Literature DB >> 22265042

Effects of arm position on maximizing intra-articular visualization of the biceps tendon: a cadaveric study.

Nathan D Hart1, S Raymond Golish, Jason L Dragoo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the intra-articular length of the biceps tendon in various shoulder and arm positions and identify the position in which the extra-articular portion of the tendon is maximally visualized within the glenohumeral joint.
METHODS: We measured 18 positions in 4 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders for a total of 72 measurements. In each measurement the position of the proximal biceps tendon was measured relative to a baseline measurement in neutral position (0° shoulder flexion, 0° shoulder abduction, 0° elbow flexion, 0° shoulder rotation). Positions measured ranged between the following: 0° and 30° shoulder flexion; 0° and 40° shoulder abduction; 0° and 90° elbow flexion; and 0° neutral, 30° internal, and 30° external shoulder rotation.
RESULTS: The position creating the greatest increase in intra-articular biceps tendon length from baseline was 30° shoulder flexion, 40° shoulder abduction, 90° elbow flexion, and 0° rotation. On average, 56% of the tendon within the bicipital groove is brought into view by the maximal position relative to baseline. In maximizing intra-articular biceps tendon length, the effect of elbow flexion was highly significant (P < .001) and the combined effect of shoulder flexion-abduction was significant (P = .016).
CONCLUSIONS: The position of 30° shoulder flexion, 40° shoulder abduction, and 90° elbow flexion significantly increases the excursion of the proximal biceps tendon relative to a neutral position. Over 50% of the tendon within the bicipital groove at baseline can be pulled out of the groove by placing the extremity in the maximal position and using an arthroscopic probe. Rotation of the humerus does not improve intra-articular excursion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maximizing the intra-articular tendon length by arm positional change is likely to be useful for arthroscopic examination of the biceps tendon.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22265042     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  5 in total

Review 1.  Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Regional histologic differences in the long head of the biceps tendon following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients with rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions.

Authors:  Sergio A Glait; Siddharth Mahure; Cynthia A Loomis; Michael Cammer; Hien Pham; Andrew Feldman; Laith M Jazrawi; Eric J Strauss
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Injuries of the biceps-labrum complex : Principles, pathologies and treatment concepts].

Authors:  N Hawi; P Habermeyer; R Meller; S Razaeian; C von Falck; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Small-incision open distal subpectoral vs. arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis for biceps long head tendon lesions with repair of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Gang Yi; Jing Yang; Lei Zhang; Yang Liu; Xiaoguang Guo; Shijie Fu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  The role of elbow positioning on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon in the beach chair position.

Authors:  Eugene T Ek; Jennifer N Flynn; Glenn N Boyce; Gayan Padmasekara
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.025

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.