Literature DB >> 22268662

Functional disorders after rectal cancer resection: does a rehabilitation programme improve anal continence and quality of life?

A Laforest1, F Bretagnol, A S Mouazan, L Maggiori, M Ferron, Y Panis.   

Abstract

AIM: A poor functional outcome is often reported after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, especially when sphincter-saving resection with intersphincteric dissection is performed for low tumours. Anal sphincter rehabilitation is widely proposed for faecal incontinence. Very few studies have reported results to improve anal dysfunction following rectal surgery. This prospective study aimed to assess the benefits of sphincter training after TME in terms of functional outcome and quality of life.
METHODS: Anal sphincter training was performed in patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter-saving TME for rectal cancer. Rehabilitation was performed after ileostomy closure. This group was compared with 24 matched patients. Assessment included one functional and two quality of life questionnaires (SF-36 Health Status and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score).
RESULTS: From 2007 to 2009, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic TME. The median follow-up after stoma closure was 21.2 (range 8-46) months. The mean stool frequency per day was significantly lower after sphincter training (2.6 in the training group vs 4.0 in the control group, P=0.025). Following rehabilitation, patients complained significantly less about dyschezia (22 vs 63%, P=0.008). Both groups had similar continence (Wexner score 8.3 after training vs 9.9 in controls, NS). Quality of life was significantly improved by sphincter training as measured by the vitality (P=0.004) and mental functioning (P=0.02) subscales on the SF-36 Health Status questionnaire and by the depression and self-perception (P = 0.005) categories of the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that anal sphincter training following TME could decrease stool frequency and improve both general and specific quality of life.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268662     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02956.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  20 in total

Review 1.  Treatment possibilities for low anterior resection syndrome: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Audrius Dulskas; Edgaras Smolskas; Inga Kildusiene; Narimantas E Samalavicius
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Pelvic floor rehabilitation in the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Kelly M Scott
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

3.  Survivorship care plans for people with colorectal cancer: do they reflect the research evidence?

Authors:  V D'Souza; H Daudt; A Kazanjian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version of low anterior resection syndrome score.

Authors:  N E Samalavicius; A Dulskas; M Lasinskas; G Smailyte
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Bowel Dysfunction After Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masayuki Ishii; Yujiro Kokado; Kouji Fujimoto; Hiroshi Higashiyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Thymidine phosphorylase and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α expression in clinical stage II/III rectal cancer: association with response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and prognosis.

Authors:  Shuhan Lin; Hao Lai; Yuzhou Qin; Jiansi Chen; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 7.  Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome after a low anterior resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilhelmina S Visser; Wouter W Te Riele; Djamila Boerma; Bert van Ramshorst; Henderik L van Westreenen
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 8.  Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and "low anterior resection syndrome" following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  O Schwandner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.