Literature DB >> 22270591

Influence of mercury from fly ash on cattle reared nearby thermal power plant.

Vikas Eknath Mahajan1, Raju Ravindra Yadav, Narayan Purushottam Dakshinkar, Vinod Madanlal Dhoot, Gautam Ramkrishna Bhojane, Madhura Kiran Naik, Preeti Shrivastava, Pravin Krishnarao Naoghare, Kannan Krishnamurthi.   

Abstract

Cattle grazing nearby coal-fired power stations are exposed to fly ash. The present investigation aims to assess the environmental and health impacts of fly ash containing mercury emitted from thermal power plant. The health effect of fly ash were studied using 20 lactating cattle reared within a 5-km radius of s thermal power plant for the possible effect of fly ash such as the alterations in hematological and biochemical parameters of blood, milk, and urine. Results indicated that the hemoglobin levels (6.65 ± 0.40 g/dl) were significantly reduced in all the exposed animals. Biochemical parameters viz., blood urea nitrogen (27.35 ± 1.19 mg/dl), serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (43.39 ± 3.08 IU/l), albumin, and creatinine were found to be increased, whereas serum glutamate pyruvic transaminase (29.26 ± 2.02) and Ca(2+) were observed to be statistically insignificant in exposed animals. Mercury concentrations estimated in the blood, milk, and urine of exposed (n = 20) and control (n = 20) animals were 7.41 ± 0.86, 4.75 ± 0.57, 2.08 ± 0.18, and 1.05 ± 0.07, 0.54 ± 0.03, 0.20 ± 0.02 μg/kg, respectively. The significant increase (P < 0.01) in the levels of mercury in blood, milk, and urine of exposed animals in comparison to control indicated that the alterations of biochemical parameters in exposed cattle could be due to their long term exposure to fly ash mercury which may have direct or indirect impact on human populations via food chain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270591     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2505-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  28 in total

1.  Cadmium and mercury cause an oxidative stress-induced endothelial dysfunction.

Authors:  Matthew B Wolf; John W Baynes
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 2.  Biologic markers for the early detection of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Won K Han; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  Effect of mercuric chloride on the structure and function of the kidney of sheep.

Authors:  M Robinson; A Hesketh
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.311

Review 4.  Risk assessment in relation to neonatal metal exposure.

Authors:  A Oskarsson; I Palminger Hallén; J Sundberg; K Petersson Grawé
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Distribution of detoxifying genes polymorphism in Maharastrian population of central India.

Authors:  Sivanesan Saravana Devi; Nadimuthu Vinayagamoorthy; Meenal Agrawal; Arup Biswas; Raka Biswas; Pravin Naoghare; Sreya Kumbhakar; Kannan Krishnamurthi; Jan G Hengstler; Matthias Hermes; Tapan Chakrabarti
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Cytotoxicity of inhaled coal fly ash in rats.

Authors:  S S Chauhan; V K Chaudhary; S Narayan; U K Misra
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Endogenous antioxidant defence system in rat liver following mercury chloride oral intoxication.

Authors:  Inmaculada Bando; María Isabel Sánchez Reus; David Andrés; María Cascales
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.642

8.  Technical note: Vetiver can grow on coal fly ash without DNA damage.

Authors:  Rajarshi Chakraborty; Anita Mukherjee
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.212

9.  Large-scale spatial variation in mercury concentrations in cattle in NW Spain.

Authors:  M López Alonso; J L Benedito; M Miranda; J A Fernández; C Castillo; J Hernández; R F Shore
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Mercury concentrations in cattle from NW Spain.

Authors:  M López Alonso; J L Benedito; M Miranda; C Castillo; J Hernández; R F Shore
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-01-20       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review.

Authors:  Jillian E Gall; Robert S Boyd; Nishanta Rajakaruna
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Soil mercury levels in the area surrounding the Cerro Prieto geothermal complex, MEXICO.

Authors:  M A Pastrana-Corral; F T Wakida; E García-Flores; D D Rodriguez-Mendivil; A Quiñonez-Plaza; T D J Piñon-Colin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Non-invasive biomonitoring of mercury in birds near thermal power plants: lessons from Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Sunidhi Thakur; Shalini Dhyani; Kavita Bramhanwade; Krishna Kumar Pandey; Naresh Bokade; Ramesh Janipella; Paras Pujari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Sources, toxicity, and remediation of mercury: an essence review.

Authors:  Deep Raj; Subodh Kumar Maiti
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.513

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.