Literature DB >> 22271944

United States aid policy and induced abortion in sub-Saharan Africa.

Eran Bendavid1, Patrick Avila, Grant Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Mexico City Policy, a United States government policy that prohibits funding to nongovernmental organizations performing or promoting abortion, was associated with the induced abortion rate in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS: Women in 20 African countries who had induced abortions between 1994 and 2008 were identified in Demographic and Health Surveys. A country's exposure to the Mexico City Policy was considered high (or low) if its per capita assistance from the United States for family planning and reproductive health was above (or below) the median among study countries before the policy's reinstatement in 2001. Using logistic regression and a difference-in-difference design, the authors estimated the differential change in the odds of having an induced abortion among women in high exposure countries relative to low exposure countries when the policy was reinstated.
FINDINGS: The study included 261,116 women aged 15 to 44 years. A comparison of 1994-2000 with 2001-2008 revealed an adjusted odds ratio for induced abortion of 2.55 for high-exposure countries versus low-exposure countries under the policy (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.76-3.71). There was a relative decline in the use of modern contraceptives in the high-exposure countries over the same time period.
CONCLUSION: The induced abortion rate in sub-Saharan Africa rose in high-exposure countries relative to low-exposure countries when the Mexico City Policy was reintroduced. Reduced financial support for family planning may have led women to substitute abortion for contraception. Regardless of one's views about abortion, the findings may have important implications for public policies governing abortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22271944      PMCID: PMC3260902          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.091660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  12 in total

1.  Do better family planning services reduce abortion in Bangladesh?

Authors:  M Rahman; J DaVanzo; A Razzaque
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Analysis of the underestimation of induced abortions in a survey of the general population in France.

Authors:  S Houzard; N Bajos; J Warszwawski; C de Guibert-Lantoine; M Kaminski; H Leridon; N Lelong; B Ducot; D Hassoun; M Ferrand
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  The potential role of contraception in reducing abortion.

Authors:  J Bongaarts; C F Westoff
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2000-09

4.  Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide.

Authors:  Gilda Sedgh; Stanley Henshaw; Susheela Singh; Elisabeth Ahman; Iqbal H Shah
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Abortion politics and health insurance reform.

Authors:  George J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Revising the proximate determinants of fertility framework: what have we learned in the past 20 years?

Authors:  J Stover
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1998-09

7.  Detecting induced abortions from reports of pregnancy terminations in DHS calendar data.

Authors:  R J Magnani; N Rutenberg; H G McCann
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Estimating induced abortion rates: a review.

Authors:  Clémentine Rossier
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2003-06

9.  Financing of global health: tracking development assistance for health from 1990 to 2007.

Authors:  Nirmala Ravishankar; Paul Gubbins; Rebecca J Cooley; Katherine Leach-Kemon; Catherine M Michaud; Dean T Jamison; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The incidence of abortion worldwide.

Authors:  S K Henshaw; S Singh; T Haas
Journal:  Int Fam Plann Persp       Date:  1999-01
View more
  16 in total

1.  The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.

Authors:  Jamie M Vernaelde
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.355

2.  An investigation of the impact of the Global Gag Rule on women's sexual and reproductive health outcomes in Uganda: a difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Margaret Giorgio; Fredrick Makumbi; Simon P S Kibira; Suzanne O Bell; Doris W Chiu; Lauren Firestein; Elizabeth Sully
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2022-12

3.  Awareness and Utilization of Adolescent Reproductive Health Services among In-School Adolescents in Urban and Rural Communities in Oyo State.

Authors:  Oluwatosin Ruth Ilori; Phillip Oluwatobi Awodutire; Oluwatosin Stephen Ilori
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2020-05-07

4.  Influences on pregnancy-termination decisions in Matlab, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Julie DaVanzo; Mizanur Rahman; Shahabuddin Ahmed; Abdur Razzaque
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-10

5.  The politics of unsafe abortion in Burkina Faso: the interface of local norms and global public health practice.

Authors:  Katerini T Storeng; Fatoumata Ouattara
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2014-08-18

Review 6.  The impacts of the global gag rule on global health: a scoping review.

Authors:  Constancia Mavodza; Rebecca Goldman; Bergen Cooper
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2019-08-29

7.  Investigating the early impact of the Trump Administration's Global Gag Rule on sexual and reproductive health service delivery in Uganda.

Authors:  Margaret Giorgio; Fredrick Makumbi; Simon Peter Sebina Kibira; Suzanne Bell; Selena Anjur-Dietrich; Elizabeth Sully
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Population Policy: Abortion and Modern Contraception Are Substitutes.

Authors:  Grant Miller; Christine Valente
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-08

9.  Mapping the impact of the expanded Mexico City Policy for HIV/ family planning service integration in PEPFAR-supported countries: a risk index.

Authors:  Jennifer Sherwood; Alana Sharp; Brian Honermann; Caitlin Horrigan; Meghna Chatterjee; Austin Jones; Chloe Cooney; Greg Millett
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  'Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance'? Towards a framework for assessing the health systems impact of the expanded Global Gag Rule.

Authors:  Marta Schaaf; Emily Maistrellis; Hana Thomas; Bergen Cooper
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.