Literature DB >> 22270932

Incidence of reduced chemotherapy relative dose intensity among women with early stage breast cancer in US clinical practice.

Derek Weycker1, Rich Barron, John Edelsberg, Alex Kartashov, Gary H Lyman.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy is widely used to treat early stage breast cancer (ESBC). Reductions and delays in dose administered--e.g., due to advanced age or febrile neutropenia (FN)--are generally believed to increase risk of disease progression and reduce survival. Little is known about incidence of reduced chemotherapy dose intensity among women with ESBC in the current era of US clinical practice. This study employed a retrospective cohort design and electronic medical records from > 65 community oncology/hematology clinics in > 35 states (2004-2010). The study population comprised adult women who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy for ESBC (stages I-IIIA). For each such woman, each unique cycle of chemotherapy within their first observed course was identified. Incidence of chemotherapy dose delays (≥ 7 days for any drug in ≥ 1 cycles), chemotherapy dose reductions (≥ 15% for any drug in ≥ 1 cycles), and low chemotherapy relative dose intensity (RDI <85% over the course) relative to published reference standards were descriptively analyzed for the seven most-frequently planned regimens in the study database. A total of 2,228 women (70% of the subjects who received chemotherapy for ESBC and met other selection criteria) initiated 1 of the 7 most-frequently planned regimens. Mean age of subjects was 54 years and 69% received primary prophylaxis against FN with a colony-stimulating factor. Incidence of dose delays, dose reductions, and low RDI was 31, 24, and 26%, respectively; low RDI typically was due to premature treatment discontinuation. For patients (n = 626) receiving the most common regimen (dose-dense AC-T: doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, Q2 × 4 cycles, paclitaxel or docetaxel, Q2 × 4 cycles), incidence of dose delays, dose reductions, and low RDI was 42, 29, and 32%, respectively. In the current era of US clinical practice, chemotherapy dose delays and dose reductions are common among women with ESBC receiving frequently used myelosuppressive dose-dense, as well as conventional, chemotherapy regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270932     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1949-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

1.  Tunneled pleural catheter use for pleural palliation does not increase infection rate in patients with treatment-related immunosuppression.

Authors:  Candice L Wilshire; Christopher R Gilbert; Brian E Louie; Ralph W Aye; Alexander S Farivar; Eric Vallières; Jed A Gorden
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT): a novel metric for evaluating the quality of oncosurgical therapy for malignancy.

Authors:  Thomas A Aloia; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Claudius Conrad; Vijaya Gottumukalla; Scott Kopetz; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  The effect of chemotherapy-induced anemia on dose reduction and dose delay.

Authors:  Leila Family; Lanfang Xu; Hairong Xu; Kimberly Cannavale; Olivia Sattayapiwat; John H Page; Chet Bohac; Chun Chao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Can complementary medicine increase adherence to chemotherapy dosing protocol? A controlled study in an integrative oncology setting.

Authors:  Ilanit Shalom-Sharabi; Ofer Lavie; Noah Samuels; Lital Keinan-Boker; Efraim Lev; Eran Ben-Arye
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Chemotherapy dosing in overweight and obese patients with cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Pre-treatment levels of inflammatory markers and chemotherapy completion rates in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Tim Schauer; Anna Henriksson; Emelie Strandberg; Henrik Lindman; Sveinung Berntsen; Ingrid Demmelmaier; Truls Raastad; Karin Nordin; Jesper F Christensen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Impact of chemotherapy relative dose intensity on cause-specific and overall survival for stage I-III breast cancer: ER+/PR+, HER2- vs. triple-negative.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Qingzhao Yu; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Michelle Loch; Vivien W Chen; Elizabeth Fontham; Tekeda Ferguson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Recruitment strategies and design considerations in a trial of resistance training to prevent dose-limiting toxicities in colon cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Justin C Brown; Kristin L Campbell; Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Catherine Lee; Michelle C Ross; Sara Quinney; Charles Quesenberry; Barbara Sternfeld; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  K Blackwell; V Semiglazov; D Krasnozhon; I Davidenko; L Nelyubina; R Nakov; G Stiegler; P Singh; A Schwebig; S Kramer; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Association of relative dose intensity with BMI and pathologic complete response in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ilana Usiskin; Fangyong Li; Melinda L Irwin; Brenda Cartmel; Tara Sanft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.