Literature DB >> 22268168

Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?

Anna Linda1, Chiara Zuiani, Alessandro Furlan, Michele Lorenzon, Viviana Londero, Rossano Girometti, Massimo Bazzocchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether breast MRI can be used to rule out malignancy in patients with high-risk lesions diagnosed at imaging-guided core needle biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were women consecutively registered between October 2004 and April 2010 who had high-risk lesions diagnosed at mammographically or sonographically guided core needle biopsy and subsequently underwent MRI and surgical excision. MR images were reviewed by two experienced breast radiologists. Lesions assessed as BI-RADS category 1-3 were considered negative for malignancy, and BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were considered malignant. Histologic findings at surgical excision were the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MRI in the detection of associated malignancy were calculated for the entire set of lesions and for each histologic subtype.
RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 169 high-risk lesions in 166 patients. At MRI analysis, 116 (68.6%) lesions were considered negative for malignancy, and the other 53 (31.4%) malignant. At surgical excision, 22 malignant lesions were found. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MRI were 72.7% (16/22), 74.8% (110/147), 30.2% (16/53), and 94.8% (110/116). The negative predictive values for papilloma, radial scar, lobular neoplasia, and atypical ductal hyperplasia were 97.4% (38/39), 97.6% (41/42), 88.0% (22/25), and 90.0% (9/10).
CONCLUSION: Patients with high-risk lesions associated with the lowest likelihood of malignancy (papilloma and radial scar) and without suspicious MRI findings can safely undergo follow-up instead of surgery. Because of the low negative predictive value, however, MRI is not helpful in cases of lobular neoplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia, and all these lesions should be excised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22268168     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

1.  Clinical Images: Radial Scar of the Breast.

Authors:  Dana H Smetherman; Lena Fathi Gowharji
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Value of breast MRI for patients with a biopsy showing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).

Authors:  Keiko Tsuchiya; Naoko Mori; David V Schacht; Deepa Sheth; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions: a clinicopathologic correlation study from a single institution.

Authors:  Aziza Nassar; Amy L Conners; Betul Celik; Sarah M Jenkins; Carin Y Smith; Tina J Hieken
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 5.  Use of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities in Modern Screening, Diagnostics and Management of Breast Tumours 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gábor Forrai; Eszter Kovács; Éva Ambrózay; Miklós Barta; Katalin Borbély; Zsolt Lengyel; Katalin Ormándi; Zoltán Péntek; Tasnádi Tünde; Éva Sebő
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.874

6.  Underestimation rate of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Stefano Meroni; Meroni Stefano; Anna Carla Bozzini; Bozzini Anna Carla; Giancarlo Pruneri; Pruneri Giancarlo; Oana Codrina Moscovici; Moscovici Oana Codrina; Patrick Maisonneuve; Maisonneuve Patrick; Simona Menna; Menna Simona; Silvia Penco; Penco Silvia; Lorenza Meneghetti; Meneghetti Lorenza; Giuseppe Renne; Renne Giuseppe; Enrico Cassano; Cassano Enrico
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic value of radiomics and machine learning with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia in predicting malignant upgrade.

Authors:  Roberto Lo Gullo; Kerri Vincenti; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Peter Gibbs; Michael J Fox; Isaac Daimiel; Danny F Martinez; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth A Morris; Jeffrey S Reiner; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Bennani-Baiti; Nabila Bennani-Baiti; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Annika Keulers; Kevin Strobel; Hannah Schneider; Nadine Gaisa; Simone Schrading
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Validation of a scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia using an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Jisun Kim; Wonshik Han; Eun-Young Go; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Soo Kyung Ahn; Hee-Chul Shin; Jee-Man You; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.