PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively whether the findings from the Cornea Donor Study (CDS) led to changes in the transplantation of corneas from older donors. METHODS: Eye banks in United States provided complete data on donor age and placement (domestic or international) for 86,273 corneas from 1998 to 2009. The data were analyzed by 3 periods, preceding CDS (1998-1999), during CDS (2000-2007), and after publication of CDS 5-year results (2008-2009), and separately for corneas placed within versus outside the United States. RESULTS: For corneal tissues transplanted in the United States, the percentage of donors who were 66 years or older increased from 19% before CDS to 21% during CDS and 25% after CDS (P<0.001). Corresponding median (25th-75th percentile) donor ages were 53 (39-63), 54 (41-64), and 57 (46-66), respectively (P<0.001). The opposite trend was observed for corneas distributed outside the United States, with the percentage of donors 66 years and older decreasing from 56% to 42% to 34%, respectively. Donor age trends over time varied by eye bank. CONCLUSIONS: There was a modest overall increase in the donor age of corneas transplanted in the United States from 1998 to 2009, but the retrospective nature of the study limits our ability to attribute this change to the CDS. The modest increases in the donor age of corneas transplanted is a positive finding, but wider acceptance of older corneal donor tissue should be encouraged based on the 5-year evidence generated by the CDS.
PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively whether the findings from the Cornea Donor Study (CDS) led to changes in the transplantation of corneas from older donors. METHODS: Eye banks in United States provided complete data on donor age and placement (domestic or international) for 86,273 corneas from 1998 to 2009. The data were analyzed by 3 periods, preceding CDS (1998-1999), during CDS (2000-2007), and after publication of CDS 5-year results (2008-2009), and separately for corneas placed within versus outside the United States. RESULTS: For corneal tissues transplanted in the United States, the percentage of donors who were 66 years or older increased from 19% before CDS to 21% during CDS and 25% after CDS (P<0.001). Corresponding median (25th-75th percentile) donor ages were 53 (39-63), 54 (41-64), and 57 (46-66), respectively (P<0.001). The opposite trend was observed for corneas distributed outside the United States, with the percentage of donors 66 years and older decreasing from 56% to 42% to 34%, respectively. Donor age trends over time varied by eye bank. CONCLUSIONS: There was a modest overall increase in the donor age of corneas transplanted in the United States from 1998 to 2009, but the retrospective nature of the study limits our ability to attribute this change to the CDS. The modest increases in the donor age of corneas transplanted is a positive finding, but wider acceptance of older cornealdonor tissue should be encouraged based on the 5-year evidence generated by the CDS.
Authors: R W Beck; R L Gal; M J Mannis; E J Holland; H D Cavanagh; G N Foulks; E L Heck; T Lindquist; M S Macsai; R E Smith; W J Stark; R D Stulting; J Sugar Journal: Cornea Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Robin L gal; Mariya Dontchev; Roy W Beck; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Craig Kollman; Steven P Dunn; Ellen L Heck; Jonathan H Lass; Monty M Montoya; Robert L Schultze; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Joel Sugar; Bradley Tennant; David D Verdier Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Joel Sugar; Monty Montoya; Mariya Dontchev; Jean Paul Tanner; Roy Beck; Robin Gal; Shawn Gallagher; Ronald Gaster; Ellen Heck; Edward J Holland; Craig Kollman; Jackie Malling; Mark J Mannis; Jason Woody Journal: Cornea Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jonathan H Lass; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Beth A Benetz; Robin L Gal; Anthony J Aldave; Michelle M Corrigan; Steven P Dunn; Ty L McCall; Sudeep Pramanik; George O Rosenwasser; Kevin W Ross; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier Journal: Cornea Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.651