Literature DB >> 22267818

Variation in colorectal cancer screening steps in primary care: basis for practice improvement.

Mona Sarfaty1, Ronald E Myers, Daniel M Harris, Amanda E Borsky, Randa Sifri, James Cocroft, Brian Stello, Melanie Johnson.   

Abstract

No published research has assessed the specific steps that primary care practices actually take to carry out screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). A written survey was distributed to clinicians and staff at 15 primary care practices to determine whether they perceived that personnel in their practices performed a series of 4 steps associated with screening colonoscopy and 7 steps associated with stool blood test screening. For each discrete step, the percentage of respondents from each practice who indicated that a given step is performed in that practice was calculated along with the mean of practice percentages. Survey results indicate wide variation in the degree to which these screening steps are performed across the 15 practices.  Variation was greater for steps that involved contacting nonresponders (reminders), scheduling, and rescheduling. Survey responses suggest substantial variation and much room for improvement in practice performance of evidence-based steps in the CRC screening process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22267818     DOI: 10.1177/1062860611432302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  4 in total

1.  Formative Evaluation to Assess Communication Technology Access and Health Communication Preferences of Alaska Native People.

Authors:  Renee F Robinson; Denise A Dillard; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julia J Smith; Steve Tierney; Jaedon P Avey; Dedra S Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Indig Health       Date:  2015

2.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH).

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Laura Mae Baldwin; Leah Tuzzio; Sheryl Catz; Alison Cole; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Physicians, clinics, and neighborhoods: multiple levels of influence on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Tammy Leonard; Song Zhang; Mario Schootman; Ethan A Halm; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of care.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Heather M Edwards; Veronica Chollette; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.