Literature DB >> 22267884

Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults.

Melanie L Glocker1, Daniel D Langleben, Kosha Ruparel, James W Loughead, Ruben C Gur, Norbert Sachser.   

Abstract

Ethologist Konrad Lorenz proposed that baby schema ('Kindchenschema') is a set of infantile physical features such as the large head, round face and big eyes that is perceived as cute and motivates caretaking behavior in other individuals, with the evolutionary function of enhancing offspring survival. Previous work on this fundamental concept was restricted to schematic baby representations or correlative approaches. Here, we experimentally tested the effects of baby schema on the perception of cuteness and the motivation for caretaking using photographs of infant faces. Employing quantitative techniques, we parametrically manipulated the baby schema content to produce infant faces with high (e.g. round face and high forehead), and low (e. g. narrow face and low forehead) baby schema features that retained all the characteristics of a photographic portrait. Undergraduate students (n = 122) rated these infants' cuteness and their motivation to take care of them. The high baby schema infants were rated as more cute and elicited stronger motivation for caretaking than the unmanipulated and the low baby schema infants. This is the first experimental proof of the baby schema effects in actual infant faces. Our findings indicate that the baby schema response is a critical function of human social cognition that may be the basis of caregiving and have implications for infant-caretaker interactions.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22267884      PMCID: PMC3260535          DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01603.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethology        ISSN: 0179-1613            Impact factor:   1.897


  8 in total

1.  [Experimental studies of the infant body image].

Authors:  B Hückstedt
Journal:  Z Exp Angew Psychol       Date:  1965

2.  Young adults' caregiving and the age level of a potential recipient.

Authors:  T R Alley; R M Baron
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1986-11

3.  Adults' responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness.

Authors:  K A Hildebrandt; H E Fitzgerald
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Adults' responses to infants varying in appearance of age and attractiveness.

Authors:  J M Ritter; R J Casey; J H Langlois
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1991-02

5.  Sex differences in interest in infants across the lifespan : A biological adaptation for parenting?

Authors:  Dario Maestripieri; Suzanne Pelka
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-09

6.  The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Volk; Vernon L Quinsey
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-12

7.  Baby beautiful: adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness.

Authors:  C W Stephan; J H Langlois
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-04

8.  Adult preferences for infantile facial features: an ethological approach.

Authors:  S H Sternglanz; J L Gray; M Murakami
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 2.844

  8 in total
  78 in total

1.  Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Melanie L Glocker; Daniel D Langleben; Kosha Ruparel; James W Loughead; Jeffrey N Valdez; Mark D Griffin; Norbert Sachser; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human face processing is tuned to sexual age preferences.

Authors:  J Ponseti; O Granert; T van Eimeren; O Jansen; S Wolff; K Beier; G Deuschl; H Bosinski; H Siebner
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Development of Preferences for Differently Aged Faces of Different Races.

Authors:  Michelle Heron-Delaney; Paul C Quinn; Fabrice Damon; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2017-07-03

Review 4.  Behavioural profiles are shaped by social experience: when, how and why.

Authors:  Norbert Sachser; Sylvia Kaiser; Michael B Hennessy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Adults with siblings like children's faces more than those without.

Authors:  Lizhu Luo; Keith M Kendrick; Hong Li; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-10-11

6.  Sustained opioid antagonism modulates striatal sensitivity to baby schema in opioid use disorder.

Authors:  An-Li Wang; Steven B Lowen; Igor Elman; Zhenhao Shi; Victoria P Fairchild; Alexander Bouril; Ruben C Gur; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-10-18

7.  An adult face bias in infants that is modulated by face race.

Authors:  Michelle Heron-Delaney; Fabrice Damon; Paul C Quinn; David Méary; Naiqi G Xiao; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2016-06-06

8.  Reported maternal tendencies predict the reward value of infant facial cuteness, but not cuteness detection.

Authors:  Amanda C Hahn; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 9.  Why Only Humans Shed Emotional Tears : Evolutionary and Cultural Perspectives.

Authors:  Asmir Gračanin; Lauren M Bylsma; Ad J J M Vingerhoets
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2018-06

10.  Attentional prioritization of infant faces is limited to own-race infants.

Authors:  John Hodsoll; Kimberly A Quinn; Sara Hodsoll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.