
Fig. 2
Cumulative mortality during the experimental period for all groups. An
increase in mortality was observed in the Adr group (75%) in contrast to
the results of the Control, Temp and Temp-Adr rats, which showed 0, 0
and 30% mortality, respectively. The column corresponds to the mean
cumulative mortality, and the whisker corresponds to the standard error.
ANOVA and the Duncan post hoc test showed significance differences among
groups (p<0.05).
Fig. 3
Weight gain during the experimental period. Adriamycin caused a
significant reduction in body weight from week 4 compared with the
Control and Temp groups. The Temp-Adr group experienced a decrease in
body weight from week 4 until week 12. The Control, Adr, Temp and
Temp-Adr rats are indicated by empty squares, empty diamonds, empty
triangles and full circles, respectively. Values are shown as the means
± standard errors. ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test showed significance
differences among groups (p<0.05). Statistically significant
differences compared with the control and Adr groups are indicated with
a dagger and double-dagger, respectively.
Fig. 4
Left ventricular wall thickness. The wall thickness reduction in the Adr
group seems to be bigger than that in the Temp-Adr group at 8 and 12
weeks. The Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr groups are indicated by white
columns, black columns, dotted columns and slashed columns,
respectively. Values are shown as the means ± standard errors. ANOVA and
Duncan post hoc test showed significance differences among groups
(p<0.05). Statistically significant differences compared with the
control and Adr groups are indicated with a dagger and double-dagger,
respectively.
Fig. 7
Cellular damage of left ventricular wall cardiac tissue. The Adr group
showed the highest percentage of cellular damage in contrast to the
Temp-Adr samples, which had the least cellular damage (8 and 12 weeks).
The percentage of cellular damage was interpreted following a
semi-quantitative scoring cytogram system. Values ranging from 0–4 were
assigned to cellular damage zones for all four groups. The 100% level of
damage was related to the maximal theoretical value of 72. The Control,
Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr groups are indicated by white columns, black
columns, dotted columns and slashed columns, respectively. Values are
shown as the means ± standard errors. ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test
showed significance differences among groups (p<0.05). Statistically
significant differences compared with the control and Adr groups are
indicated with a dagger and double-dagger, respectively.
Fig. 8
Western blot analysis of Hsp25 and myosin accumulation. In the Adr
group, two bands were recognized by the anti-Hsp25 antibody at 0 and 8
weeks after treatment. The Temp-Adr group had the densest band
recognized by the same antibody (week 0) (A). Consistent which the
highest accumulation of Hsp25, myosin also had its densest band in the
Temp-Adr-treated group at 0 week. This result was similar to that in the
Control group at 4 weeks and to that of the Temp group at week 0. Myosin
accumulation decreased more in both Adr-treated groups from week 8 (B).
The Western blot analysis is shown above the densitometric analysis. The
Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr groups are indicated by white columns,
black columns, dotted columns and slashed columns, respectively. Values
are shown as means ± standard error. ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test
showed significance differences among groups (p<0.05). Statistically
significant differences compared with the Control and Adr groups are
indicated with a dagger and double-dagger, respectively.
The values showed in the Cartesian and bar graphs are expressed as standard
errors of the mean. In addition, the statistical analysis of the data generated
was also evaluated with a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) because of the
multivariate condition of the experimental design. PCA describes the data
behavior of the 4 groups, Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr, at the times studied
(0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks) as a function of the analyzed variables (mortality, body
weight, left ventricular wall thickness, cell damage, Hsp25 OD/mm2
and myosin OD/mm2) in a single rectangular Cartesian plane (biplot).
The PCA was computed with the Multivariate Statistical Package (MVSP). The data
generated was interpreted biologically
. The expected probability was fitted to p<0.05.
Results
Mortality
In the Adr group, the cumulative mortality reached 75%, in contrast to the
Control, Temp and Temp-Adr groups, where 0, 0 and 30% mortality was detected,
respectively (Fig. 2).Weight gain during the experimental period. Adriamycin caused a
significant reduction in body weight from week 4 compared with the
Control and Temp groups. The Temp-Adr group experienced a decrease in
body weight from week 4 until week 12. The Control, Adr, Temp and
Temp-Adrrats are indicated by empty squares, empty diamonds, empty
triangles and full circles, respectively. Values are shown as the means
± standard errors. ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test showed significance
differences among groups (p<0.05). Statistically significant
differences compared with the control and Adr groups are indicated with
a dagger and double-dagger, respectively.Left ventricular wall thickness. The wall thickness reduction in the Adr
group seems to be bigger than that in the Temp-Adr group at 8 and 12
weeks. The Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr groups are indicated by white
columns, black columns, dotted columns and slashed columns,
respectively. Values are shown as the means ± standard errors. ANOVA and
Duncan post hoc test showed significance differences among groups
(p<0.05). Statistically significant differences compared with the
control and Adr groups are indicated with a dagger and double-dagger,
respectively.
Body weight
The drug applied to the Adr group caused a significant reduction in body weight
from week 4 compared with the Control group, which showed continuous weight gain
throughout the experiment. The animals exposed to hyperthermia before treatment
had a lower weight gain at weeks 4 and 12 compared with the Control rats. The
Temp-Adr group experienced a decrease in body weight after week 4 until week 12
(Fig. 3).The Adr and Temp-Adr groups experienced a reduction in the thickness of the left
ventricular wall from week 8 to week 12 compared with the Control and Temp
groups, respectively. The reduction for the Adr group seems to be bigger than
that for the Temp-Adr group, both at 8 and 12 weeks. Nevertheless, no
significant differences in left ventricular wall thickness were observed in the
Control and Adr groups between 0 and 4 weeks after the beginning of the
adriamycin treatment (Fig. 4).Electron photomicrographs of free left wall ventricular cardiac tissue
at 0 and 4 weeks after treatment. Cardiac tissue showed normal
appearances in all four groups at 0 week (A–D). A small number of
sarcomeric and mitochondria alterations and the presence of vacuoles and
lipid droplets were observed in the Adr and Temp-Adr samples compared
with the Control and Temp samples at 4 weeks (E–H) after treatment.
Images A and E, B and F, C and G and D and H are of Control, Adr, Temp
and Temp-Adr tissues, respectively (magnification, ×6280; scale bar=2.3
μm; taken with 75 kV).Electron photomicrographs of left ventricular wall cardiac tissue at 8
and 12 weeks after treatment. Myofibrillar disarrangement, abundant
intermyofibrillar spaces and disassembly, rupture and loss of myofibrils
were observed in the Adr and Temp-Adr samples in contrast to the Control
and Temp samples, which had normal patterns of cardiac tissue. The Adr
group alterations seemed to be larger than those of the Temp-Adr group
both at 8 and 12 weeks after treatment. Images A and E, B and F, C and G
and D and H are of Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr tissues, respectively
(magnification, ×6280; scale bar=2.3 μm; taken with 75
kV).In week 0 (Fig. 5 A–D), the left ventricular
cardiac wall tissue samples from the Control (A), Adr (B), Temp (C) and Temp-Adr
(D) groups all showed normal appearances. Four weeks after treatment (Fig. 5, E–H), a few changes were observed in
the samples from the Adr (F) and Temp-Adr (H) groups including sarcomeric and
mitochondrial modifications and the presence of vacuoles and lipid droplets, in
contrast to the samples from Control (E) and Temp (G) groups. In addition, at 8
(Fig. 6 A–D) and 12 weeks (Fig. 6 E–H) after treatment, the Adr (B, F)
and Temp-Adr (D, H) tissue samples showed a diffuse disarray of myofibrils and
an abnormal pattern of the bands in the sarcomere, disorganization in the
contractile element, degeneration of fibers and loss of the characteristic
sarcomeric structure, giving the appearance of a lax tissue, as well as the
presence of a significant perinuclear edema and a perinuclear cistern exhibiting
invaginations over its whole arrangement.
Fig. 5
Electron photomicrographs of free left wall ventricular cardiac tissue
at 0 and 4 weeks after treatment. Cardiac tissue showed normal
appearances in all four groups at 0 week (A–D). A small number of
sarcomeric and mitochondria alterations and the presence of vacuoles and
lipid droplets were observed in the Adr and Temp-Adr samples compared
with the Control and Temp samples at 4 weeks (E–H) after treatment.
Images A and E, B and F, C and G and D and H are of Control, Adr, Temp
and Temp-Adr tissues, respectively (magnification, ×6280; scale bar=2.3
μm; taken with 75 kV).
Fig. 6
Electron photomicrographs of left ventricular wall cardiac tissue at 8
and 12 weeks after treatment. Myofibrillar disarrangement, abundant
intermyofibrillar spaces and disassembly, rupture and loss of myofibrils
were observed in the Adr and Temp-Adr samples in contrast to the Control
and Temp samples, which had normal patterns of cardiac tissue. The Adr
group alterations seemed to be larger than those of the Temp-Adr group
both at 8 and 12 weeks after treatment. Images A and E, B and F, C and G
and D and H are of Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr tissues, respectively
(magnification, ×6280; scale bar=2.3 μm; taken with 75
kV).
Cellular damage of left ventricular wall cardiac tissue. The Adr group
showed the highest percentage of cellular damage in contrast to the
Temp-Adr samples, which had the least cellular damage (8 and 12 weeks).
The percentage of cellular damage was interpreted following a
semi-quantitative scoring cytogram system. Values ranging from 0–4 were
assigned to cellular damage zones for all four groups. The 100% level of
damage was related to the maximal theoretical value of 72. The Control,
Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr groups are indicated by white columns, black
columns, dotted columns and slashed columns, respectively. Values are
shown as the means ± standard errors. ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test
showed significance differences among groups (p<0.05). Statistically
significant differences compared with the control and Adr groups are
indicated with a dagger and double-dagger, respectively.The resulting damage for each condition was expressed as a percentage of the
maximal theoretical damage (Fig. 7). The
Adr group showed the highest percentage of cellular damage in contrast to the
samples from the Temp-Adr group, which had less cellular damage (8 and 12
weeks). However, the smallest amounts of damage were clearly observed in the
Control and Temp groups.Western blot analysis of Hsp25 and myosin accumulation. In the Adr
group, two bands were recognized by the anti-Hsp25 antibody at 0 and 8
weeks after treatment. The Temp-Adr group had the densest band
recognized by the same antibody (week 0) (A). Consistent which the
highest accumulation of Hsp25, myosin also had its densest band in the
Temp-Adr-treated group at 0 week. This result was similar to that in the
Control group at 4 weeks and to that of the Temp group at week 0. Myosin
accumulation decreased more in both Adr-treated groups from week 8 (B).
The Western blot analysis is shown above the densitometric analysis. The
Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr groups are indicated by white columns,
black columns, dotted columns and slashed columns, respectively. Values
are shown as means ± standard error. ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test
showed significance differences among groups (p<0.05). Statistically
significant differences compared with the Control and Adr groups are
indicated with a dagger and double-dagger, respectively.Compared with the Control group, the Adr group showed a notable increase in Hsp25
accumulation. Two bands in particular were recognized by the anti-Hsp25
antibody, corresponding to weeks 0 and 8 after adriamycin treatment. In
contrast, the Temp-Adr group revealed the densest band recognized by the same
antibody corresponding to week 0. Hsp25 was also recognized in the Temp
group, especially at 0 and 8 weeks (Fig. 8A). Consistent with the highest accumulation of Hsp25,
myosin also had its densest band in the Temp-Adr treated group at 0 week. This
result was similar to that of the Temp group (0 week). However, the highest
value of myosin was seen in the control group at week 4 as a result of the
normal growth of the rats in this group. Myosin accumulation decreased more in
both Adr treated groups from week 8. (Fig.
8B).Cartesian representation of the Principal Components Analysis. Mortality
and cell damage were directly correlated, while Hsp25, left ventricular
wall thickness and myosin autovectors pointed in the opposite direction.
Mortality and cell damage were antipodal variables for myosin. Each
symbol is associated with a number (representing time in weeks) and a
letter (symbolizing the groups). The Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr
groups are indicated by filled triangles, filled squares, filled circles
and filled diamonds, respectively. The arrowed lines correspond to
autovectors; each autovector matches with a variable (mortality, body
weight, left ventricular wall thickness, cell damage, myosin and Hsp25
accumulation).The ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test showed the differences among variables with
p<0.05 in each of the analyzed variables. The PCA biplot represented the
influence of each variable in a vectorial manner referred to as autovectors
(Fig. 9). The autovectors indicated the
direction and meaning of change in each variable. Autovectors pointing in the
same direction correlated directly in the PCA model together with a similar
change in the variables. Mortality and cell damage were clear examples. On the
other hand, autovectors pointing in opposite directions were inversely
correlated. Mortality and cell damage were found to be antipodal variables for
myosin expression. Body weight and left ventricle wall thickness were diametric
variables, since the body weight loss was associated conversely with a reduction
in the thickness of the left ventricle wall. The PCA model also quantitatively
demonstrated that at the beginning of the experiments (0 weeks) there was a high
Hsp25 accumulation and not much increase in body weight. From 4 to 12 weeks, the
Hsp25 accumulation diminished and body weight increased.
Fig. 9
Cartesian representation of the Principal Components Analysis. Mortality
and cell damage were directly correlated, while Hsp25, left ventricular
wall thickness and myosin autovectors pointed in the opposite direction.
Mortality and cell damage were antipodal variables for myosin. Each
symbol is associated with a number (representing time in weeks) and a
letter (symbolizing the groups). The Control, Adr, Temp and Temp-Adr
groups are indicated by filled triangles, filled squares, filled circles
and filled diamonds, respectively. The arrowed lines correspond to
autovectors; each autovector matches with a variable (mortality, body
weight, left ventricular wall thickness, cell damage, myosin and Hsp25
accumulation).
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that heat stress preconditioning of adriamycin-treated
rats led to a remarkable increase in Hsp25 accumulation. This first cellular
response was directly linked to an increase of myosin in addition to fewer cardiac
subcellular toxic injuries. Stress response involves the rapid and transient
increase in a specific set of Hsps
, and in this sense, protein transcription and translation are halted,
presumably to alleviate the burden of misfolded proteins in the cell
. Although Hsp25 was induced by hyperthermia, we did not compare the Hsp25
accumulation to others Hsps. However, our observations could not exclude the role of
others Hsps because, for example, overexpression of Hsp27 in the human heart
upregulated both Hsp32 and Hsp70 expression in response to adriamycin treatment
. In this regard, mice deficient in alpha-B-crystallin and HspB2 (two small
Hsps related to Hsp25) show decreased total glutathione levels in the heart and
increased susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion-induced damage, whereas mice
overexpressing alpha-B-crystallin show increased resistance against
ischemia-reperfusion
. Increased expression of Hsp20 protects the heart from
ischemia-reperfusion-induced injury, leading to restoration of cardiac function and
reduced infarction
.On the other hand, the recognition of Hsp25 in Adr samples (0 and 8 weeks) may be
associated with two different stress-stimuli responses: the heart adriamycin toxic
injury immediately after treatment, and a reduction of left ventricular wall
thickness 8 weeks after treatment. Moreover, the parallelism between the
accumulation of Hsp25 and myosin in the Temp-Adr treated heart (0 week) suggests
temperature-associated cardioprotection. However, the diminution of myosin
accumulation at week 8 could be related to a significant reduction in the left
ventricular wall thickness and the higher percentage of subcellular damage. This is
in contrast to the observations for the control rats, which grew normally and showed
continuous accumulation of myosin throughout the experiment.The development of heat stress response has been extensively studied in order to
characterize the different steps of this form of preconditioning. It appears that
chemical signal indications (such as nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species, ROS)
released by sublethal hyperthermic stress trigger a complex cascade of signalling
events that include activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated
protein kinases (MAPK) and culminate in increased synthesis of inducible nitric
oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, antioxidant enzymes and protective proteins, such
as heat stress proteins
. Hyperthermia protects cells from adriamycin-induced death through induction
and phosphorylation of small Hsps and its antiapoptotic and actin-remodeling
activities
. The small Hsps, including human Hsp27 and the mouse homolog Hsp25, have
been shown to protect different types of cells against oxidative stress. Hsp25 may
play an important role in maintenance of muscle homeostasis, regulation of the
glutathione system and resistance to ROS in muscle cells. Moreover, Hsp25
overexpression above a certain threshold aids significant improvement of cardiac
morphology and histological appearance, as demonstrated by decreased fibrosis and
calcification and preservation of tissue integrity
.However, the issue of whether Hsps or antioxidant enzymes are the primary
end-effector of this cardioprotection continues to be a matter of debate
. There is increasing evidence that alpha-Hsps are concerned with functions
other than chaperoning. Several studies demonstrate an interaction between
alpha-Hsps and nucleic acids. It is known that an overexpression of Hsp27 in cells
can promote the accelerated recovery of heat shock-produced intranuclear protein
aggregates
. An involvement of Hsp25 granules in binding and targeting denatured
substrates for accelerated degradation has also been shown. Data revealing that the
Hsp25-luciferase granules are stained positively with antibodies to components of
the proteasome are supportive of such an idea
. Correlation between the total cellular level of Hsp25 phosphorylation and
the formation of nuclear granules has been shown. Dephosphorylated alpha-Hsps seem
to be very versatile protective agents, that play a dual role in protein and
membrane protection and might also be involved in the preservation of nucleic
acid
. On the other hand, although Hsp25 expression levels are quite high in
mature tissue, the developmental regulation of expression appears to be of
significant importance; therefore, developmentally associated changes cannot be
completely discriminated
.Adriamycin affects the expression and content of myocardial structural and regulatory
proteins, including that of alpha-myosin heavy chain, ventricular myosin light
chain-2 isoform, brain natriuretic peptide and in particular, myosin light chain
kinase (MLCK), which may disturb the control of coronary vessels
,
. In support of these results, in adriamycin-treated rats previously
protected with L-carnitine, which promotes Hsp70 and Hsp25
,
we observed remarkable recognition with anti-myosin light chain kinase
(unpublished results). Moreover, the most common abnormality in patients treated
with adriamycin was the increased afterload
exclusively attributable to reduced left ventricular wall thickness. In this
regard, acute pressure overload alters cardiac gene expression by mechanisms that
selectively regulate the translational activity of specific mRNAs. Expression of
many genes is also dependent on how efficiently each mRNA is translated
.The direct effect of chronic adriamycin treatment on the level of the contractile
machinery provides an additional mechanism through which anthracyclines exert their
debilitating cardiotoxic effects
. The decreased contractility of individual myocytes may relate to their low
myosin content and could contribute to the reduced cardiac output produced by
adriamycin treatment
. The demonstration that cardiac sarcomeric myosin organization is more
noticeably perturbed than myosin IIB or f-actin organization raises the intriguing
possibility that cardiac sarcomeric myosin may be a specific target that contributes
to the unique sensitivity of cardiac tissue to the toxic effects of adriamycin
. Both myosin and Hsp25 genes are developmentally regulated. This regulation
has been reported for the genes encoding the MLC genes, MLCIA and MLCIV. In
addition, the two MHC proteins, called MHCα and MHCbeta, are developmentally and
hormonally regulated as well as in response to cardiac hypertrophy due to
hemodynamic overload
.In this work, as a contribution to understanding the biological role of Hsp25 induced
by thermal stress and its relationship with myosin accumulation, the biologically
connected events herein discussed were mathematically integrated by the biometrical
and multivariate approaches. Even though the possible protection provided by the
hyperthermic strategy was not evident in the univariate analysis of each variable,
the PCA model proved the positive correlation between Hsp25 accumulation, the
thickness of the left ventricular wall and myosin accumulation. In addition,
mortality and cell damage were found to be inversely correlated with the
accumulation of myosin. Despite the PCA model robustness, a few inconsistencies
became evident, since the natural process compared with the mathematical reduction
includes many more unknown variables. However, the PCA model represents a powerful
technique in the approach to research of biological systems. Based on the induction
of Hsp25 and the myosin accumulation, which may enhance the cell-protecting
mechanism, hyperthermia needs further investigation as a possible cardioprotective
strategy.
Authors: Lisa E Morrison; Ross J Whittaker; Robert E Klepper; Eric F Wawrousek; Christopher C Glembotski Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-10-30 Impact factor: 4.733