OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by the local production of antibodies in the CNS and the presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF. Antigen arrays allow the study of antibody reactivity against a large number of antigens using small volumes of fluid with greater sensitivity than ELISA. We investigated whether there were unique autoantibodies in the CSF of patients with MS as measured by antigen arrays and whether these antibodies differed from those in serum. METHODS: We used antigen arrays to analyze the reactivity of antibodies in matched serum and CSF samples of 20 patients with untreated relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 26 methylprednisolone-treated patients with RRMS, and 20 control patients with other noninflammatory neurologic conditions (ONDs) against 334 different antigens including heat shock proteins, lipids, and myelin antigens. RESULTS: We found different antibody signatures in matched CSF and serum samples The targets of these antibodies included epitopes of the myelin antigens CNP, MBP, MOBP, MOG, and PLP (59%), HSP60 and HSP70 (38%), and the 68-kD neurofilament (3%). The antibody response in patients with MS was heterogeneous; CSF antibodies in individual patients reacted with different autoantigens. These autoantibodies were locally synthesized in the CNS and were of the immunoglobulin G class. Finally, we found that treatment with steroids decreased autoantibody reactivity, epitope spreading, and intrathecal autoantibody synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide a new avenue to investigate the local antibody response in the CNS, which may serve as a biomarker to monitor both disease progression and response to therapy in MS.
OBJECTIVE:Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by the local production of antibodies in the CNS and the presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF. Antigen arrays allow the study of antibody reactivity against a large number of antigens using small volumes of fluid with greater sensitivity than ELISA. We investigated whether there were unique autoantibodies in the CSF of patients with MS as measured by antigen arrays and whether these antibodies differed from those in serum. METHODS: We used antigen arrays to analyze the reactivity of antibodies in matched serum and CSF samples of 20 patients with untreated relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 26 methylprednisolone-treated patients with RRMS, and 20 control patients with other noninflammatory neurologic conditions (ONDs) against 334 different antigens including heat shock proteins, lipids, and myelin antigens. RESULTS: We found different antibody signatures in matched CSF and serum samples The targets of these antibodies included epitopes of the myelin antigens CNP, MBP, MOBP, MOG, and PLP (59%), HSP60 and HSP70 (38%), and the 68-kD neurofilament (3%). The antibody response in patients with MS was heterogeneous; CSF antibodies in individual patients reacted with different autoantigens. These autoantibodies were locally synthesized in the CNS and were of the immunoglobulin G class. Finally, we found that treatment with steroids decreased autoantibody reactivity, epitope spreading, and intrathecal autoantibody synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide a new avenue to investigate the local antibody response in the CNS, which may serve as a biomarker to monitor both disease progression and response to therapy in MS.
Authors: William H Robinson; Paulo Fontoura; Byung J Lee; Henry E Neuman de Vegvar; Jennifer Tom; Rosetta Pedotti; Carla D DiGennaro; Dennis J Mitchell; Derek Fong; Peggy P-K Ho; Pedro J Ruiz; Emanual Maverakis; David B Stevens; Claude C A Bernard; Roland Martin; Vijay K Kuchroo; Johannes M van Noort; Claude P Genain; Sandra Amor; Tomas Olsson; Paul J Utz; Hideki Garren; Lawrence Steinman Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2003-08-10 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Kevin C O'Connor; Tanuja Chitnis; Diane E Griffin; Sucheep Piyasirisilp; Amit Bar-Or; Samia Khoury; Kai W Wucherpfennig; David A Hafler Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Dun Zhou; Rajneesh Srivastava; Stefan Nessler; Verena Grummel; Norbert Sommer; Wolfgang Brück; Hans-Peter Hartung; Christine Stadelmann; Bernhard Hemmer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A E Warrington; K Asakura; A J Bieber; B Ciric; V Van Keulen; S V Kaveri; R A Kyle; L R Pease; M Rodriguez Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-06-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: William H Robinson; Carla DiGennaro; Wolfgang Hueber; Brian B Haab; Makoto Kamachi; Erik J Dean; Sylvie Fournel; Derek Fong; Mark C Genovese; Henry E Neuman de Vegvar; Karl Skriner; David L Hirschberg; Robert I Morris; Sylviane Muller; Ger J Pruijn; Walther J van Venrooij; Josef S Smolen; Patrick O Brown; Lawrence Steinman; Paul J Utz Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Anna Corcione; Simona Casazza; Elisa Ferretti; Debora Giunti; Emanuela Zappia; Angela Pistorio; Claudio Gambini; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Antonio Uccelli; Vito Pistoia Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francisco J Quintana; Peter H Hagedorn; Gad Elizur; Yifat Merbl; Eytan Domany; Irun R Cohen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Burcu Ayoglu; Nicholas Mitsios; Ingrid Kockum; Mohsen Khademi; Arash Zandian; Ronald Sjöberg; Björn Forsström; Johan Bredenberg; Izaura Lima Bomfim; Erik Holmgren; Hans Grönlund; André Ortlieb Guerreiro-Cacais; Nada Abdelmagid; Mathias Uhlén; Tim Waterboer; Lars Alfredsson; Jan Mulder; Jochen M Schwenk; Tomas Olsson; Peter Nilsson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Stangel; Sten Fredrikson; Edgar Meinl; Axel Petzold; Olaf Stüve; Hayrettin Tumani Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Ada Yeste; Meghan Nadeau; Evan J Burns; Howard L Weiner; Francisco J Quintana Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jessica E Kenison; Aditi Jhaveri; Zhaorong Li; Nikita Khadse; Emily Tjon; Sara Tezza; Dominika Nowakowska; Agustin Plasencia; Vincent P Stanton; David H Sherr; Francisco J Quintana Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francisco J Quintana; Bonny Patel; Ada Yeste; Mukanthu Nyirenda; Jessica Kenison; Roya Rahbari; Dumitru Fetco; Mohammad Hussain; Julia O'Mahony; Sandra Magalhaes; Melissa McGowan; Trina Johnson; Sathy Rajasekharan; Sridar Narayanan; Douglas L Arnold; Howard L Weiner; Brenda Banwell; Amit Bar-Or Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Keith Van Haren; Beren H Tomooka; Brian A Kidd; Brenda Banwell; Amit Bar-Or; Tanuja Chitnis; Silvia N Tenembaum; Daniela Pohl; Kevin Rostasy; Russell C Dale; Kevin C O'Connor; David A Hafler; Lawrence Steinman; William H Robinson Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Luis Querol; Pamela L Clark; Mary A Bailey; Chris Cotsapas; Anne H Cross; David A Hafler; Steven H Kleinstein; Jae-Yun Lee; Gur Yaari; Simon N Willis; Kevin C O'Connor Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 9.910