Literature DB >> 22269678

Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 surgery: use of frozen versus fresh corneal donor carriers.

Marie-Claude Robert1, Katarzyna Biernacki, Mona Harissi-Dagher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine whether frozen corneas can be successfully used as carriers of the Boston keratoprosthesis (KPro).
METHODS: Prospective study of 37 patients undergoing KPro surgery with fresh or frozen corneas as carriers. Patients were randomized to receive either a fresh corneal graft or a frozen corneal graft during implantation of the Boston KPro. The randomization depended on availability of fresh versus frozen corneas offered by the local eye bank. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon. Outcome measures included retention of the device, level of preoperative and postoperative visual acuities (VAs), and complications.
RESULTS: The indication for Boston KPro was corneal graft failure in 24 eyes; 13 patients had KPro as a primary procedure. The assembly of the Boston KPro and surgery were uneventful in all cases. Mean follow-up was 9.65 months. Median preoperative VA was counting fingers (range, 20/100 to light perception) in the fresh cornea group (19 eyes) and hand motions (range, 20/150 to light perception) in the frozen cornea group (18 eyes). Median postoperative VA were 20/150 (range, 20/30 to hand motions) and 20/150 (range, 20/40 to counting fingers) in the fresh and frozen cornea groups, respectively. Inflammation and retroprosthetic membrane formation were the most common complications with similar rates between the 2 groups. The device retention rate was 100% at the end of the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Frozen and fresh corneal donors seem equally efficient and safe as carriers of the Boston KPro with similar recuperation of VA and no untoward complications, such as melt, leaks, or endophthalmitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22269678     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823e6110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

1.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Masako Chen; Sueko M Ng; Esen K Akpek; Sumayya Ahmad
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 2.  Artificial corneas versus donor corneas for repeat corneal transplants.

Authors:  Esen K Akpek; Majed Alkharashi; Frank S Hwang; Sueko M Ng; Kristina Lindsley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-05

3.  UV cross-linking of donor corneas confers resistance to keratolysis.

Authors:  Samer N Arafat; Marie-Claude Robert; Anita N Shukla; Claes H Dohlman; James Chodosh; Joseph B Ciolino
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Clinical outcomes of long-term corneas preserved frozen in Eusol-C used in emergency tectonic grafts.

Authors:  Barbara Burgos-Blasco; Beatriz Vidal-Villegas; Isabel Collado-Vincueria; Ana Maria Soria-García; Ricardo Cuiña-Sardiña; Rosalía Mendez-Fernandez; David Diaz-Valle; Mayte Ariño-Gutierez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.752

Review 5.  Low-cost and readily available tissue carriers for the Boston keratoprosthesis: a review of possibilities.

Authors:  Andrea Cruzat; Allyson Tauber; Anita Shukla; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Roberto Pineda; Claes H Dohlman
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Boston keratoprosthesis - Clinical outcomes with wider geographic use and expanding indications - A systematic review.

Authors:  Khalid Al Arfaj
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.