Literature DB >> 22266158

Culture-independent exploration of the teat apex microbiota of dairy cows reveals a wide bacterial species diversity.

Gorik Braem1, Sarne De Vliegher, Bert Verbist, Marc Heyndrickx, Frédéric Leroy, Luc De Vuyst.   

Abstract

Due to their close proximity to the mammary gland tissue, the bacterial communities lining the teat apex of the udders from lactating cows influence udder health. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of the amplified V3 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene was used as a culture-independent method to reveal the bacterial composition of 48 samples originating from the teat apices of twelve Friesian-Holstein dairy cows suffering from clinical mastitis in one quarter. The microbiota belonged to four bacterial phyla: the Actinobacteria (32% of all genera), the Bacteroidetes (1%), the Firmicutes (42%), and the Proteobacteria (25%), encompassing 17 bacterial genera. Some differences in occurrence of these genera were seen when comparing quarters that were non-infected (n=22), subclinically infected (n=14), or clinically infected (n=12). Besides commensal skin-associated bacteria, opportunistic pathogenic bacteria, and mastitis-causing pathogens were found as well. The species diversity varied considerably among the most prevalent bacterial genera. While Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus displayed a large diversity among the recovered sequences, indicating the possible presence of a variety of different species, only a single bacterial species (represented by one sequence) was obtained for the genera Aerococcus, Acinetobacter, and Psychrobacter. In conclusion, introducing culture-independent analysis of teat apical skin swabs in mastitis research revealed an unexpected wide bacterial diversity, with variations between quarters with a different clinical status. In addition to potential mastitis-causing pathogens, it exposed the yet poorly mapped presence of skin-associated and other bacteria residing in close proximity to the mammary gland tissue. PCR-DGGE may thus be considered as a useful tool for the entanglement of animal skin microbiota, in casu the teat apices of dairy cows.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22266158     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  21 in total

1.  Impacts of Seasonal Housing and Teat Preparation on Raw Milk Microbiota: a High-Throughput Sequencing Study.

Authors:  Conor J Doyle; David Gleeson; Paul W O'Toole; Paul D Cotter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Changes in bovine milk bacterial microbiome from healthy and subclinical mastitis affected animals of the Girolando, Gyr, Guzera, and Holstein breeds.

Authors:  Raphael S Steinberg; Lilian C Silva E Silva; Marcelo R de Souza; Ronaldo B Reis; Patrícia C L da Silva; Gustavo A Lacorte; Jacques R Nicoli; Elisabeth Neumann; Álvaro C Nunes
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.097

3.  Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Ameliorates Escherichia coli-Induced Inflammation and Cell Damage via Attenuation of ASC-Independent NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Ming-Chao Liu; Jun Yang; Jiu-Feng Wang; Yao-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bovine Teat Microbiome Analysis Revealed Reduced Alpha Diversity and Significant Changes in Taxonomic Profiles in Quarters with a History of Mastitis.

Authors:  Hélène Falentin; Lucie Rault; Aurélie Nicolas; Damien S Bouchard; Jacques Lassalas; Philippe Lamberton; Jean-Marc Aubry; Pierre-Guy Marnet; Yves Le Loir; Sergine Even
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Mammary microbiota of dairy ruminants: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Pascal Rainard
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 6.  The Biodiversity of the Microbiota Producing Heat-Resistant Enzymes Responsible for Spoilage in Processed Bovine Milk and Dairy Products.

Authors:  Solimar G Machado; François Baglinière; Sophie Marchand; Els Van Coillie; Maria C D Vanetti; Jan De Block; Marc Heyndrickx
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Development of the tonsillar microbiome in pigs from newborn through weaning.

Authors:  Luis Carlos Pena Cortes; Rhiannon M LeVeque; Julie Funk; Terence L Marsh; Martha H Mulks
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Integrated Phenotypic-Genotypic Analysis of Candidate Probiotic Weissella Cibaria Strains Isolated from Dairy Cows in Kuwait.

Authors:  Vania Patrone; Tahani Al-Surrayai; Francesco Romaniello; Alessandra Fontana; Giovanni Milani; Valeria Sagheddu; Edoardo Puglisi; Maria Luisa Callegari; Hamad Al-Mansour; Mohamed Waheed Kishk; Lorenzo Morelli
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 9.  How Can We Define "Optimal Microbiota?": A Comparative Review of Structure and Functions of Microbiota of Animals, Fish, and Plants in Agriculture.

Authors:  Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo; Sylvia Brugman; Craig H Warden; Johanna M J Rebel; Gert Folkerts; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-10-02

10.  Insights Into the Bovine Milk Microbiota in Dairy Farms With Different Incidence Rates of Subclinical Mastitis.

Authors:  Maoda Pang; Xing Xie; Hongduo Bao; Lichang Sun; Tao He; Hang Zhao; Yan Zhou; Lili Zhang; Hui Zhang; Ruicheng Wei; Kaizhou Xie; Ran Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.