Literature DB >> 22262422

A multinational assessment of metal-on-metal bearings in hip replacement.

Stephen E Graves1, Alastair Rothwell, Keith Tucker, Joshua J Jacobs, Art Sedrakyan.   

Abstract

There is emerging evidence that many metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings, when used with large femoral heads in conventional hip replacement and some resurfacing prostheses, are associated with increased rates of revision arthroplasty. Registries are the main sources of data on MoM prostheses. At the recent International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries (ICOR) meeting, data were presented from the Australian, England and Wales, and New Zealand registries. All registries reported an increased rate of revision for large femoral head MoM prostheses when prostheses were aggregated compared with the aggregated data of hip prostheses with other bearing surfaces. There was also evidence, however, that the outcome varied, depending on the type of prostheses used, in both large femoral head MoM conventional hip replacement as well as resurfacing hip replacement.The relevance of the recent isolated case reports on systemic metal toxicity was also discussed at the ICOR meeting. Although systemic metal toxicity appears to be a rare occurrence, there is a need to undertake appropriately designed studies to define the true prevalence of this phenomenon. There may be advantages in nesting these studies within registries. The ICOR meeting highlighted the implications of the MoM experience for the orthopaedic industry, regulators, and surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22262422     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  32 in total

1.  Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.

Authors:  James Min-Leong Wong; Yen-Liang Liu; Stephen Graves; Richard de Steiger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement.

Authors:  Patricia D Franklin; Jeroan J Allison; David C Ayers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparative effectiveness of ceramic-on-ceramic implants in stemmed hip replacement: a multinational study of six national and regional registries.

Authors:  Art Sedrakyan; Stephen Graves; Barbara Bordini; Miquel Pons; Leif Havelin; Susan Mehle; Elizabeth Paxton; Thomas Barber; Guy Cafri
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  National and international postmarket research and surveillance implementation: achievements of the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries initiative.

Authors:  Art Sedrakyan; Elizabeth Paxton; Stephen Graves; Rebecca Love; Danica Marinac-Dabic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  What can we learn from AOANJRR 2014 annual report?

Authors:  Tianlong Huang; Wanchun Wang; Daniel George; Xinzhan Mao; Stephen Graves
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-06

7.  Letter to the editor: the withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Joint replacement surgery and the innate immune system.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Yrjo T Konttinen; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2014

9.  Antioxidant impregnated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris particles display increased bone remodeling and a superior osteogenic:osteolytic profile vs. conventional UHMWPE particles in a murine calvaria model.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Nadim J Hallab; Yen-Shuo Liao; Venkat Narayan; Edward M Schwarz; Chao Xie
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Risk factors for early revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chan; Steven Kurtz; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.