Literature DB >> 22270271

The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.

Elizabeth G Raymond1, David A Grimes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of abortion compared with childbirth.
METHODS: We estimated mortality rates associated with live births and legal induced abortions in the United States in 1998-2005. We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, birth certificates, and Guttmacher Institute surveys. In addition, we searched for population-based data comparing the morbidity of abortion and childbirth.
RESULTS: The pregnancy-associated mortality rate among women who delivered live neonates was 8.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. The mortality rate related to induced abortion was 0.6 deaths per 100,000 abortions. In the one recent comparative study of pregnancy morbidity in the United States, pregnancy-related complications were more common with childbirth than with abortion.
CONCLUSION: Legal induced abortion is markedly safer than childbirth. The risk of death associated with childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than that with abortion. Similarly, the overall morbidity associated with childbirth exceeds that with abortion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270271     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  41 in total

1.  No benefit to women or fetuses.

Authors:  Annmarie Hosie
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2017-05-03

2.  The Severity and Management of Complications Among Postabortion Patients Treated in Kinshasa Health Facilities.

Authors:  Akinrinola Bankole; Patrick Kayembe; Sophia Chae; Onikepe Owolabi; Jesse Philbin; Crispin Mabika
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Implications of Georgia's 20-Week Abortion Ban.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Inequalities in access to and quality of abortion services in Mexico: Can task-sharing be an opportunity to increase legal and safe abortion care?

Authors:  Raffaela Schiavon; Erika Troncoso
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  A 21st-Century Public Health Approach to Abortion.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Liza Fuentes; Nancy F Berglas; Amanda J Dennis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Abortion services in Canada: access and safety.

Authors:  Laura Schummers; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mercier; Mara Buchbinder; Amy Bryant
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2015-08-19

8.  Perspectives Among Canadian Physicians on Factors Influencing Implementation of Mifepristone Medical Abortion: A National Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sarah Munro; Edith Guilbert; Marie-Soleil Wagner; Elizabeth S Wilcox; Courtney Devane; Sheila Dunn; Melissa Brooks; Judith A Soon; Megan Mills; Genevieve Leduc-Robert; Kate Wahl; Erik Zannier; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback.

Authors:  Louise Finer; Johanna B Fine
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  The Maternal Mortality Myth in the Context of Legalized Abortion.

Authors:  Byron Calhoun
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.