Literature DB >> 22268786

Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents.

Anni Arponen1, Joona Lehtomäki, Jarno Leppänen, Erkki Tomppo, Atte Moilanen.   

Abstract

The outcome of analyses that prioritize locations for conservation on the basis of distributions of species, land cover, or other elements is influenced by the spatial resolution of data used in the analyses. We explored the influence of data resolution on prioritization of Finnish forests with Zonation, a software program that ranks the priority of cells in a landscape for conservation. We used data on the distribution of different forest types that were aggregated to nine different resolutions ranging from 0.1 × 0.1 km to 25.6 × 25.6 km. We analyzed data at each resolution with two variants of Zonation that had different criteria for prioritization, with and without accounting for connectivity and with and without adjustment for the effect on the analysis of edges between areas at the project boundary and adjacent areas for which data do not exist. Spatial overlap of the 10% of cells ranked most highly when data were analyzed at different resolutions varied approximately from 15% to 60% and was greatest among analyses with similar resolutions. Inclusion of connectivity or edge adjustment changed the location of areas that were prioritized for conservation. Even though different locations received high priority for conservation in analyses with and without accounting for connectivity, accounting for connectivity did not reduce the representation of different forest types. Inclusion of connectivity influenced most the outcome of fine-resolution analyses because the connectivity extents that we based on dispersal distances of typical forest species were small. When we kept the area set aside for conservation constant, representation of the forest types increased as resolution increased. We do not think it is necessary to avoid use of high-resolution data in spatial conservation prioritization. Our results show that large extent, fine-resolution analyses are computationally feasible, and we suggest they can give more flexibility to implementation of well-connected reserve networks. ©2012 Society for Conservation Biology.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268786     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01814.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  10 in total

1.  Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism.

Authors:  Federico Montesino Pouzols; Tuuli Toivonen; Enrico Di Minin; Aija S Kukkala; Peter Kullberg; Johanna Kuusterä; Joona Lehtomäki; Henrikki Tenkanen; Peter H Verburg; Atte Moilanen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Returns from matching management resolution to ecological variation in a coral reef fishery.

Authors:  Michael Bode; James N Sanchirico; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spotting what's important: Priority areas, connectivity, and conservation of the Northern Tiger Cat (Leopardus tigrinus) in Colombia.

Authors:  José F González-Maya; Diego A Zárrate-Charry; Andrés Arias-Alzate; Leonardo Lemus-Mejía; Angela P Hurtado-Moreno; Magda Gissella Vargas-Gómez; Teresa Andrea Cárdenas; Victor Mallarino; Jan Schipper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  What Data to Use for Forest Conservation Planning? A Comparison of Coarse Open and Detailed Proprietary Forest Inventory Data in Finland.

Authors:  Joona Lehtomäki; Sakari Tuominen; Tuuli Toivonen; Antti Leinonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effectiveness of protected areas for representing species and populations of terrestrial mammals in Costa Rica.

Authors:  José F González-Maya; Luis R Víquez-R; Jerrold L Belant; Gerardo Ceballos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Conceptual framework and uncertainty analysis for large-scale, species-agnostic modelling of landscape connectivity across Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Ronan Marrec; Hossam E Abdel Moniem; Majid Iravani; Branko Hricko; Jahan Kariyeva; Helene H Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits.

Authors:  Brad H McRae; Sonia A Hall; Paul Beier; David M Theobald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bioacoustics for species management: two case studies with a Hawaiian forest bird.

Authors:  Esther Sebastián-González; Joshua Pang-Ching; Jomar M Barbosa; Patrick Hart
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  High-resolution satellite imagery is an important yet underutilized resource in conservation biology.

Authors:  Sarah A Boyle; Christina M Kennedy; Julio Torres; Karen Colman; Pastor E Pérez-Estigarribia; Noé U de la Sancha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Complementarity and Area-Efficiency in the Prioritization of the Global Protected Area Network.

Authors:  Peter Kullberg; Tuuli Toivonen; Federico Montesino Pouzols; Joona Lehtomäki; Enrico Di Minin; Atte Moilanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.