Literature DB >> 22271924

Do elevated gravitational-force events while driving predict crashes and near crashes?

Bruce G Simons-Morton1, Zhiwei Zhang, John C Jackson, Paul S Albert.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the extent to which elevated gravitational-force event rates predict crashes and near crashes. Accelerometers, global positioning systems, cameras, and other technology were installed in vehicles driven by 42 newly licensed Virginia teenage drivers for a period of 18 months between 2006 and 2009. Elevated gravitational force and crash and near-crash events were identified, and rates per miles driven were calculated. (One mile = 1.6 km.) The correlation between crashes and near crashes and elevated gravitational-force event rates was 0.60. Analyses were done by using generalized estimating equations with logistic regression. Higher elevated gravitational-force event rates in the past month substantially increased the risk of a crash in the subsequent month (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.12). Although the difference in this relation did not vary significantly by time, it was highest in the first 6 months compared with the second and third 6-month periods. With a receiver operating characteristic curve, the risk models showed relatively high predictive accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.76. The authors conclude that elevated gravitational-force event rates can be used to assess risk and to show high predictive accuracy of a near-future crash.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22271924      PMCID: PMC3353134          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Teenage drivers: patterns of risk.

Authors:  Allan F Williams
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2003-01

2.  Crash and risky driving involvement among novice adolescent drivers and their parents.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Zhiwei Zhang; Sheila E Klauer; Suzanne E Lee; Jing Wang; Paul S Albert; Thomas A Dingus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Validation of two Framingham cardiovascular risk prediction algorithms in an Australian population: the 'old' versus the 'new' Framingham equation.

Authors:  Ella Zomer; Alice Owen; Dianna J Magliano; Danny Liew; Chris Reid
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2011-02

4.  Laws of accident causation.

Authors:  Rune Elvik
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2006-03-14

5.  Trends in young driver risk and countermeasures in European countries.

Authors:  Divera A M Twisk; Colin Stacey
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2007-04-04

6.  Jerky driving--An indicator of accident proneness?

Authors:  Omar Bagdadi; András Várhelyi
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-03-05
  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.

Authors:  Megan E Narad; Patrick Nalepka; Aimee E Miley; Dean W Beebe; Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

2.  Do Young Drivers Become Safer After Being Involved in a Collision?

Authors:  Fearghal O'Brien; Joe Bible; Danping Liu; Bruce G Simons-Morton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Driving in search of analyses.

Authors:  Bruce Simons-Morton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Innovative modeling of naturalistic driving data: Inference and prediction.

Authors:  Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Use of theory to guide development and application of sensor technologies in Nursing.

Authors:  Bonnie Gance-Cleveland; Catherine C McDonald; Rachel K Walker
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Bayesian Hierarchical Poisson Regression Models: An Application to a Driving Study with Kinematic Events.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Zhiwei Zhang; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Paul S Albert
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Effectiveness of a brief parent-directed teen driver safety intervention (Checkpoints) delivered by driver education instructors.

Authors:  Jennifer S Zakrajsek; Jean T Shope; Arlene I Greenspan; Jing Wang; C Raymond Bingham; Bruce G Simons-Morton
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  The effect on teenage risky driving of feedback from a safety monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; C Raymond Bingham; Marie Claude Ouimet; Anuj K Pradhan; Rusan Chen; Andrea Barretto; Jean T Shope
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  The association between kinematic risky driving among parents and their teenage children: moderation by shared personality characteristics.

Authors:  Johnathon P Ehsani; Bruce Simons-Morton; Yunlong Xie; Sheila G Klauer; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  Naturalistic teenage driving study: Findings and lessons learned.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Sheila G Klauer; Marie Claude Ouimet; Feng Guo; Paul S Albert; Suzanne E Lee; Johnathon P Ehsani; Anuj K Pradhan; Thomas A Dingus
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.