Literature DB >> 2227170

Qualitative and quantitative methods for the assessment of clinical preceptors.

B S Lewis1, W D Pace.   

Abstract

The improvement of clinical teaching skills has consistently been an important focus of faculty development in family medicine. Successful faculty development programs depend on an understanding of the components of clinical teaching and a profile of the strengths and weaknesses of each faculty member with respect to these components. In this study a system was developed to identify and measure specific faculty characteristics of inpatient preceptors. Complementary quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed. An analysis and comparison of the two approaches suggest that the measures result in a similar ranking of faculty, but that the qualitative approach identifies individual faculty strengths and weaknesses, which are more useful for providing feedback to stimulate and guide change.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2227170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  4 in total

1.  Framework for post-residency surgical education and training. The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.

Authors:  Cornelia R M G Fluit; Sanneke Bolhuis; Richard Grol; Roland Laan; Michel Wensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Effect of Formative Program Evaluation on Continuous Program Improvement: A Case Study of a Clinical Training Program in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Hyun Bae Yoon; Jwa-Seop Shin; Seung-Hee Lee; Do-Hwan Kim; Jinyoung Hwang; Eun Jung Kim; Ketsomsouk Bouphavanh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Measuring and assessing the competencies of preceptors in health professions: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Andrew D Bartlett; Irene S Um; Edward J Luca; Ines Krass; Carl R Schneider
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.