Literature DB >> 22264594

Detection of 18fluoride sodium accumulation by positron emission tomography in calcified stenotic aortic valves.

Fabien Hyafil1, David Messika-Zeitoun, Samuel Burg, François Rouzet, Khadija Benali, Bernard Iung, Alec Vahanian, Dominique Le Guludec.   

Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis progression rate is highly variable among patients and to date remains unpredictable. Evaluation of osteoblastic activity inside aortic valves may help identify patients with fast aortic stenosis progression rates and worse prognoses. Fluoride-18 sodium (FNa) is a clinically approved positron emission tomographic (PET) radiotracer with high and rapid bone uptake. The aim of this study was to test whether FNa accumulates in degenerative aortic valves and can be detected with PET imaging. Five patients with severe aortic stenosis and 10 patients free of aortic valvular calcium on computed tomography underwent PET imaging 40 minutes after the injection of 4 MBq/kg of FNa for oncologic or rheumatologic purposes. Maximal standard uptake values (SUVs) were measured retrospectively in aortic valves using PET imaging. Tissue-to-background ratios were calculated for each patient by dividing the maximal SUV measured in aortic valves by the mean SUV of blood. In patients with severe aortic stenosis, an intense accumulation of FNa was detected in aortic valve region on PET imaging, whereas only low activity was found in patients free of valvular calcification (median maximal SUV 2.6 g/ml/kg [interquartile range (IQR) 2.3 to 3.6] vs 2.0 g/ml/kg [IQR 1.7 to 2.2] and median tissue-to-background ratio 2.2 [IQR 2.0 to 2.7] vs 1.5 [IQR 1.5 to 1.7], respectively, p = 0.008 for both). Intraobserver variability for maximal SUV and tissue-to-background ratio in aortic valves was measured at 0.99 and interobserver variability at 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. In conclusion, in this pilot study, FNa accumulated in patients with severe aortic stenosis and could be quantified on PET imaging with good reproducibility. FNa PET imaging represents a promising imaging modality to evaluate osteoblastic activity inside calcified aortic valves.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22264594     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Effect of pioglitazone on inflammation and calcification in atherosclerotic rabbits : An 18F-FDG-PET/CT in vivo imaging study.

Authors:  J Xu; M Nie; J Li; Z Xu; M Zhang; Y Yan; T Feng; X Zhao; Q Zhao
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Fluoride imaging of atherosclerotic plaques: Moving from macro to microcalcifications?

Authors:  Fabien Hyafil; Warda Ferrag; Chahinez Kefti; Dominique Le Guludec
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Romain Capoulade; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

4.  Genetic Variation in LPA, Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery, and Familial Risk of Aortic Valve Microcalcification.

Authors:  Nicolas Perrot; Sébastien Thériault; Christian Dina; Hao Yu Chen; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Sidwell Rigade; Audrey-Anne Després; Anthony Poulin; Romain Capoulade; Thierry Le Tourneau; David Messika-Zeitoun; Mikaël Trottier; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Maxime Nadeau; James C Engert; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Marc R Dweck; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot; Jean-Jacques Schott; George Thanassoulis; Marie-Annick Clavel; Yohan Bossé; Benoit J Arsenault
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 5.  Visualizing novel concepts of cardiovascular calcification.

Authors:  Jesper Hjortnaes; Sophie E P New; Elena Aikawa
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 6.  Molecular imaging of calcific aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Jae-Joon Jung; Farid Jadbabaie; Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Patrick Mathieu; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  Sodium [¹⁸F]fluoride PET/CT in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Han; Sue Yeon Lim; Min Su Lee; Won Woo Lee
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  18F-Fluoride and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Alex T Vesey; William S A Jenkins; Agnese Irkle; Alastair Moss; Greg Sng; Rachael O Forsythe; Tim Clark; Gemma Roberts; Alison Fletcher; Christophe Lucatelli; James H F Rudd; Anthony P Davenport; Nicholas L Mills; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Martin Dennis; William N Whiteley; Edwin J R van Beek; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Lipoprotein(a), Oxidized Phospholipids, and Aortic Valve Microcalcification Assessed by 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Audrey-Anne Després; Nicolas Perrot; Anthony Poulin; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; Hao Yu Chen; Raphaëlle Bourgeois; Mikaël Trottier; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Maxime Nadeau; James C Engert; Sébastien Thériault; Yohan Bossé; Joseph L Witztum; Patrick Couture; Patrick Mathieu; Marc R Dweck; Sotirios Tsimikas; George Thanassoulis; Philippe Pibarot; Marie-Annick Clavel; Benoit J Arsenault
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2019-04-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.