Literature DB >> 22268693

Genotype × environment interaction, environmental heterogeneity and the lek paradox.

Michael D Greenfield1, R G Danka, J M Gleason, B R Harris, Y Zhou.   

Abstract

Substantial additive genetic variance (V(A)) often exists for male signalling traits in spite of the directional selection that female choice imposes. One solution to this problem, a conundrum generally termed the 'lek paradox', is that genotype × environment interaction (GEI) occurs and generates a 'crossover' of reaction norms in which no one genotype performs in a superior manner in all environments. Theoretical work indicates that such crossover can sustain genetic variance provided that either (i) spatial heterogeneity in environmental conditions combined with limited migration among populations or (ii) temporal heterogeneity in environmental conditions combined with occasional generation overlap is present. Whereas some recent studies have revealed the intersection of reaction norms for sexually selected traits in laboratory and in natural populations, associated information on environmental heterogeneity, migration and generation overlap has not been investigated. We studied this question in an acoustic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella, in which previous work indicated GEI and crossover of reaction norms for several parameters of the male song evaluated by females. We measured reaction norms for male song as expressed when development was completed under different environmental conditions in four neighbouring, yet isolated, populations during 1 year and in one of these populations during consecutive years. Crossover occurred for the various song parameters in the several populations, but we did not observe a higher incidence of crossover between genotypes taken from two different populations than from the same population. However, for several key song parameters, crossover between genotypes taken from two different years was higher than that between genotypes from the same year. We suggest that temporal heterogeneity in the form of varying selection could potentially conserve V(A) in A. grisella, but we also note other factors that might contribute.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268693     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02450.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  4 in total

1.  Nonlinear changes in selection on a mating display across a continuous thermal gradient.

Authors:  Malcolm Fogelin Rosenthal; Damian O Elias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Body shape differences in a pair of closely related Malawi cichlids and their hybrids: Effects of genetic variation, phenotypic plasticity, and transgressive segregation.

Authors:  Martin Husemann; Michael Tobler; Cagney McCauley; Baoqing Ding; Patrick D Danley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Development of a Genomic Resource and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Male Calling Traits in the Lesser Wax Moth, Achroia grisella.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gleason; Yihong Zhou; Jennifer L Hackett; Bethany R Harris; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Resource quality affects weapon and testis size and the ability of these traits to respond to selection in the leaf-footed cactus bug, Narnia femorata.

Authors:  Daniel A Sasson; Patricio R Munoz; Salvador A Gezan; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.