Detection of the toxicity of a candidate compound at an early stage of drug development is an emerging area of interest. It is difficult to determine all of the effects of metabolism of a compound using traditional approaches such as histopathology and serum biochemistry. The goal of a metabolomics approach is to determine all metabolites in a living system, with the potential to detect and identify biomarkers involved in toxicity onset. Here, we summarize the metabolic fingerprints for detection and identification of metabolic changes and biomarkers related to drug-induced toxicity using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS).
Detection of the toxicity of a candidate compound at an early stage of drug development is an emerging area of interest. It is difficult to determine all of the effects of metabolism of a compound using traditional approaches such as histohemical">pathology and serum biochemistry. The goal of a metabolomics approach is to determine all metabolites in a living system, with the potential to detect and identify biomarkers involved in toxicity onset. Here, we summarize the metabolic fingerprints for detection and identification of metabolic changes and biomarkers related to drug-induced toxicity using Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS).
Analysis using the “omics” (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) has become
widespread in the post-genomics era, with one objective being the large-scale
quantitative determination of mRNAs, proteins and metabolites to establish gene
function and ascertain the connectivity within the “omics” hierarchy. 1 Metabolomics can be defined as an attempt to
measure all the metabolites within a cell, tissue or organism with a genetic
modification, in response to a physiological stimulus, or under specific conditions
at a specified time. 2 Metabolites are the
end-products of a biological system and changes in metabolites can therefore be
regarded as the final response of an organism to changes in gene expression.
Genome-wide expression of genes is amplified gradually through the hierarchy of the
transcriptome, proteome and metabolome. Changes in the concentrations of enzymes
(and the transcripts that encode them) may have only small effects via metabolic
pathways, but can have substantial effects on the concentration of metabolic
intermediates. Consequently, the metabolome may be more sensitive to perturbations
compared with either the transcriptome or proteome. 3The technologies that enable performance of metabolomics have recently increased in
power. 4 Transcriptomics and proteomics
are based on target chemical analysis of biopolymers composed of 4 different
nucleotides (transcriptome) or 20 amino acids (proteome). The chemical similarity of
these compounds facilitates high-throughput analysis. In contrast, the metabolome
has a large variety of chemical structures and properties, from ionic inorganic
species to hydrophilic carbohydrates, volatile alcohols and ketones, organic amino
and non-amino acids, hydrophobic lipids, and complex natural products. 5 This complexity makes it difficult to
determine the complete metabolome simultaneously. 6
Therefore, it is common to perform quantitative determination of one or a
few metabolites related to a specific metabolic pathway after extensive sample
preparation and separation from the sample matrix using chromatographic separation
and sensitive detection, which is refered to as “target analysis”. The following two
metabolomic approaches are common: i) metabolic profiling to identify and quantify
metabolites related through similar chemistries or metabolic pathways using
chromatographic separation before detection with minimal metabolite isolation after
sampling and ii) metabolic fingerprinting for rapid global analysis of crude samples
or extracts for classification or screening of samples without identification and
quantification.The technologies for metabolomics can also be classified into categories based on
detection using mass spectrometry (MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The high
sensitivity of MS makes it an important method for measuring metabolites in complex
biosamples. Gas chromatography (GC) and GC-MS are used for quantitative metabolic
profiling, with GC first used over 20 years ago for disease diagnosis. 7 There has been rapid growth in metabolomic
applications based on GC-MS for analysis of volatile and thermally stable polar and
nonpolar metabolites, while developments in liquid chromatography (LC)-MS and
capillary electrophoresis (CE)-MS have broadened the applicability of MS-based
metabolomics. Tandem MS and accurate mass (time of flight) methods are normally used
to validate the identities of unknown metabolites. NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy are
used for structural analysis of compounds, but have relatively low sensitivity
compared with MS. Nevertheless, NMR- and FT-IR-based metabolic profiling have been
used successfully in many fields because both methods are highly quantitative and
reproducible.The utility of metabolomics for toxic evaluation of compounds with NMR was
comprehensively assessed by the Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology (COMET), which
was founded by five major pharmaceutical companies and Imperial College London,
U.K. 8 The main objectives of COMET were
to assess and develop methodologies to generate a metabolomics database using NMR
analysis of rodent urine and blood serum dosed with hepato- and nephrotoxins for
preclinical toxicological screening of candidate drugs and to build an expert system
for prediction of the site and mechanism of toxicity. This approach was used
successfully to determine metabolic interspecies variation between rats and mice
dosed with a toxin. 9 The goal of the second
COMET project (COMET 2) is to improve on the knowledge obtained in COMET by detailed
testing of hypotheses in metabolomics using NMR and LC-MS. 10The discovery of biomarkers is a major objective in determining the toxicity of drug
and identification of toxic biomarkers through a metabolomics approach is an
emerging area. There are many reports of potential biomarkers in administration of a
variety of drugs, and identification of toxicological biomarkers may contribute to
assessment of the mechanisms of toxicity in drug development.
Metabolic Fingerprinting with FT-ICR MS for Biomarker Identification and Toxicity
Evaluation
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) can be used
to obtain an ultra-high resolution (>100,000) mass spectrum in about one second.
Separation of the metabolites is possible with this method alone, eliminating the
need for time-consuming chromatography and derivatization. Identification of
putative metabolites, or the class to which they belong, can be achieved by
determining the elemental composition of the metabolite based upon the ultra-high
mass accuracy. 11 , 12 The utility of this approach has been demonstrated in
phenotyping of plants, in which the ripening process has been investigated in
strawberries and transgenic mutant tobacco plants.
13 In this review, we summarize our recent findings for metabolic
fingerprints of rat urine using FT-ICR MS.
Drug-induced phospholipidosis
We used phospholipidosis (PLD), which is a well-examined drug-induced symptom, to
evaluate the utility of FT-ICR MS for toxicological metabolomics. 14 PLD can be induced by cationic
amphiphilic drugs (pan class="Chemical">CADs) 15 and is
characterized by an abnormal intracellular accumulation of phospholipids and
multilamellar bodies, as observed by electron microscopy. 16 Amiodarone (AMD), perhexiline, fluoxetine and
gentamicin induce PLD in humans, 15 and
PLD in animal models has been observed with CADs at doses far in excess of those
used clinically. Histopathological examinations using light and electron
microscopy have traditionally been used to detect PLD in drug-treated animals,
but these methods are time-consuming and cannot be performed in humans.
Urine samples from rats treated orally with AMD at 300 mg/kg/day for 3 days were
analyzed using an FT-ICR MS instrument equipped with a 7.0-T actively shielded
superconducting magnet (IonSpec, Lake Forest, CA, U.S.A.). Higher intensity
signals at m/z 192.06676 and 212.00239 and a lower intensity
signal at m/z 178.05101 were observed in the AMD-treated urine
samples compared to the controls (Fig. 1).
A loading plot revealed that these metabolites contributed to discrimination
among the samples. The ions at m/z 178.05101, 192.06676 and
212.00239 were identified as hippurate (HA), phenylacetylglycine (PAG) and
indican (IDN), respectively. PAG is the end product of phenylalanine metabolism
in rodents 17 and has been reported as a
biomarker using NMR 18 and LC-MS. 19 Elevation of urinary PAG after
treatment with a CAD such as AMD that causes phospholipid accumulation may be
related to changes in gut flora or the integrity of the intestine. 20 IDN is derived from the action of
intestinal bacteria containing tryptophanase, which converts tryptophan to
indole. Indole is then absorbed and conjugated in the liver to form IDN, which
was also shown to be a urinary PLD biomarker on the loading plot. AMD treatment
has been linked to changes in the gut or the integrity of the intestine that
result in increased absorption of the PAG precursor, phenylacetate (PA), leading
to an elevated level of urinary PAG. 20
A decrease in urinary HA levels has been detected in urinary metabolic
fingerprinting for AMD-induced PLD using NMR, 21
consistent with the findings from FT-ICR MS. The decrease in urinary HA
has been proposed as a nonspecific marker of toxicity that reflects a complex
combination of factors such as dietary intake and gut microbial metabolism. 22 , 23
These results show that urinary metabolic fingerprinting with FT-ICR MS
can be used to detect potent biomarkers for AMD-induced PLD and suggest that
this method is applicable to toxicological assessment of compounds.
Fig. 1
(A) FT-ICR MS spectrum and (B) loading plot for amiodarone-treated rats urine.
(A) Pre-dose (a) and 24 hours after final dosing (b). The intensity of the ions
at m/z 192.06676 and 212.00239 increased and that for the ion
at m/z 178.05101 decreased at 24 hours after final dosing
compared wtih the pre-dose levels. (B) The loading plot revealed that the
metabolites causing PCA exhibited m/z 178.05101, 192.06676 and
212.00239.
Drug-induced hepatotoxicity
The liver is the organ that is most exposed to drugs, with the concentration in
the liver often being higher than the peak plasma concentration. The liver is
also the major site for metabolism of xenobiotics that can lead to formation of
active metabolites. Thus, evaluation of liver toxicity is particularly important
in development of new therapeutic compounds. Here, we describe the urinary
metabolic fingerprint of rat urine following treatment with two hepatotoxins,
thioacetamide (TAA) and α-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT), to investigate the
relationship between histopathology and serum biochemistry and to search for
possible biomarkers involved in hepatic toxicity. 24 , 25TAA-induced acute hepatic injury in rats: Rats were administered a single
intraperitoneal injection of TAA (Day 0) at a dose of 300 mg/kg body weight. ALT
and AST in serum both increased on Day 1, indicating that hepatocyte injury had
occurred. These values decreased on Day 3 and were almost at pre-dose levels on
Day 5. Histopathologically, TAA-induced centrilobular necrosis of hepatocytes
accompanied by a small amount of mononuclear cell infiltration was observed on
Day 1 (Fig. 2b). Hepatocyte injury and
infiltration of mononuclear cells became more prominent in the centrilobular
area on Day 3 (Fig. 2c), and the majority
of infiltrating cells were reactive with anti-ED1 (Fig. 2d). Hepatocyte injury and cell infiltration had almost
completely disappeared on Days 5 (Fig. 2e)
and 7 (Fig. 2f).
Fig. 2
Histopathological examination of the liver in thioacetamide-treated rats. (a)
Normal histology of the control rat liver; HE stain, bar=60 μm.
(b) Hepatocyte injury and infiltration of a few mononuclear cells in the
centrilobular area of a treated rat on Day 1; HE stain, bar=60
μm. (c) More prominent hepatocyte injury and cell
infiltration in the centrilobular area on Day 3; HE stain, bar=60
μm. (d) The majority of infiltrated cells showed a positive
reaction with ED1 (a rat macrophage specific antibody) on Day 3;
immunohistochemistry counterstained with hematoxylin, bar=60
μm. (e) Injured hepatocytes and cell reactions disappeared in
the affected centrilubular area on Day 5; HE stain, bar=60 μm.
(f) The affected areas disappeared and recovered the features of the control
liver on Day 7; HE stain, bar=60 μm.
In negative ion spectra, the intensities of the ions at m/z
178.05038, 191.01967, 212.00226, 242.01320 and 258.99494 decreased on Days 1 and
3 compared to the pre-dose intensities (Fig.
3A). In positive ion spectra, the intensity of the ion at
m/z 401.20737 increased on Day 1, that at
m/z 266.05390 increased on Day 3, and that at
m/z 429.23882 decreased on Day 1 compared to the pre-dose
intensities (Fig. 4A). The PCA scores plot
showed that the negative ion compositions of TAA-treated rat urine samples on
Days 1 and 3 differed from the pre-dose compositions, with the largest change
seen on Day 1 (Fig. 3B). By Day 5, the
composition was close to that in pre-dose samples (Fig. 3B). ALT and AST are well-known serum biochemical markers for
hepatocyte injury and increased levels of these markers were seen on Day 1, with
subsequent decreases on Day 3. The shift on the PCA scores plot for the negative
ions showed a similar pattern for changes of ALT and AST. The positive ion
compositions of the TAA-treated rat urine samples on Days 1 and 3 also differed
from those in the pre-dose samples, but were similar to the pre-dose
compositions on Days 5 and 7 (Fig. 4B).
Histopathologically, hepatocyte injury accompanied by cell infiltration was seen
on Day 1 and these lesions were more prominent on Day 3. These results indicate
that the changes in positive ion compositions might reflect the
histopathological changes.
Fig. 3
(A) FT-ICR MS spectrum and (B) PCA scores for FT-ICR MS urinary profiles of
thioacetamide-treated rats recorded in negative ion mode. (A) Pre-dose (a), Day
1 (b), Day 3 (c) and Day 5 (d). The intensities of the ions at
m/z 178.05038, 191.01967, 212.00226, 242.01320 and
258.99494 decreased on Days 1 and 3 compared to the pre-dose intensities. (B)
Pre-dose (), Day 1 (), Day 3 () and Day 5 (). The PCA scores show that the negative ion
compositions of samples on Days 1 and 3 differed from the pre-dose composition.
The composition on Day 5 was similar to the pre-dose composition.
Fig. 4
(A) FT-ICR MS spectrum and (B) PCA scores for FT-ICR MS urinary profiles of
thioacetamide-treated rats recorded in positive ion mode. (A) Pre-dose (a), Day
1 (b), Day 3 (c), Day 5 (d) and Day 7 (e). The intensity of the ions at
m/z 266.05390 on Day 3 increased compared to the pre-dose
levels. (B) Pre-dose (), Day 1 (), Day 3
(),
Day 5 (),
Day 7 ().
The PCA scores show that the positive ion compositions of the samples on Days 1
and 3 differed from the pre-dose composition. The composition on Day 5 was
similar to the pre-dose composition.
The loading plot suggested that the negative ions at m/z
178.05038, 191.01967, 192.06628, 212.00226, 220.14673, 242.01320, 258.99494 and
303.06000 and the positive ions at m/z 266.05390, 401.20737 and
429.23882 were potential biomarkers for acute hepatic injury. The ions at
m/z 178.05038, 192.06628, 212.00226 and 242.01320 were
identified as HA, PAG, IDN and 3-methyldioxyindole sulfate, respectively. The
alterations of HA and IDN depended on administration of TAA, which caused
changes in the distribution of the bacterial flora. Decrease of an ion at
m/z 242 has been reported in urinary metabolic
fingerprinting in ANIT-induced intrahepatic cholestasis using LC-MS, 26 and this ion may be due to
3-methyldioxyindole sulfate. Therefore, these findings suggest that alteration
of urinary 3-methyldioxyindole sulfate may correlate with hepatotoxicity.The positive ion at m/z 266.05390 has the empirical formula
[C9H13N3O4K]+ (calculated [M+K]+
=266.05377, Δm/z 0.00013). The best candidate for this ion in
the compound library was the potassium ion (K+) adduct of deoxycytidine (dCyt).
MS/MS analysis of m/z 266.05390 in TAA-treated rat urine gave
rise to an ion at m/z 150.0 that resulted from loss of
deoxyribose (–116), and the MS/MS spectrum of m/z 266.05390 in
dCyt-spiked urine was identical to that for the TAA-treated sample. These data
are consistent with the hypothesis that m/z 266.05390 in the
TAA-treated urine was the K+ adduct of dCyt. Phagocytosis of cell debris by
macrophages leads to release of dCyt from these cells in vitro,
and normal rat tissues including the liver and kidney have no dCyt deaminase
activity for conversion of dCyt to deoxyuridine.
27 An increased number of macrophages were seen on Days 1 and 3 in
TAA-injected rats, in parallel with development of hepatocyte injury, and
therefore macrophage infiltration may be responsible for the occurrence of dCyt
in the urine on Days 1 and 3. The majority of macrophages in the injured liver
were reactive with ED1. Antigens recognized by ED1 occur on the membranes of
cytoplasmic granules, and especially on phagolysosomes of macrophages, and the
degree of ED1 expression depends on the phagocytic activity. 27 The increased number of ED1-reactive
macrophages on Days 1 and 3 reflects increased debris from injured hepatocytes.
A significant amount of dCyt released from infiltrated macrophages was excreted
in urine on Day 3, indicating a close relationship between hepatic macrophage
infiltration and the appearance of dCyt in urine after TAA administration.ANIT-induced intrahepatic cholestasis in rats: Rats were administered a single
oral injection of ANIT (Day 0) at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight. ALT and AST
in serum increased on Day 1, and these increases were more pronounced on Day 2.
Total bilirubin (TBIL) was markedly increased on Day 2, and a lesser increase in
alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was also observed. These levels then decreased on Day
4. In the ANIT-treated rats, bile duct degeneration and necrosis accompanied by
peribiliary infiltration and edema of neutrophils, and bile duct obstruction by
degenerative epithelium were seen on Day 1. On Day 2, regenerative bile ducts
with edema and inflammation around portal tracts, and bile duct proliferation
were observed. Degenerative vacuolation and single cell necrosis of hepatocytes
were evident on Days 1 and 2. Bile duct proliferation and increased mitosis of
hepatocytes were observed on Day 4.In negative ion spectra, the intensities of the ions at m/z
178.05168 and m/z 192.06730 decreased at 0–48 h and 7–31 h,
respectively, and those of the ions at m/z 512.26845 and
514.28485 increased at 7–55 h compared to the pre-dose intensities. The PCA
scores plot showed that the biochemical compositions of the ANIT-treated rat
urine samples at 7–24 h, 24–31 h, 31–48 h and 48–55 h differed from the pre-dose
composition, with the maximum difference at 24–31 h. The compositions of the
urine samples at 55–72 h and 72–96 h were almost the same as the pre-dose
composition. Increased levels of AST and ALT (serum markers for hepatocyte
injury) and ALP and TBIL (markers for cholestasis) were seen on Day 2. However,
there were no serum biochemical findings at 24–31 h, whereas the shift on the
PCA scores plot indicated differences in the urine composition at this time.
Therefore, these results suggest that urinary metabolic fingerprinting with
FT-ICR MS is more sensitive than traditional serum biochemistry methods.The loading plot indicated that the ions at m/z 178.05168,
192.06730, 195.05139, 242.01323, 512.26845 and 514.28485 were potential urinary
biomarkers for intrahepatic cholestasis. The ions at m/z
178.05168, 192.06730, 242.01323, 512.26845 and 514.28485 were identified as HA,
PAG, 3-methyldioxyindole sulfate, taurocholic acid (TA) with one double bond,
and TA, respectively. TA and TA with one double bond are both bile acids, and an
increase in the levels of urinary bile acids is a well-known feature of
intrahepatic cholestasis. 25
Histopathologically, cholestasis-induced bile ductar cell necrosis and
subsequent membrane breakdown caused by ANIT results in elevation of urinary
bile acids after 7–55 h. In previous urinary metabolic fingerprinting in
ANIT-induced intrahepatic cholestasis, changes in PAG have been found by
LC-MS 26 and a decrease in urinary
HA has been shown using NMR. 29 , 30The levels of 3-methyldioxyindole sulfate, a tryptophan metabolite, were lower at
0–24 h and higher at 31–55 h, but the relationship of this metabolite with
hepatic toxicity is unclear. A decrease of the ion at m/z 242
has been found in urinary metabolic fingerprinting in ANIT-induced intrahepatic
cholestasis using LC-MS, 25 and a
similar decrease was observed in rat urine following TAA-induced hepatic injury.
These results indicate that decrease in urinary 3-methyldioxyindole sulfate may
be correlated with hepatotoxicity. Further study is required to examine the
relationship between the toxicity of ANIT with potential biomarkers including
PAG, HA and 3-methyldioxyindole sulfate.
Conclusions
A number of metabolomics studies using NMR and/or MS have been performed to detect
metabolic alterations induced by administration of compounds to assess their
toxicity. The results shown above indicate that urinary metabolic fingerprinting
with FT-ICR MS can be used to detect metabolic changes and to identify potential
biomarkers induced by compounds with different mechanisms of toxicity. Therefore,
metabolomics approaches including metabolic fingerprinting have the potential to
reveal onset of toxicity at an early stage of drug development. To reach this goal,
improvements in the technology for metabolomics are required to allow detection of
the whole metabolome with a high degree of accuracy. Improved informatics
approaches, including database construction, are also needed for identification of
biomarkers, with follow-up studies to validate biomarker concentrations in biofluid
and metabolic pathways in vivo. These advances will allow future
application of toxicological assessment in personalized medicine.
Authors: Brett Lahner; Jiming Gong; Mehrzad Mahmoudian; Ellen L Smith; Khush B Abid; Elizabeth E Rogers; Mary L Guerinot; Jeffrey F Harper; John M Ward; Lauren McIntyre; Julian I Schroeder; David E Salt Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2003-08-31 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Susan C Connor; Wen Wu; Brian C Sweatman; Jodi Manini; John N Haselden; Daniel J Crowther; Catherine J Waterfield Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Kyu Hwan Park; Min Sun Kim; Sun Jong Baek; Ik Hyun Bae; Sang-Wan Seo; Jongjin Kim; Yong Kook Shin; Yong-Moon Lee; Hyun Sik Kim Journal: Plant Methods Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 4.993