BACKGROUND: Patients requiring discharge to a continuing care facility after cardiac surgery (non-home discharge) frequently have prolonged hospital stays while arrangements are made for posthospital care. We hypothesized that preoperatively identifying patients likely to require non-home discharge would allow earlier discharge planning, shorten length of stay, and thereby reduce resource use. This study sought to develop a validated tool for preoperative planning of non-home discharge. STUDY DESIGN: From October 2008 to December 2009, 4,243 patients were discharged alive after cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic. Of these, 4,031 resided in the 48 contiguous states or Alaska and formed the study cohort. Logistic regression analysis of non-home discharge was performed using preoperative data generally readily available at admission. A subsequent group of 2,005 patients discharged alive from December 2009 to July 2010 was used to validate this model. RESULTS: Eighteen percent of patients had non-home discharge, which was predictable from data readily available at admission for cardiac surgery (C-statistic 0.88 for model development, 0.87 for model validation). The strongest predictors included intra-aortic balloon pumping (odds ratio [OR] 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 32), emergency status (OR 3.7; CI 2.1 to 6.5), older age (p < 0.001), longer preoperative stays (p < 0.001), poor nutritional state (p < 0.001), a number of comorbidities, and descending thoracic aorta procedures (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.5 to 7.4). CONCLUSIONS: Non-home discharge can be easily predicted using data obtained during routine preoperative evaluation of cardiac surgical patients. We expect that early identification of patients at high risk for non-home discharge will allow for more intensive, personalized discharge planning, and will reduce wasted days and resource use.
BACKGROUND:Patients requiring discharge to a continuing care facility after cardiac surgery (non-home discharge) frequently have prolonged hospital stays while arrangements are made for posthospital care. We hypothesized that preoperatively identifying patients likely to require non-home discharge would allow earlier discharge planning, shorten length of stay, and thereby reduce resource use. This study sought to develop a validated tool for preoperative planning of non-home discharge. STUDY DESIGN: From October 2008 to December 2009, 4,243 patients were discharged alive after cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic. Of these, 4,031 resided in the 48 contiguous states or Alaska and formed the study cohort. Logistic regression analysis of non-home discharge was performed using preoperative data generally readily available at admission. A subsequent group of 2,005 patients discharged alive from December 2009 to July 2010 was used to validate this model. RESULTS: Eighteen percent of patients had non-home discharge, which was predictable from data readily available at admission for cardiac surgery (C-statistic 0.88 for model development, 0.87 for model validation). The strongest predictors included intra-aortic balloon pumping (odds ratio [OR] 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 32), emergency status (OR 3.7; CI 2.1 to 6.5), older age (p < 0.001), longer preoperative stays (p < 0.001), poor nutritional state (p < 0.001), a number of comorbidities, and descending thoracic aorta procedures (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.5 to 7.4). CONCLUSIONS: Non-home discharge can be easily predicted using data obtained during routine preoperative evaluation of cardiac surgical patients. We expect that early identification of patients at high risk for non-home discharge will allow for more intensive, personalized discharge planning, and will reduce wasted days and resource use.
Authors: Kathryn H Bowles; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Mary D Naylor; John H Holmes; Susan K Keim; Emilia J Flores Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: Kristinn Thorsteinsson; Jan J Andreasen; Rikke N Mortensen; Kristian Kragholm; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar Gislason; Lars Køber; Kirsten Fonager Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2016-03-10
Authors: Alexandra W Acher; Malcolm H Squires; Ryan C Fields; George A Poultsides; Carl Schmidt; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Timothy M Pawlik; Linda X Jin; Aslam Ejaz; David A Kooby; Mark Bloomston; David Worhunsky; Edward A Levine; Neil Saunders; Emily Winslow; Clifford S Cho; Ken Meredith; Glen Leverson; Shishir K Maithel; Sharon M Weber Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Mariam M AlHilli; Christine W Tran; Carrie L Langstraat; Janice R Martin; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Andrea Mariani; William A Cliby; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-06-29 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Katherine C Lee; Jocelyn Streid; Dan Sturgeon; Stuart Lipsitz; Joel S Weissman; Ronnie A Rosenthal; Dae H Kim; Susan L Mitchell; Zara Cooper Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anuradha Lala; Helena L Chang; Xiaoyu Liu; Eric J Charles; Babatunde A Yerokun; Michael E Bowdish; Vinod H Thourani; Michael J Mack; Marissa A Miller; Patrick T O'Gara; Eugene H Blackstone; Alan J Moskowitz; Annetine C Gelijns; John C Mullen; Lynne W Stevenson Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Christopher A Heid; Mitri K Khoury; Micah A Thornton; Tracy R Geoffrion; Alberto L De Hoyos Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 5.102