Literature DB >> 22269408

Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery.

Ali Aminian1, Nekoo Panahi, Rasoul Mirsharifi, Faramarz Karimian, Alipasha Meysamie, Zhamak Khorgami, Abbas Alibakhshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy remains an important source of postoperative morbidity in spite of advances in the management of these patients. The aim of this study is to identify the predictive factors of cervical anastomotic leakage and its consequences after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer treated in a high volume cancer center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 418 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy in a referral cancer center between 2001 and 2006. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and surgical data were collected from medical charts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI 95% ) were calculated.
RESULTS: Predictive factors of leakage in univariate analysis were history of hypertension (P=0.003), diabetes mellitus (P=0.008), forced expiratory volume in one second percent predicted (FEV1%) (P=0.024), preoperative serum creatinine level (P=0.004), and degree of differentiation of the tumor (P=0.014); however, multivariate regression analysis identified history of hypertension (OR 7.2, [CI 95% :1.9 to 28.1]; P=0.004) and serum creatinine level > 0.85 mg/dl (OR 3.1, [CI 95% :1.04 to 9.04]; P=0.042) as independently significant risk factors. Pulmonary complications (P=0.042) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.0001) were observed significantly more in patients with anastomotic leakage. Cervical leakage was not associated with increased mortality rate (P=0.312).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative conditions like hypertension and higher creatinine levels predict development of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery. Postoperative consequences accompanying leakage include pulmonary complication and prolonged hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22269408     DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.92016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  24 in total

1.  Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Masahiro Ito; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A non-randomized retrospective observational study on the subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: is it feasible in high-risk patients?

Authors:  Jae Ho Chung; Sung Ho Lee; Eunjue Yi; Jae Seung Jung; Jung Wook Han; Tae Sik Kim; Ho Sung Son; Kwang Taik Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Preoperative Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels Predict Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy with Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Yu Imamura; Satoshi Kamiya; Kotaro Yamashita; Takanori Kurogochi; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  [Management of postoperative complications following esophagectomy].

Authors:  D Schubert; St Dalicho; L Flohr; F Benedix; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Postoperative complications do not affect long-term outcome in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kirsten Lindner; Mathias Fritz; Christina Haane; Norbert Senninger; Daniel Palmes; Richard Hummel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  miR-204 inhibits invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting FOXM1 in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yurong Sun; Xiuwen Yu; Qingyang Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?

Authors:  Ying-Jian Wang; Xue-Hai Liu; Long-Yong Mei; Kun-Kun Li; Yao-Guang Jiang; Wei Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Completely Linear Stapled Versus Handsewn Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tarun Kumar; Ravi Krishanappa; Esha Pai; Raxith Sringeri; T B Singh; Jyoti Swain; Sindhuri Kondapavuluri; Manoj Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  The predictive value of plasma cytokines on gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage at an early stage in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jie-Qiong Song; Yi-Zhou He; Yuan Fang; Wei Wu; Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  [Management of perioperative complications following tumor resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  F Benedix; S F Dalicho; B Garlipp; H Ptok; J Arend; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.