Literature DB >> 22265255

Clinical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in the management of stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer.

Lin Gong1, Jian-Yan Lou, Ping Wang, Jia-Wen Zhang, Hui Liu, Zhi-Lan Peng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical efficacy, toxicity, and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery (RS) among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2-IIB.
METHODS: In a retrospective clinical study at West China Second Hospital, Chengdu, data were analyzed from 414 patients who underwent NACT followed by radical surgery (NACT-RS) or RS alone between January 2008 and November 2009.
RESULTS: The clinical response for NACT was 90%. Lymph node metastasis (25% versus 48%, P<0.05) and deep cervical stromal invasion more than 0.5, (68% versus 91%, P<0.05) were significantly lower among responders than among non-responders, respectively, in the NACT-RS group. The 2-year progression-free survival and 2-year overall survival were 93.0% and 95.5% in the NACT-RS group, and 94.5% and 97.1% in the RS group (P>0.05). Parametric infiltration (hazard ratio [HR], 7.668; P<0.05) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 7.714; P<0.05) were independent risk factors for all study patients.
CONCLUSION: Compared with RS, NACT-RS did not show a significant advantage for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the data provide the rationale for assessing NACT-RS in a multicenter randomized clinical trial setting. NACT may be considered as an alternative treatment when radiotherapy is not available. Copyright Â
© 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22265255     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  10 in total

1.  Responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery predicts favorable prognosis for cervical cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Hong-Xin Yuan; Hong-Lin Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler; A Rauer; A Schneider; V Budach; A Tsunoda; M Mangler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  The Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Lymph Node Metastasis of FIGO Stage IB1-IIB Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bingxin Chen; Liming Wang; Ci Ren; Hui Shen; Wencheng Ding; Da Zhu; Lu Mao; Hui Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in woman with early or locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Marcela de la Torre
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-13

6.  Comparison of therapeutic effects of chemo-radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in patients with bulky cervical carcinoma (stage IB3 & IIA2).

Authors:  Setareh Akhavan; Abbas Alibakhshi; Mahdieh Parsapoor; Abbas Alipour; Elahe Rezayof
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery has no therapeutic advantages over concurrent chemoradiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB-IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeongshim Lee; Tae Hyung Kim; Gwi Eon Kim; Ki Chang Keum; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.

Authors:  Chia-Hao Liu; Yu-Chieh Lee; Jeff Chien-Fu Lin; I-San Chan; Na-Rong Lee; Wen-Hsun Chang; Wei-Min Liu; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Ping Liu; Ying Yang; Lu Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiaonong Bin; Jinghe Lang; Chunlin Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Comparison of survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy and direct surgery in IB2/IIA2 cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Peilin Ouyang; Jingting Cai; Lin Gui; Shan Liu; Na-Yi Yuan Wu; Jing Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.