| Literature DB >> 22262954 |
Ke-Vin Chang1, Wen-Shiang Chen, Ruey-Meei Wu, Ssu-Yuan Chen, Hsiu-Yu Shen, Ching Lan, Yen-Ho Wang.
Abstract
The study aim was to assess sympathetic vasomotor response (SVR) by using pulsed wave Doppler (PWD) ultrasound in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and correlate with the tilt table study. We recruited 18 male patients and 10 healthy men as controls. The SVR of the radial artery was evaluated by PWD, using inspiratory cough as a provocative maneuver. The response to head-up tilt was studied by a tilt table with simultaneous heart rate and blood pressure recording. The hemodynamic variables were compared between groups, and were examined by correlation analysis. Regarding SVR, MSA patients exhibited a prolonged latency and less heart rate acceleration following inspiratory cough. Compared with the tilt table test, the elevation of heart rate upon SVR was positively correlated to the increase of heart rate after head-up tilt. The correlation analysis indicated that the magnitude of blood pressure drop from supine to upright was positively associated with the SVR latency but negatively correlated with the heart rate changes upon SVR. The present study demonstrated that blunted heart rate response might explain MSA's vulnerability to postural challenge. PWD may be used to predict cardiovascular response to orthostatic stress upon head-up tilt in MSA patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22262954 PMCID: PMC3259486 DOI: 10.1100/2012/548529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Change of Doppler wave forms upon sympathetic vasomotor response (SVR). The inspiratory cough causes an artifact (arrow) and decreases systolic blood velocity with a more prominent diastolic reversal. The wave of maximal deflection (arrowhead) was used to represent the hemodynamic status after sympathetic stimulation. The SVR latency indicated the period between the artifact by inspiratory cough to the maximal deflection of Doppler wave forms.
Basic characteristics in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and healthy controls.
| MSA ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 65.1 ± 9.3 | 60.3 ± 7.0 | 0.165 |
| Body height (cm) | 166.1 ± 6.7 | 166.1 ± 7.2 | 0.660 |
| Body weight (kg) | 71.9 ± 10.4 | 68.4 ± 8.0 | 0.452 |
| Disease duration (year) | 3.3 ± 1.8 | ||
| Hoehn-Yahr stage | 3.1 ± 0.9 | ||
| UMSARS I | 14.9 ± 6.8 | ||
| UMSARS II | 28.4 ± 12.1 | ||
| UMSARS IV | 1.2 ± 1.2 |
Note: Values are mean ± S.D.; UMSARS: Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale.
The hemodynamic variables of sympathetic vasomotor response and their corresponding changes at baseline and after inspiratory cough.
| MSA ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Pulsatility index | 5.3 ± 3.4‡ | 4.4 ± 2.5‡ | 0.464 |
|
| 39.0 ± 11.4‡ | 46.2 ± 19.0‡ | 0.356 |
|
| −0.5 ± 4.5‡ | 0.5 ± 6.4‡ | 0.436 |
|
| 10.1 ± 5.6‡ | 14.1 ± 10.2‡ | 0.408 |
|
| 5.2 ± 3.1‡ | 7.0 ± 5.2‡ | 0.436 |
| Flow amount (mL/min) | 20.8 ± 17.6‡ | 30.8 ± 31.2‡ | 0.494 |
| Diameter (mm) | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 0.944 |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 79.6 ± 14.2 | 73.0 ± 9.7‡ | 0.249 |
|
| |||
| Pulsatility index | 7.8 ± 2.2‡ | 8.1 ± 2.0‡ | 0.654 |
|
| 33.3 ± 9.8‡ | 35.6 ± 12.9‡ | 0.654 |
|
| −7.1 ± 2.9‡ | −7.2 ± 3.5‡ | 0.906 |
|
| 4.8 ± 3.7‡ | 5.5 ± 2.3‡ | 0.944 |
|
| 2.6 ± 0.9‡ | 2.7 ± 1.0‡ | 0.944 |
| Flow amount (mL/min) | 8.4 ± 5.2‡ | 8.4 ± 4.8‡ | 0.944 |
| Diameter (mm) | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 0.981 |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 80.1 ± 14.4 | 78.6 ± 8.5‡ | 0.981 |
|
| |||
| Pulsatility index | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 3.6 ± 1.8 | 0.133 |
| Δ | 5.7 ± 5.7 | 10.6 ± 10.9 | 0.454 |
| Δ | 6.5 ± 5.3 | 7.7 ± 5.2 | 0.654 |
| Δ | 5.2 ± 4.2 | 8.5 ± 8.8 | 0.621 |
| Δ | 2.5 ± 2.3 | 4.3 ± 4.5 | 0.524 |
| ΔFlow amount (mL/min) | 12.0 ± 13.0 | 22.4 ± 26.9 | 0.408 |
| ΔDiameter (mm) | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.832 |
| ΔHeart rate (beat/min) | 0.4 ± 3.0* | 5.5 ± 4.0* | 0.001* |
| Latency (s) | 5.1 ± 0.8* | 3.9 ± 0.8* | 0.000* |
Note: Values are mean ± S.D.; MSA: multiple system atrophy; ‡ or * indicated significant difference of hemodynamic measurements between baseline and after inspiratory cough or between MSA and control, respectively.
Figure 2The comparisons of hemodynamic variables between MSA patients and healthy controls. Regarding SVR, MSA patients had (a) lower HR elevation and (b) a prolonged SVR latency. As for the tilt table study, MSA patients had (c) significant drop of SBP and (d) less HR elevation. Note: SVR: sympathetic vasomotor response; MSA: multiple system atrophy; HR: heart rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure.
The hemodynamic variables of the tilt table study and their corresponding changes at supine and after head-up tilt.
| MSA ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 106.6 ± 6.9* | 119.2 ± 16.4‡∗ | 0.016* |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 69.0 ± 6.4 | 71.9 ± 9.6 | 0.408 |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 81.5 ± 6.1 | 87.7 ± 11.4‡ | 0.191 |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 66.7 ± 8.0‡ | 74.9 ± 11.2‡ | 0.064 |
| Peripheral vascular resistance (mmHg·mL−1·s−1) | 27.1 ± 8.2‡ | 24.2 ± 6.0‡ | 0.588 |
|
| |||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 105.2 ± 11.6 | 108.5 ± 17.4‡ | 0.588 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 71.5 ± 9.3 | 68.9 ± 11.5 | 1.000 |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 82.7 ± 9.8 | 82.1 ± 13.1‡ | 0.759 |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 73.2 ± 7.2‡ | 76.9 ± 11.8‡ | 0.356 |
| Peripheral vascular resistance (mmHg·mL−1·s−1) | 52.5 ± 17.1‡ | 46.6 ± 11.6‡ | 0.759 |
|
| |||
| ΔSystolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 1.4 ± 6.0* | 10.7 ± 11.5* | 0.045* |
| ΔDiastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | −2.5 ± 4.5 | 3.0 ± 7.7 | 0.064 |
| ΔMean blood pressure (mmHg) | −1.1 ± 4.9 | 5.5 ± 8.7 | 0.057 |
| ΔHeart rate (beat/min) | 6.4 ± 2.6* | 1.9 ± 2.2* | 0.000* |
| ΔPeripheral vascular resistance (mmHg·mL−1·s−1) | 25.4 ± 14.3 | 22.3 ± 10.6 | 0.944 |
Note: Values are mean ± S.D.; MSA: multiple system atrophy; ‡ or * indicated significant difference of hemodynamic measurements between baseline and after head-up tilt or between MSA and control, respectively.
Figure 3The correlation analysis of hemodynamic variables between SVR and the tilt table study. (a) The HR elevation upon SVR correlated positively with the HR elevation upon head-up tilt (r = 0.520, P = 0.005) but (b) negatively with the SBP drop from supine to tilt (r = −0.414, P = 0.029). The SVR latency demonstrated a positive correlation with (c) the SBP drop and (d) MAP drop after tilting up (r = 0.486, P = 0.009 and r = 0.5, P = 0.007, resp.). Note: SVR: sympathetic vasomotor response; HR: heart rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure.