Literature DB >> 22271354

Perphenazine suspension: a new, old treatment, side effects and continuous use.

Pascale Chrisphonte1, Robert B Ostroff, Robert A Rosenheck.   

Abstract

A number of innovative delivery systems for acute antipsychotic pharmacotherapy have been developed over the years which include oral suspensions, rapidly dissolving wafers and acute intramuscular preparations. Currently, the availability of first generation antipsychotic (FGA) formulations is limited to two high potency agents: haloperidol and fluphenazine. At Yale New-Haven Psychiatric Hospital, the hospital pharmacy was able to create perphenazine suspension, a mid-potency FGA, with a record of effectiveness and tolerability that was no worse than that of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the CATIE trial. In this study we compare perphenazine suspension to other first and SGAs in the risk of extrapyramidal reactions and whether or not patients were continued on the same antipsychotic they were started with at the time of discharge. Medical records of patients who received acute pharmacotherapy in a unique form while hospitalized at Yale New Haven Psychiatric Hospital from July 2009 to December 2009 were examined. All data were collected thru a chart review using a form that was created to systematically document experiences. A total of 229 patients were included in the study. There were no significant differences between treatment groups on gender, age, race or diagnosis. In the entire samples 1.75% had pseudo-parkonisnism, 1.31% had acute dystonia, 0.04% had tardive dyskinesia, 1.31% akithesia, and 4.8% any neurological side effects. There were no significant differences between agents in the likelihood of any of these side effects or of having any side effect. Higher use of anticholinergics was found in patients treated with FGAs. We also found that 77% were discharged on the same antipsychotic agent they received when they were initially hospitalized. A wide range of acute oral pharmacoptherapy in non-tablet formulations of first and SGAs should be available in psychiatric hospital formularies. FGAs seems to be as well tolerated as SGAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22271354     DOI: 10.1007/s11126-011-9203-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  5 in total

1.  Extrapyramidal side-effects of antipsychotics in a randomised trial.

Authors:  Del D Miller; Stanley N Caroff; Sonia M Davis; Robert A Rosenheck; Joseph P McEvoy; Bruce L Saltz; Silvana Riggio; Miranda H Chakos; Marvin S Swartz; Richard S E Keefe; T Scott Stroup; Jeffrey A Lieberman
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lieberman; T Scott Stroup; Joseph P McEvoy; Marvin S Swartz; Robert A Rosenheck; Diana O Perkins; Richard S E Keefe; Sonia M Davis; Clarence E Davis; Barry D Lebowitz; Joanne Severe; John K Hsiao
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Incidence of tardive dyskinesia with atypical versus conventional antipsychotic medications: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Scott W Woods; Hal Morgenstern; John R Saksa; Barbara C Walsh; Michelle C Sullivan; Roy Money; Keith A Hawkins; Ralitza V Gueorguieva; William M Glazer
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in a randomized trial of treatment for chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Robert A Rosenheck; Douglas L Leslie; Jody Sindelar; Edward A Miller; Haiqun Lin; T Scott Stroup; Joseph McEvoy; Sonia M Davis; Richard S E Keefe; Marvin Swartz; Diana O Perkins; John K Hsiao; Jeffrey Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 5.  Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of reduced tardive dyskinesia with second-generation antipsychotics.

Authors:  R A Rosenheck
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.319

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.