Literature DB >> 22267158

Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: a Canadian perspective.

Jennifer J Harrison1, Jeffrey R Schiff, Christian J Coursol, Christopher J A Daley, Anne I Dipchand, Norine M Heywood, Tammy M Keough-Ryan, Paul A Keown, Gary A Levy, Dale C Lien, Jenny R Wichart, Marcelo Cantarovich.   

Abstract

The introduction of generic immunosuppressant medications may present an opportunity for cost savings in solid organ transplantation if equivalent clinical outcomes to the branded counterparts can be achieved. An interprofessional working group of the Canadian Society of Transplantation was established to develop recommendations on the use of generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) based on a review of the available data. Under current Health Canada licensing requirements, a demonstration of bioequivalence with the branded formulation in healthy volunteers allows for bridging of clinical data. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus are designated as "critical dose drugs" and are held to stricter criteria. However, whether this provides sufficient guarantee of therapeutic equivalence in SOTR remains controversial, and failure to maintain an appropriate balance of immunosuppression may have serious consequences, including rejection, graft loss, and death. Published evidence supporting therapeutic equivalence of generic formulations in SOTR is lacking. Moreover, in the setting of multiple generic formulations the potential for uncontrolled product switching is a major concern, since generic preparations are not required to demonstrate bioequivalence with each other. Although close monitoring is recommended with any change in formulation, drug product switches are likely to occur without prescriber knowledge and may pose a significant patient safety risk. The advent of generic immunosuppression will require new practices including more frequent therapeutic drug and clinical monitoring, and increased patient education. The additional workload placed on transplant centers without additional funding will create challenges and could ultimately jeopardize patient outcomes. Until more robust clinical data are available and adequate regulatory safeguards are instituted, caution in the use of generic immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22267158     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182445e9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations.

Authors:  Simon Tremblay; Rita R Alloway
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Generic immunosuppressants.

Authors:  Mara Medeiros; Julia Lumini; Noah Stern; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Guido Filler
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Therapeutic monitoring of pediatric renal transplant patients with conversion to generic cyclosporin.

Authors:  Natalia Riva; Paulo Caceres Guido; Juan Ibañez; Nieves Licciardone; Marcela Rousseau; Gabriel Mato; Marta Monteverde; Paula Schaiquevich
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-05-27

4.  The future developments in hepatology: no need for a jaundiced view.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Elsharkawy; Mark Hudson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-31

5.  Activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ counteracts sepsis-induced T cell cytotoxicity toward alloantigenic target cells.

Authors:  Andreas von Knethen; Lisa Katharina Sha; Tilo Knape; Laura Kuchler; Annika Klara Giegerich; Martin Schulz; Ingeborg A Hauser; Bernhard Brüne
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  A randomized pharmacokinetic study of generic tacrolimus versus reference tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  R R Alloway; B Sadaka; J Trofe-Clark; A Wiland; R D Bloom
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Jessica E Ericson; Kanecia O Zimmerman; Daniel Gonzalez; Chiara Melloni; Jeffrey T Guptill; Kevin D Hill; Huali Wu; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Investigation into the interchangeability of generic formulations using immunosuppressants and a broad selection of medicines.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Steven Teerenstra; Cees Neef; David Burger; Marc Maliepaard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  A comparison of the extended-release and standard-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a 12-month outcome study.

Authors:  Helen Fanous; Rebecca Zheng; Carolyn Campbell; Michael Huang; Michelle M Nash; Lindita Rapi; Jeffrey S Zaltzman; G V Ramesh Prasad
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2012-01-01

10.  Efficiency of Original versus Generic Intravenous Iron Formulations in Patients on Haemodialysis.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Agüera; Alejandro Martin-Malo; Maria Antonia Alvarez-Lara; Victoria Eugenia Garcia-Montemayor; Petra Canton; Sagrario Soriano; Pedro Aljama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.