Literature DB >> 22268519

Single-platform quality control assay to quantify multipotential stromal cells in bone marrow aspirates prior to bulk manufacture or direct therapeutic use.

Richard Cuthbert1, Sally A Boxall, Hiang Boon Tan, Peter V Giannoudis, Dennis McGonagle, Elena Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: The manufacture of multipotential stromal cell (MSC)-based products is costly; therefore, a rapid evaluation of bone marrow (BM) 'quality' with respect to MSC content is desirable. The aim of this study was to develop a rapid single-platform assay to quantify MSC in BM aspirates.
METHODS: Aspirated MSC were enumerated using the CD45(-/low) CD271(bright) phenotype and AccuCheck counting beads and compared with a classic colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay. The phenotype of CD45(-/low) CD271(bright) cells was defined using a range of MSC (CD73, CD105, CD90) and non-MSC (CD31, CD33, CD34, CD19) markers. The effect of aspirated BM volume on MSC yield was also determined.
RESULTS: CD45(-/low) CD271(bright) cells had a classic MSC phenotype (CD73(+) CD105(+) CD90(+)). Their numbers correlated positively with CFU-F counted manually (R = 0.81, P < 0.001) or using automatic measurements of surface area occupied by colonies (R = 0.66, P < 0.001). Simultaneous enumeration of CD34(+) cells revealed donor variability ranges compatible with standard International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHGE) protocols. Aspirating larger marrow volumes gave a significant several-fold reduction in the frequency of CFU-F and CD45(-/low) CD271(bright) cells per milliliter. Therefore aspirated MSC yields can be maximized through a standardized, low-volume harvesting technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Absolute quantification of CD45(-/low) CD271(bright) cells was found to be a reliable method of predicting CFU-F yields in BM aspirates. This rapid (< 40 min) procedure could be suitable for intra-operative quality control of BM aspirates prior to volume reduction/direct injection in orthopedics. In the production of culture-expanded MSC, this assay could be used to exclude samples containing low numbers of MSC, resulting in improved consistency and quality of manufactured MSC batches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268519     DOI: 10.3109/14653249.2011.651533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  44 in total

1.  Combination of Filtered Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biomimetic Scaffold for the Treatment of Knee Osteochondral Lesions: Cellular and Early Clinical Results of a Single Centre Case Series.

Authors:  Matija Veber; Jan Vogler; Miomir Knežević; Ariana Barlič; Matej Drobnič
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.169

2.  An enzymatic method to rescue mesenchymal stem cells from clotted bone marrow samples.

Authors:  Philipp Schlaefli; Alessandro Bertolo; Cherry Malonzo; Tobias Poetzel; Martin Baur; Frank Steffen; Jivko Stoyanov
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Hematopoietic stem cell and mesenchymal stem cell population size in bone marrow samples depends on patient's age and harvesting technique.

Authors:  Katja Rebolj; Matija Veber; Matej Drobnič; Elvira Maličev
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Soliciting strategies for developing cell-based reference materials to advance mesenchymal stromal cell research and clinical translation.

Authors:  Sowmya Viswanathan; Armand Keating; Robert Deans; Peiman Hematti; Darwin Prockop; David F Stroncek; Glyn Stacey; Dan J Weiss; Christopher Mason; Mahendra S Rao
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 5.  Concise review: optimizing expansion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells for clinical applications.

Authors:  Allison I Hoch; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 6.  Mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations: phenotype, property and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Miaohua Mo; Shan Wang; Ying Zhou; Hong Li; Yaojiong Wu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Bone repair with skeletal stem cells: rationale, progress to date and clinical application.

Authors:  Elena A Jones; Peter V Giannoudis; Dimitrios Kouroupis
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 8.  Growth plate skeletal stem cells and their transition from cartilage to bone.

Authors:  Yuki Matsushita; Wanida Ono; Noriaki Ono
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Multipotential stromal cell abundance in cellular bone allograft: comparison with fresh age-matched iliac crest bone and bone marrow aspirate.

Authors:  Thomas G Baboolal; Sally A Boxall; Yasser M El-Sherbiny; Timothy A Moseley; Richard J Cuthbert; Peter V Giannoudis; Dennis McGonagle; Elena Jones
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 10.  A Review of Commercially Available Point-of-Care Devices to Concentrate Bone Marrow for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Focal Cartilage Lesions.

Authors:  Florian Gaul; William D Bugbee; Heinz R Hoenecke; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.