Literature DB >> 22265770

Operative guidelines for the reconstruction of the native glenoid plane: an anatomic three-dimensional computed tomography-scan reconstruction study.

Tom R G M Verstraeten1, Ellen Deschepper, Matthijs Jacxsens, Stig Walravens, Brecht De Coninck, Lieven F De Wilde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the native plane in biconcave eroded glenoids is difficult. Nevertheless, accurate reconstruction of this plane is imperative for successful total shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to determine guidelines that can increase the accuracy of glenoid component positioning.
METHODS: Three different circular planes were determined on 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans of 152 healthy shoulders. First, the circular max (CM) plane is formed with the superior tubercle and 2 points, 1 anterior and 1 posterior, at the rim of the inferior third of the glenoid. Second, the circular inferior (CI) plane is formed by 3 points at the inferior 2 quadrants of the glenoid rim. Third, the circular minima (Cm) plane is formed with 3 points situated at the noneroded sector of the anterior glenoid. The angulation of the spinal scapular axis (SSA), the line between the most medial point of the scapular spine and the center of the three different glenoid planes, and the correlation coefficient between the radius of the circle and the length of SSA are calculated.
RESULTS: Angle SSA in the x-axis were 94°, 93°, 93° and in the y-axis were 95°, 111°, and 111° for CM, CI, and Cm, respectively. Correlation coefficient between the radius of the circle and the length of SSA: r = 0.69 for CM, r = 0.75 for CI, and r = 0.75 for Cm.
CONCLUSION: Three points situated at the native anterior glenoid can reconstruct, within 2° accuracy (95% confidence interval, 1.8°-2.3°), the CI plane. A relationship exists between the radii of the 3 glenoid circles and the width of the scapula (SSA length).
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22265770     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle.

Authors:  Thomas Suter; Ariane Gerber Popp; Yue Zhang; Chong Zhang; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Variability in total shoulder arthroplasty planning software compared to a control CT-derived 3D printed scapula.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Shawn Sahota; Patrick J Denard; Matthew T Provencher; Bradford O Parsons; Robert U Hartzler; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-12-02

3.  Can an extracorporeal glenoid aiming device be used to optimize the position of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tom R G M Verstraeten; Bart Berghs; Alexander Van Tongel; David Volders; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  Humeral head subluxation in Walch type B shoulders varies across imaging modalities.

Authors:  Bogdan A Matache; Naser Alnusif; Jean Chaoui; Gilles Walch; George S Athwal
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-10-10

5.  Consequences of reaming with flat and convex reamers for bone volume and surface area of the glenoid; a basic science study.

Authors:  Anne Karelse; Steven Leuridan; Alexander Van Tongel; Philippe Debeer; Jos Van Der Sloten; Kathleen Denis; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  The Normal 3D Gleno-humeral Relationship and Anatomy of the Glenoid Planes.

Authors:  Tom Verstraeten; Lieven De Wilde; Jan Victor
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.