Literature DB >> 22265644

Quality of pharmaceutical advertising and gender bias in medical journals (1998-2008): a review of the scientific literature.

Belén Cambronero Saiz1, María Teresa Ruiz Cantero, Natalia Papí Gálvez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the scientific literature on pharmaceutical advertising aimed at health professionals in order to determine whether gender bias has decreased and the quality of information in pharmaceutical advertising has improved over time.
METHODS: We performed a content analysis of original articles dealing with medical drug promotion (1998-2008), according to quality criteria such as (a) the number, validity and accessibility of bibliographic references provided in pharmaceutical advertising and (b) the extent to which gender representations were consistent with the prevalence of the diseases. Databases: PUBMED, Medline, Scopus, Sociological Abstract, Eric and LILACS.
RESULTS: We reviewed 31 articles that analyzed advertising in medical journals from 1975-2005 and were published between 1998 and 2008. We found that the number of references used to support pharmaceutical advertising claims increased from 1975 but that 50% of these references were not valid. There was a tendency to depict men in paid productive roles, while women appeared inside the home or in non-occupational social contexts. Advertisements for psychotropic and cardiovascular drugs overrepresented women and men respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of bibliographic references increased between 1998 and 2008. However, representation of traditional male-female roles was similar in 1975 and 2005. Pharmaceutical advertisements may contribute to reinforcing the perception that certain diseases are associated with the most frequently portrayed sex.
Copyright © 2011 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22265644     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gac Sanit        ISSN: 0213-9111            Impact factor:   2.139


  3 in total

1.  Gender policies and advertising and marketing practices that affect women's health.

Authors:  Belén Cambronero-Saiz
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  A step in the right direction, towards a feminist policy analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Gender bias in clinical research, pharmaceutical marketing, and the prescription of drugs.

Authors:  Elisa Chilet-Rosell
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.