BACKGROUND: Cardiac remodelling following myocardial infarction (MI) is a complex, dynamic process. There have been few longitudinal studies of these changes. METHODS: A 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was performed on 20 rabbits, before and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after MI (n = 14) and twice for controls (n = 6). Chronic left ventricular (LV) infarct size was histologically characterized and correlated with mechanical function. A linear mixed model was used to analyze longitudinal and infarct size-related changes in LV end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), ejection fraction (EF), sphericity, circumferential strain, and wall motion score index. RESULTS: Mean LV infarct size was 28.9% ± 9.3%. After MI, rapid remodelling occurred in LVESV, LVEF, and sphericity for 2 weeks and LVEDV for 4 weeks, with slower changes afterwards. LV infarct size correlated with LVESV (r = 0.76), LVEDV (r = 0.71), and LVEF (r = 0.69). Larger infarcts resulted in greater LVESV dilation (P = 0.04) and faster LVEDV (P < 0.01), LVEF (P < 0.01), and sphericity (P < 0.01) remodelling. Apical global circumferential strain and wall motion score index increased for 1 week, then stabilized, regardless of infarct size, and apical global circumferential strain was correlated with apical infarction (r = 0.58). Additionally, regional circumferential strain decreased in segments with severe (> 80%) infarction more quickly (P < 0.01) and by a greater degree (P = 0.04) compared with segments with minor (< 20%) infarction. CONCLUSIONS: The most dynamic remodelling of cardiac function in this model occurred during the first 4 weeks, stabilizing thereafter, with changes maintained up to 12 weeks. Infarct size affected both the early rate and long-term extent of mechanical remodelling. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND:Cardiac remodelling following myocardial infarction (MI) is a complex, dynamic process. There have been few longitudinal studies of these changes. METHODS: A 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was performed on 20 rabbits, before and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after MI (n = 14) and twice for controls (n = 6). Chronic left ventricular (LV) infarct size was histologically characterized and correlated with mechanical function. A linear mixed model was used to analyze longitudinal and infarct size-related changes in LV end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), ejection fraction (EF), sphericity, circumferential strain, and wall motion score index. RESULTS: Mean LV infarct size was 28.9% ± 9.3%. After MI, rapid remodelling occurred in LVESV, LVEF, and sphericity for 2 weeks and LVEDV for 4 weeks, with slower changes afterwards. LV infarct size correlated with LVESV (r = 0.76), LVEDV (r = 0.71), and LVEF (r = 0.69). Larger infarcts resulted in greater LVESV dilation (P = 0.04) and faster LVEDV (P < 0.01), LVEF (P < 0.01), and sphericity (P < 0.01) remodelling. Apical global circumferential strain and wall motion score index increased for 1 week, then stabilized, regardless of infarct size, and apical global circumferential strain was correlated with apical infarction (r = 0.58). Additionally, regional circumferential strain decreased in segments with severe (> 80%) infarction more quickly (P < 0.01) and by a greater degree (P = 0.04) compared with segments with minor (< 20%) infarction. CONCLUSIONS: The most dynamic remodelling of cardiac function in this model occurred during the first 4 weeks, stabilizing thereafter, with changes maintained up to 12 weeks. Infarct size affected both the early rate and long-term extent of mechanical remodelling. Copyright Â
Authors: Li Li; Vladimir Nikolski; Don W Wallick; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-05-06 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Selwyn P Wong; John K French; Anna-Maria Lydon; Samuel O M Manda; Wanzhen Gao; Noel G Ashton; Harvey D White Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2004-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Junya Takagawa; Yan Zhang; Maelene L Wong; Richard E Sievers; Neel K Kapasi; Yan Wang; Yerem Yeghiazarians; Randall J Lee; William Grossman; Matthew L Springer Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2007-03-08
Authors: M Dan McKirnan; Yasuhiro Ichikawa; Zheng Zhang; Alice E Zemljic-Harpf; Sili Fan; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Hemal H Patel; H Kirk Hammond; David M Roth Journal: Life Sci Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 5.037
Authors: Kenya Kusunose; Marc S Penn; Youhua Zhang; Yuanna Cheng; James D Thomas; Thomas H Marwick; Zoran B Popović Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cristiano Spadaccio; Francesco Nappi; Federico De Marco; Pietro Sedati; Chiara Taffon; Antonio Nenna; Anna Crescenzi; Massimo Chello; Marcella Trombetta; Ivancarmine Gambardella; Alberto Rainer Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Yuanbo Feng; Bianca Hemmeryckx; Liesbeth Frederix; Marleen Lox; Jun Wu; Ward Heggermont; Hua Rong Lu; David Gallacher; Raymond Oyen; H Roger Lijnen; Yicheng Ni Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2018-09