Literature DB >> 22264199

GABAA agonist reduces visual awareness: a masking-EEG experiment.

Anouk M van Loon1, H Steven Scholte, Simon van Gaal, Björn J J van der Hoort, Victor A F Lamme.   

Abstract

Consciousness can be manipulated in many ways. Here, we seek to understand whether two such ways, visual masking and pharmacological intervention, share a common pathway in manipulating visual consciousness. We recorded EEG from human participants who performed a backward-masking task in which they had to detect a masked figure form its background (masking strength was varied across trials). In a within-subject design, participants received dextromethorphan (a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist), lorazepam (LZP; a GABA(A) receptor agonist), scopolamine (a muscarine receptor antagonist), or placebo. The behavioral results show that detection rate decreased with increasing masking strength and that of all the drugs, only LZP induced a further decrease in detection rate. Figure-related ERP signals showed three neural events of interest: (1) an early posterior occipital and temporal generator (94-121 msec) that was not influenced by any pharmacological manipulation nor by masking, (2) a later bilateral perioccipital generator (156-211 msec) that was reduced by masking as well as LZP (but not by any other drugs), and (3) a late bilateral occipital temporal generator (293-387 msec) that was mainly affected by masking. Crucially, only the intermediate neural event correlated with detection performance. In combination with previous findings, these results suggest that LZP and masking both reduce visual awareness by means of modulating late activity in the visual cortex but leave early activation intact. These findings provide the first evidence for a common mechanism for these two distinct ways of manipulating consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22264199     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

Review 1.  The concept of allosteric interaction and its consequences for the chemistry of the brain.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Magnetoencephalographic activity related to conscious perception is stable within individuals across years but not between individuals.

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Gareth Robert Barnes; Geraint Rees; Morten Overgaard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  GABA predicts time perception.

Authors:  Devin B Terhune; Sonia Russo; Jamie Near; Charlotte J Stagg; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Probing the neurochemical basis of synaesthesia using psychophysics.

Authors:  Devin B Terhune; Seoho M Song; Mihaela D Duta; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Differential Visual Processing of Animal Images, with and without Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Weina Zhu; Jan Drewes; Nicholas A Peatfield; David Melcher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  General anesthesia as a possible GABAergic modulator affects visual processing in children.

Authors:  C Van den Boomen; J C de Graaff; T P V M de Jong; C J Kalkman; C Kemner
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Object substitution masking in schizophrenia: an event-related potential analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan K Wynn; Kristopher I Mathis; Judith Ford; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Michael F Green
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

8.  NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine impairs feature integration in visual perception.

Authors:  Julia D I Meuwese; Anouk M van Loon; H Steven Scholte; Philipp B Lirk; Nienke C C Vulink; Markus W Hollmann; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses.

Authors:  Michael-Paul Schallmo; Alexander M Kale; Rachel Millin; Anastasia V Flevaris; Zoran Brkanac; Richard Ae Edden; Raphael A Bernier; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Genetic influence alters the brain synchronism in perception and timing.

Authors:  Victor Marinho; Thomaz Oliveira; Juliete Bandeira; Giovanny R Pinto; Anderson Gomes; Valéria Lima; Francisco Magalhães; Kaline Rocha; Carla Ayres; Valécia Carvalho; Bruna Velasques; Pedro Ribeiro; Marco Orsini; Victor Hugo Bastos; Daya Gupta; Silmar Teixeira
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.