Literature DB >> 22268371

Benefiting from a migratory prey: spatio-temporal patterns in allochthonous subsidization of an Arctic predator.

Marie-Andrée Giroux1, Dominique Berteaux, Nicolas Lecomte, Gilles Gauthier, Guillaume Szor, Joël Bêty.   

Abstract

1. Flows of nutrients and energy across ecosystem boundaries have the potential to subsidize consumer populations and modify the dynamics of food webs, but how spatio-temporal variations in autochthonous and allochthonous resources affect consumers' subsidization remains largely unexplored. 2. We studied spatio-temporal patterns in the allochthonous subsidization of a predator living in a relatively simple ecosystem. We worked on Bylot Island (Nunavut, Canada), where arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus L.) feed preferentially on lemmings (Lemmus trimucronatus and Dicrostonyx groenlandicus Traill), and alternatively on colonial greater snow geese (Anser caerulescens atlanticus L.). Geese migrate annually from their wintering grounds (where they feed on farmlands and marshes) to the Canadian Arctic, thus generating a strong flow of nutrients and energy across ecosystem boundaries. 3. We examined the influence of spatial variations in availability of geese on the diet of fox cubs (2003-2005) and on fox reproductive output (1996-2005) during different phases of the lemming cycle. 4. Using stable isotope analysis and a simple statistical routine developed to analyse the outputs of a multisource mixing model (SIAR), we showed that the contribution of geese to the diet of arctic fox cubs decreased with distance from the goose colony. 5. The probability that a den was used for reproduction by foxes decreased with distance from the subsidized goose colony and increased with lemming abundance. When lemmings were highly abundant, the effect of distance from the colony disappeared. The goose colony thus generated a spatial patterning of reproduction probability of foxes, while the lemming cycle generated a strong temporal variation of reproduction probability of foxes. 6. This study shows how the input of energy owing to the large-scale migration of prey affects the functional and reproductive responses of an opportunistic consumer, and how this input is spatially and temporally modulated through the foraging behaviour of the consumer. Thus, perspectives of both landscape and foraging ecology are needed to fully resolve the effects of subsidies on animal demographic processes and population dynamics.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268371     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01944.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  14 in total

1.  Population limitation in a non-cyclic arctic fox population in a changing climate.

Authors:  Snæbjörn Pálsson; Páll Hersteinsson; Ester R Unnsteinsdóttir; Ólafur K Nielsen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  El Niño/Southern Oscillation-driven rainfall pulse amplifies predation by owls on seabirds via apparent competition with mice.

Authors:  Sarah K Thomsen; David M Mazurkiewicz; Thomas R Stanley; David J Green
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research - exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics.

Authors:  Florian Jeltsch; Dries Bonte; Guy Pe'er; Björn Reineking; Peter Leimgruber; Niko Balkenhol; Boris Schröder; Carsten M Buchmann; Thomas Mueller; Niels Blaum; Damaris Zurell; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Thorsten Wiegand; Jana A Eccard; Heribert Hofer; Jette Reeg; Ute Eggers; Silke Bauer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  Migratory herds of wildebeests and zebras indirectly affect calf survival of giraffes.

Authors:  Derek E Lee; Bernard M Kissui; Yustina A Kiwango; Monica L Bond
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Landscape heterogeneity drives intra-population niche variation and reproduction in an arctic top predator.

Authors:  Vincent L'hérault; Alastair Franke; Nicolas Lecomte; Adam Alogut; Joël Bêty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The marine side of a terrestrial carnivore: intra-population variation in use of allochthonous resources by arctic foxes.

Authors:  Arnaud Tarroux; Joël Bêty; Gilles Gauthier; Dominique Berteaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Seasonal foraging ecology of non-migratory cougars in a system with migrating prey.

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Patrick E Lendrum; Jesse Newby; Howard Quigley; Derek Craighead
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Presence of Breeding Birds Improves Body Condition for a Crocodilian Nest Protector.

Authors:  Lucas A Nell; Peter C Frederick; Frank J Mazzotti; Kent A Vliet; Laura A Brandt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Response of pumas (Puma concolor) to migration of their primary prey in Patagonia.

Authors:  Maria L Gelin; Lyn C Branch; Daniel H Thornton; Andrés J Novaro; Matthew J Gould; Anthony Caragiulo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Toward a mechanistic understanding of animal migration: incorporating physiological measurements in the study of animal movement.

Authors:  David S Jachowski; Navinder J Singh
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.