Literature DB >> 22269409

Diagnostic value of acetic acid comparing with conventional Pap smear in the detection of colposcopic biopsy-proved CIN.

Divya Hegde1, Harish Shetty, Prasanna K Shetty, Supriya Rai.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the role of visual inspection with acetic acid as an alternative to Pap smear and in screening program for cervical cancer in low resource settings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 225 women in the reproductive age group attending the Department of Gynecology were enrolled in the study. A Papanicolaou smear and visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid was done. All patients who tested positive on screening then underwent a colposcopy-guided biopsy. The Pap smear of a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and above was taken as abnormal. The statistical test used was the chi-square test and results were computed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 12.0.
RESULTS: Out of 225 patients, acetic acid (VIA) was positive in 27 (12%) patients and the Pap smear was abnormal in 26 (11.7%). There were 15 LSIL, 6 high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and 5 were squamous cell carcinoma. On biopsy, there were 15 mild dysplasia, 2 moderate dysplasia, 4 severe dysplasia, and 3 squamous cancers. The Pap smear had a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 98%, and positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 97.9%. VIA had a sensitivity of 70.8%, specificity of 95%, and positive predictive value of 62.9% and negative predictive value of 96.5%.
CONCLUSION: Since diagnostic values of VIA is comparable to Pap smear, and it performs well in detecting a high grade lesion, we conclude that VIA can be used as a screening modality for cervical cancer in low resource settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22269409     DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.92019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  11 in total

1.  Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Worse by Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16/18, and Colposcopy Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Jeff Andrews; Charles K Cooper; Julia C Gage; Michael A Gold; Michelle J Khan; L Stewart Massad; Valentin Parvu; Rebecca B Perkins; Mark Schiffman; Katie M Smith; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  A fully integrated paperfluidic molecular diagnostic chip for the extraction, amplification, and detection of nucleic acids from clinical samples.

Authors:  Natalia M Rodriguez; Winnie S Wong; Lena Liu; Rajan Dewar; Catherine M Klapperich
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Comparing the results of Pap smear and Direct Visual Inspection (DVI) with 5% acetic acid in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Shakiba Pourasad-Shahrak; Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr; Parvin Mostafa-Garebaghi; Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi; Jamileh Malakouti; Monireh Haghsay
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

4.  Prevalence of Abnormal Pap Smears: A Descriptive Study from a Cancer Center in a Low-Prevalence Community

Authors:  Bayan Maraqa; Isam Lataifeh; Lian Otay; Osama Badran; Yasar Qutaiba Nouri; Ibtihal Issam; Maysa Al Hussaini
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-11-26

5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data to Assess the Sensitivity of Cervical Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Alejandra Castanon; Rebecca Landy; Dimitrios Michalopoulos; Roshni Bhudia; Hannah Leaver; You Lin Qiao; Fanghui Zhao; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01

6.  Individual-level and community-level determinants of cervical cancer screening among Kenyan women: a multilevel analysis of a Nationwide survey.

Authors:  Fentanesh Nibret Tiruneh; Kun-Yang Chuang; Peter Austin Morton Ntenda; Ying-Chih Chuang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Hazem Mahmoud Al-Mandeel; Emad Sagr; Khalid Sait; Hassan Mohamed Latifah; Abdulaziz Al-Obaid; Ismail A Al-Badawi; Abdulmohsen O Alkushi; Hany Salem; Nada S Massoudi; Holger Schunemann; Reem A Mustafa; Romina Brignardello-Petersen
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Point-of-care cervical cancer screening using deep learning-based microholography.

Authors:  Divya Pathania; Christian Landeros; Lucas Rohrer; Victoria D'Agostino; Seonki Hong; Ismail Degani; Maria Avila-Wallace; Misha Pivovarov; Thomas Randall; Ralph Weissleder; Hakho Lee; Hyungsoon Im; Cesar M Castro
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  Validation of Serological Antibody Profiles Against Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Antigens as Markers for Early Detection of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Dolores Azucena Salazar-Piña; Adolfo Pedroza-Saavedra; Aurelio Cruz-Valdez; Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo; Minerva Maldonado-Gama; Lilia Chihu-Amparan; Angelica Nallelhy Rodriguez-Ocampo; Emilia Orozco-Fararoni; Fernando Esquivel-Guadarrama; Lourdes Gutierrez-Xicotencatl
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Cross-sectional Study on Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Pap Smear Positivity Rates According to Sociodemographic Factors Among Rural Married Women of Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh).

Authors:  Ruchi Arun; Jai Prakash Singh; Shyam Bihari Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.