Literature DB >> 22266743

Physiologic alterations and predictors of performance in a 160-km ultramarathon.

Zachary C Landman1, Geri O Landman, Pedram Fatehi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe physiologic alterations in runners competing in a 160-km endurance event and to evaluate the utility of weight and blood pressure measurements in the assessment of runner performance.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: One hundred sixty-km ultramarathon. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one of the 101 participants in the 2010 Tahoe Rim 100 Mile Endurance Run. ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Brachial blood pressure, heart rate, and weight were assessed before competition, at 80 km, and at 160 km. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Alterations in brachial blood pressure, heart rate, and weight were assessed in finishers. Weight loss, brachial blood pressure, pulse pressure, and heart rate at 80 km were assessed in all participants for their ability to predict failure to finish the race.
RESULTS: Participants who finished 160 km (57%) experienced their fastest heart rates (P < 0.05), lowest systolic pressures (P < 0.05), highest diastolic pressures (P < 0.05), narrowest pulse pressures (P < 0.05), and lowest weights (P < 0.05) at 80 km. High rates of finishing were seen in those who lost >5% of their prerace weight (87%). Categorical weight loss (<3%, 3%-5%, and >5%) was not associated with the ability to finish (P > 0.05) or finishing time (P > 0.05), whereas the presence of a narrow pulse pressure was associated with a high likelihood (likelihood ratio = 9.84; P = 0.002) of failure to finish.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater intracompetition weight loss is not associated with impaired performance but rather may be an aspect of superior performance. Narrow pulse pressure was associated with a high likelihood of failure to finish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22266743     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318243ffdc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  4 in total

1.  Hydration Status as a Predictor of High-altitude Mountaineering Performance.

Authors:  Eric Ladd; Katherine M Shea; Patrick Bagley; Sean Rundell; Paul S Auerbach; Elizabeth A Pirrotta; Ewen Wang; Grant S Lipman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-12-07

Review 2.  Physiology and Pathophysiology in Ultra-Marathon Running.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle; Pantelis T Nikolaidis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 3.  Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia in Endurance and Ultra-Endurance Performance-Aspects of Sex, Race Location, Ambient Temperature, Sports Discipline, and Length of Performance: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle; Daniela Chlíbková; Sousana Papadopoulou; Maria Mantzorou; Thomas Rosemann; Pantelis T Nikolaidis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Participation and performance trends in ultra-endurance running races under extreme conditions - 'Spartathlon' versus 'Badwater'.

Authors:  Kristina da Fonseca-Engelhardt; Beat Knechtle; Christoph Alexander Rüst; Patrizia Knechtle; Romuald Lepers; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  Extrem Physiol Med       Date:  2013-05-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.