Literature DB >> 22261587

Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of biologic meshes following colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Charles F Bellows1, Ben Wheatley, Krzysztof Moroz, Stephanie Rosales, Lisa A Morici.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biologic meshes have become increasingly popular for the repair of abdominal wall defects, especially in contaminated sites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histologic and biomechanical properties of biologic mesh in response to a bacterial encounter.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A rat model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection of subcutaneously implanted biologic mesh was used. Samples of biologic meshes [acellular human dermis (ADM) and porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS)] were inoculated with P. aeruginosa (10(5) or 10(9) cfu) or saline as a control prior to wound closure (n = 6 per group). After 10 or 20 d, the meshes were harvested. The recovered meshes were analyzed for histologic changes and bacterial recovery as well as the material strength properties. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) was determined using 1-way analysis of variance or Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS: ADM and SIS colonized with 10(9) cfu P. aeruginosa showed an increased inflammatory response with an associated decrease in neo-vascularization (P < 0.05) at 20 d post-implantation compared with controls. P. aeruginosa had no effect on the tensile strength of ADM, but the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity were reduced for SIS compared with controls at 20 d.
CONCLUSION: Bacterial colonization of ADM and SIS with 10(9)cfu P. aeruginosa negatively effected neovascularization and cellular re-population of the material over time but only SIS showed alterations in their biomechanical properties in response to this gram-negative bacterial challenge.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22261587     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

1.  Improved outcomes in the management of high-risk incisional hernias utilizing biological mesh and soft-tissue reconstruction: a single center experience.

Authors:  J R A Skipworth; S Vyas; L Uppal; D Floyd; A Shankar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Biomaterials: so many choices, so little time. What are the differences?

Authors:  John D Hunter; Jamie A Cannon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

3.  An experimental comparison of the effects of bacterial colonization on biologic and synthetic meshes.

Authors:  William C Cole; Eric M Balent; Pamela C Masella; Lauren N Kajiura; Karen W Matsumoto; Lisa M Pierce
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Bacterial Clearance and Preserve Bioprosthetic Integrity in a Model of Mesh Infection.

Authors:  Erik T Criman; Wendy E Kurata; Karen W Matsumoto; Harry T Aubin; Carmen E Campbell; Lisa M Pierce
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-17

5.  In vivo Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Escherichia coli Infection.

Authors:  Xinsen Xu; Ming Zhan; Xinxing Li; Tao Chen; Linhua Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  Evaluation of a Novel Hybrid Viable Bioprosthetic Mesh in a Model of Mesh Infection.

Authors:  Ally Ha; Erik T Criman; Wendy E Kurata; Karen W Matsumoto; Lisa M Pierce
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-08-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.