BACKGROUND: The genetic engineering of T cells through the introduction of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) allows for generation of tumor-targeted T cells. Once expressed by T cells, CARs combine antigen-specificity with T cell activation in a single fusion molecule. Most CARs are comprised of an antigen-binding domain, an extracellular spacer/hinge region, a trans-membrane domain and an intracellular signaling domain resulting in T cell activation after antigen binding. METHODS: We performed a search of the literature regarding tumor immunotherapy using CAR-modified T cells to provide a concise review of this topic. RESULTS: This review aims to focus on the elements of CAR design required for successful application of this technology in cancer immunotherapy. Most notably, proper target antigen selection, co-stimulatory signaling, and the ability of CAR-modified T cells to traffic, persist and retain function after adoptive transfer are required for optimal tumor eradication. Furthermore, recent clinical trials have demonstrated tumor burden and chemotherapy conditioning before adoptive transfer as being critically important for this therapy. Future research into counteracting the suppressive tumor microenvironment and the ability to activate an endogenous anti-tumor response by CAR-modified T cells may enhance the therapeutic potential of this treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, CAR-modified T cell therapy is a highly promising treatment for cancer, having already demonstrated both promising preclinical and clinical results. However, further modification and additional clinical trials will need to be conducted to ultimately optimize the anti-tumor efficacy of this approach.
BACKGROUND: The genetic engineering of T cells through the introduction of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) allows for generation of tumor-targeted T cells. Once expressed by T cells, CARs combine antigen-specificity with T cell activation in a single fusion molecule. Most CARs are comprised of an antigen-binding domain, an extracellular spacer/hinge region, a trans-membrane domain and an intracellular signaling domain resulting in T cell activation after antigen binding. METHODS: We performed a search of the literature regarding tumor immunotherapy using CAR-modified T cells to provide a concise review of this topic. RESULTS: This review aims to focus on the elements of CAR design required for successful application of this technology in cancer immunotherapy. Most notably, proper target antigen selection, co-stimulatory signaling, and the ability of CAR-modified T cells to traffic, persist and retain function after adoptive transfer are required for optimal tumor eradication. Furthermore, recent clinical trials have demonstrated tumor burden and chemotherapy conditioning before adoptive transfer as being critically important for this therapy. Future research into counteracting the suppressive tumor microenvironment and the ability to activate an endogenous anti-tumor response by CAR-modified T cells may enhance the therapeutic potential of this treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, CAR-modified T cell therapy is a highly promising treatment for cancer, having already demonstrated both promising preclinical and clinical results. However, further modification and additional clinical trials will need to be conducted to ultimately optimize the anti-tumor efficacy of this approach.
Authors: Chrystal U Louis; Barbara Savoldo; Gianpietro Dotti; Martin Pule; Eric Yvon; G Doug Myers; Claudia Rossig; Heidi V Russell; Oumar Diouf; Enli Liu; Hao Liu; Meng-Fen Wu; Adrian P Gee; Zhuyong Mei; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop; Malcolm K Brenner Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael H Kershaw; Gang Wang; Jennifer A Westwood; Russell K Pachynski; H Lee Tiffany; Francesco M Marincola; Ena Wang; Howard A Young; Philip M Murphy; Patrick Hwu Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Nicole M Haynes; Joseph A Trapani; Michele W L Teng; Jacob T Jackson; Loretta Cerruti; Stephen M Jane; Michael H Kershaw; Mark J Smyth; Phillip K Darcy Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Cor H J Lamers; Ralph Willemsen; Pascal van Elzakker; Sabine van Steenbergen-Langeveld; Marieke Broertjes; Jeannette Oosterwijk-Wakka; Egbert Oosterwijk; Stefan Sleijfer; Reno Debets; Jan W Gratama Journal: Blood Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Carmine Carpenito; Michael C Milone; Raffit Hassan; Jacqueline C Simonet; Mehdi Lakhal; Megan M Suhoski; Angel Varela-Rohena; Kathleen M Haines; Daniel F Heitjan; Steven M Albelda; Richard G Carroll; James L Riley; Ira Pastan; Carl H June Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott Wilkie; Gianfranco Picco; Julie Foster; David M Davies; Sylvain Julien; Lucienne Cooper; Sefina Arif; Stephen J Mather; Joyce Taylor-Papadimitriou; Joy M Burchell; John Maher Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jacob R Petersburg; Jingjing Shen; Clifford M Csizmar; Katherine A Murphy; Justin Spanier; Kari Gabrielse; Thomas S Griffith; Brian Fife; Carston R Wagner Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Tao Dao; Dmitry Pankov; Andrew Scott; Tatyana Korontsvit; Victoriya Zakhaleva; Yiyang Xu; Jingyi Xiang; Su Yan; Manuel Direito de Morais Guerreiro; Nicholas Veomett; Leonid Dubrovsky; Michael Curcio; Ekaterina Doubrovina; Vladimir Ponomarev; Cheng Liu; Richard J O'Reilly; David A Scheinberg Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 54.908