Literature DB >> 22270904

[Consequences of the German AMNOG for the identification of study objectives to demonstrate clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of innovative drugs].

D Götte1.   

Abstract

2011 on drug development are discussed. Assessment criteria for an evaluation of the cost/benefit relationship and on incremental clinical benefit as required by the law were retrospectively applied to those drugs which were approved by the EMA in 2009. On average drugs in comparator arms in development studies were cost effective. In most cases placebo was used as a comparator. Recent examples from the cardiovascular and the oral anti-diabetes areas revealed that the G-BA might go beyond EMA requirements; as a consequence two patent-protected products were withdrawn from the German market following G-BA assessment. Recommendations for future drug development strategies are provided. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270904     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  3 in total

1.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Analysis not appropriate.

Authors:  Siegfried Thorm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  What matters in type 2 diabetes mellitus oral treatment? A discrete choice experiment to evaluate patient preferences.

Authors:  Axel Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 3.  General practice-based clinical trials in Germany - a problem analysis.

Authors:  Eva Hummers-Pradier; Jutta Bleidorn; Guido Schmiemann; Stefanie Joos; Annette Becker; Attila Altiner; Jean-François Chenot; Martin Scherer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.