Literature DB >> 2226453

Comparison of three classes of human liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Emphasis on different substrate binding pockets.

H Eklund1, P Müller-Wille, E Horjales, O Futer, B Holmquist, B L Vallee, J O Höög, R Kaiser, H Jörnvall.   

Abstract

Conformational models of the three characterized classes of mammalian liver alcohol dehydrogenase were constructed using computer graphics based on the known three-dimensional structure of the E subunit of the horse enzyme (class I) and the primary structures of the three human enzyme classes. This correlates the substrate-binding pockets of the class I subunits (alpha, beta and gamma in the human enzyme) with those of the class II and III subunits (pi and chi, respectively) for three enzymes that differ in substrate specificity, inhibition pattern and many other properties. The substrate-binding sites exhibit pronounced differences in both shape and properties. Comparing human class I subunits with those of class II and III subunits there are no less than 8 and 10 replacements, respectively, out of 11 residues in the substrate pocket, while in the human class I isozyme variants, only 1-3 of these 11 positions differ. A single residue, Val294, is conserved throughout. The liver alcohol dehydrogenases, with different substrate-specificity pockets, resemble the patterns of other enzyme families such as the pancreatic serine proteases. The inner part of the substrate cleft in the class II and III enzymes is smaller than in the horse class I enzyme, because both Ser48 and Phe93 are replaced by larger residues, Thr and Tyr, respectively. In class II, the residues in the substrate pocket are larger in about half of the positions. It is rich in aromatic residues, four Phe and one Tyr, making the substrate site distinctly smaller than in the class I subunits. In class III, the inner part of the substrate cleft is narrow but the outer part considerably wider and more polar than in the class I and II enzymes. In addition, Ser (or Thr) and Tyr in class II and III instead of His51 may influence proton abstraction/donation at the active site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2226453     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19337.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  23 in total

1.  Inhibition of nicotinoprotein (NAD+-containing) alcohol dehydrogenase by trans-4-(N,N-dimethylamino)-cinnamaldehyde binding to the active site.

Authors:  Sander R Piersma; Annika Norin; Simon de Vries; Hans Jörnvall; Johannis A Duine
Journal:  J Protein Chem       Date:  2003-07

2.  "Enzymogenesis": classical liver alcohol dehydrogenase origin from the glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase line.

Authors:  O Danielsson; H Jörnvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Progressive sequence alignment and molecular evolution of the Zn-containing alcohol dehydrogenase family.

Authors:  H W Sun; B V Plapp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of a carbonyl reductase from Candida parapsilosis.

Authors:  Rongzhen Zhang; Yan Xu; Ying Sun; Yao Nie; Xiaoqing Mu; Xuemei Li; Xuejun C Zhang; Zhihe Rao
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2008-03-21

5.  Pea formaldehyde-active class III alcohol dehydrogenase: common derivation of the plant and animal forms but not of the corresponding ethanol-active forms (classes I and P).

Authors:  J Shafqat; M El-Ahmad; O Danielsson; M C Martínez; B Persson; X Parés; H Jornvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cloning of the Arabidopsis and rice formaldehyde dehydrogenase genes: implications for the origin of plant ADH enzymes.

Authors:  R Dolferus; J C Osterman; W J Peacock; E S Dennis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The vertebrate alcohol dehydrogenase system: variable class II type form elucidates separate stages of enzymogenesis.

Authors:  L Hjelmqvist; M Estonius; H Jörnvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Crystal structure of cod liver class I alcohol dehydrogenase: substrate pocket and structurally variable segments.

Authors:  S Ramaswamy; M el Ahmad; O Danielsson; H Jörnvall; H Eklund
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  The alcohol dehydrogenase system in the xylose-fermenting yeast Candida maltosa.

Authors:  Yuping Lin; Peng He; Qinhong Wang; Dajun Lu; Zilong Li; Changsheng Wu; Ning Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cloning and high-level expression of the glutathione-independent formaldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  K Ito; M Takahashi; T Yoshimoto; D Tsuru
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.