Literature DB >> 22262722

Cross-industry standard process for data mining is applicable to the lung cancer surgery domain, improving decision making as well as knowledge and quality management.

Eduardo Rivo1, Javier de la Fuente, Ángel Rivo, Eva García-Fontán, Miguel-Ángel Cañizares, Pedro Gil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of knowledge discovery in database methodology, based upon data mining techniques, to the investigation of lung cancer surgery.
METHODS: According to CRISP 1.0 methodology, a data mining (DM) project was developed on a data warehouse containing records for 501 patients operated on for lung cancer with curative intention. The modelling technique was logistic regression.
RESULTS: The finally selected model presented the following values: sensitivity 9.68%, specificity 100%, global precision 94.02%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 93.98% for a cut-off point set at 0.5. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. The area under the curve (CI 95%) was 0.817 (0.740- 0.893) (p < 0.05). Statistical association with perioperative mortality was found for the following variables [odds ratio (CI 95%)]: age over 70 [2.3822 (1.0338-5.4891)], heart disease [2.4875 (1.0089-6.1334)], peripheral arterial disease [5.7705 (1.9296-17.2570)], pneumonectomy [3.6199 (1.4939-8.7715)] and length of surgery (min) [1.0067 (1.0008-1.0126)].
CONCLUSIONS: The CRISP-DM process model is very suitable for lung cancer surgery analysis, improving decision making as well as knowledge and quality management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22262722     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0764-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  9 in total

1.  BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Prognostic models of thirty-day mortality and morbidity after major pulmonary resection.

Authors:  D H Harpole; M M DeCamp; J Daley; K Hur; C A Oprian; W G Henderson; S F Khuri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  [Pilot benchmarking study of thoracic surgery in Spain: comparison of cases of lung resection and indicators of quality].

Authors:  Gonzalo Varela; Laureano Molins; Julio Astudillo; José María Borro; Emilio Canalís; Jorge Freixinet; Carlos Hernández Ortiz; Florentino Hernando Trancho; José Antonio Maestre
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  [Knowledge identification and management in a surgery department].

Authors:  José Antonio Rodríguez-Montes
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.653

5.  What are the odds?

Authors:  Gary L Grunkemeier; YingXing Wu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  [A model to predict death after lung cancer resection: applicability to individual cases].

Authors:  G Varela; M F Jiménez; N Novoa
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Early complications in surgical treatment of lung cancer: a prospective, multicenter study. Grupo Cooperativo de Carcinoma Broncogénico de la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica.

Authors:  J L Duque; G Ramos; J Castrodeza; J Cerezal; M Castanedo; M G Yuste; F Heras
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Prediction of postoperative morbidity after lung resection using an artificial neural network ensemble.

Authors:  Gustavo Santos-García; Gonzalo Varela; Nuria Novoa; Marcelo F Jiménez
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.326

9.  Applicability of logistic regression (LR) risk modelling to decision making in lung cancer resection.

Authors:  G Varela; N Novoa; M F Jiménez; G Santos
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-03
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Intelligent analysis of acute bed overflow in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.

Authors:  Kiok Liang Teow; Elia El-Darzi; Cynthia Foo; Xin Jin; Joe Sim
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Applying Data Science methods and tools to unveil healthcare use of lung cancer patients in a teaching hospital in Spain.

Authors:  J L Cruz-Bermúdez; C Parejo; F Martínez-Ruíz; J C Sánchez-González; A Ramos Martín-Vegue; A Royuela; A Rodríguez-González; E Menasalvas-Ruiz; M Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Machine learning prediction of combat basic training injury from 3D body shape images.

Authors:  Steven Morse; Kevin Talty; Patrick Kuiper; Michael Scioletti; Steven B Heymsfield; Richard L Atkinson; Diana M Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A data mining based clinical decision support system for survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  Beatriz Pontes; Francisco Núñez; Cristina Rubio; Alberto Moreno; Isabel Nepomuceno; Jesús Moreno; Jon Cacicedo; Juan Manuel Praena-Fernandez; German Antonio Escobar Rodriguez; Carlos Parra; Blas David Delgado León; Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; Felipe Couñago; Jose Riquelme; Jose Luis Lopez Guerra
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.