Literature DB >> 22268594

Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis.

Matthew H Greenstone1, Donald C Weber, Thomas A Coudron, Mark E Payton, Jing S Hu.   

Abstract

Ecological research requires large samples for statistical validity, typically hundreds or thousands of individuals, which are most efficiently gathered by mass-collecting techniques. For the study of interspecific interactions, molecular gut-content analysis enables detection of arthropod predation with minimal disruption of community interactions. Field experiments have demonstrated that standard mass-collection methods, such as sweep netting, vacuum sampling and foliage beating, sometimes lead to contamination of predators with nontarget DNA, thereby compromising resultant gut-content data. We deliberately contaminated immature Coleomegilla maculata and Podisus maculiventris that had been fed larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata by topically applying homogenate of the alternate prey Leptinotarsa juncta. We then attempted to remove contaminating DNA by washing in ethanol or bleach. A 40-min wash with end-over-end rotation in 80% EtOH did not reliably reduce external DNA contamination. Identical treatment with 2.5% commercial bleach removed most externally contaminating DNA without affecting the detectability of the target prey DNA in the gut. Use of this bleaching protocol, perhaps with minor modifications tailored to different predator-prey systems, should reliably eliminate external DNA contamination, thereby alleviating concerns about this possible source of cross-contamination for mass-collected arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis. Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268594     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  9 in total

1.  The specific host plant DNA detection suggests a potential migration of Apolygus lucorum from cotton to mungbean fields.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Wei-Fang Bao; Fan Yang; Bin Xu; Yi-Zhong Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  DNA Metabarcoding as a Tool for Disentangling Food Webs in Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Ahmadou Sow; Julien Haran; Laure Benoit; Maxime Galan; Thierry Brévault
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 3.  Fish as predators and prey: DNA-based assessment of their role in food webs.

Authors:  Michael Traugott; Bettina Thalinger; Corinna Wallinger; Daniela Sint
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.051

4.  Molecular detection of field predation among larvae of two ladybird beetles is partially predicted from laboratory experiments.

Authors:  Gabriele Rondoni; Saleh Fenjan; Valeria Bertoldi; Fulvio Ielo; Khaled Djelouah; Chiaraluce Moretti; Roberto Buonaurio; Carlo Ricci; Eric Conti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  High Rate of Non-Human Feeding by Aedes aegypti Reduces Zika Virus Transmission in South Texas.

Authors:  Mark F Olson; Martial L Ndeffo-Mbah; Jose G Juarez; Selene Garcia-Luna; Estelle Martin; Monica K Borucki; Matthias Frank; José Guillermo Estrada-Franco; Mario A Rodríguez-Pérez; Nadia A Fernández-Santos; Gloria de Jesús Molina-Gamboa; Santos Daniel Carmona Aguirre; Bernardita de Lourdes Reyes-Berrones; Luis Javier Cortés-De la Cruz; Alejandro García-Barrientos; Raúl E Huidobro-Guevara; Regina M Brussolo-Ceballos; Josue Ramirez; Aaron Salazar; Luis F Chaves; Ismael E Badillo-Vargas; Gabriel L Hamer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 6.  High-throughput sequencing for community analysis: the promise of DNA barcoding to uncover diversity, relatedness, abundances and interactions in spider communities.

Authors:  Susan R Kennedy; Stefan Prost; Isaac Overcast; Andrew J Rominger; Rosemary G Gillespie; Henrik Krehenwinkel
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Consuming alternative prey does not influence the DNA detectability half-life of pest prey in spider gut contents.

Authors:  Dávid Fülöp; Éva Szita; Regina Gerstenbrand; Gergely Tholt; Ferenc Samu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Predation on Drosophila suzukii within Hedges in the Agricultural Landscape.

Authors:  Alexandra Siffert; Fabian Cahenzli; Patrik Kehrli; Claudia Daniel; Virginie Dekumbis; Barbara Egger; Jana Furtwengler; Camille Minguely; Nicola Stäheli; Franco Widmer; Dominique Mazzi; Jana Collatz
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Metabarcoding versus mapping unassembled shotgun reads for identification of prey consumed by arthropod epigeal predators.

Authors:  Débora Pires Paula; Suellen Karina Albertoni Barros; Rafael Major Pitta; Marliton Rocha Barreto; Roberto Coiti Togawa; David A Andow
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.524

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.