Literature DB >> 22260514

A between sex comparison of anterior-posterior knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstrings autograft: a systematic review.

Mark V Paterno1, Ashley M Weed, Timothy E Hewett.   

Abstract

Anterior-posterior (AP) knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may differ between sexes for different graft types. Females may experience an increase in AP knee laxity following an ACL reconstruction with a hamstrings graft, which is not seen in males with a hamstrings graft or in males or females with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft. The hypothesis of this review is sex differences in AP knee laxity and this will be identified in patients who undergo an ACL reconstruction with a hamstrings graft, while no sex differences will be observed in patients who have an ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus. Inclusion criteria were articles published in the English language that studied human subjects who underwent an ACL reconstruction with a BTB or hamstrings autograft, and the presence of a sex comparison on outcome measures including side-to-side difference in AP knee laxity. Methodological quality was assessed using a Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Eleven cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Six investigated sex differences in both hamstrings and BTB grafts. Three only investigated BTB grafts and two only investigated hamstrings grafts. These studies consistently reported increases in AP knee laxity in females after an ACL reconstruction with a hamstrings graft that was not observed in the other cohorts. This systematic review indicates that female patients have greater AP knee laxity following an ACL reconstruction with a hamstrings autograft compared with males with a similar procedure, and both females and males following an ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft. These results are derived from lower level evidence, as no randomized control trials have attempted to answer this question. Future studies need to rigorously address this clinical question to confirm the results currently in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22260514      PMCID: PMC4160038          DOI: 10.2165/11596940-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  47 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction.

Authors:  F H Fu; C H Bennett; C Lattermann; C B Ma
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The efficacy of perturbation training in nonoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation programs for physical active individuals.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-02

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: An outcome analysis comparing gender.

Authors:  J D Ferrari; B R Bach; C A Bush-Joseph; T Wang; J Bojchuk
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  A prospective four- to seven-year follow-up after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Brandsson; E Faxén; J Kartus; R Jerre; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women.

Authors:  F K Noojin; G R Barrett; C W Hartzog; C R Nash
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients.

Authors:  K Eriksson; P Anderberg; P Hamberg; P Olerud; T Wredmark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 7.  Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts.

Authors:  J Kartus; T Movin; J Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group.

Authors:  B D Coleman; K M Khan; N Maffulli; J L Cook; J D Wark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  K Eriksson; P Anderberg; P Hamberg; A C Löfgren; M Bredenberg; I Westman; T Wredmark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

10.  Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  David Jean Biau; Sandrine Katsahian; Jüri Kartus; Arsi Harilainen; Julian A Feller; Matjaz Sajovic; Lars Ejerhed; Stefano Zaffagnini; Martin Röpke; Rémy Nizard
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sex Influences the Biomechanical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Preclinical Large Animal Model.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Braden C Fleming; Benedikt L Proffen; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Validation of porcine knee as a sex-specific model to study human anterior cruciate ligament disorders.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Matthew R Shalvoy; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-rehabilitation research methodological quality: a systematic review with world region comparisons.

Authors:  Artur Proniewicz; Paul Mazzone; John Nyland; Jeff Wera; Justin Givens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Mechanisms, prediction, and prevention of ACL injuries: Cut risk with three sharpened and validated tools.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Mark V Paterno; Carmen E Quatman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Age-related changes in ACL morphology during skeletal growth and maturation are different between females and males.

Authors:  Shayan Hosseinzadeh; Ata M Kiapour
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Effect of Patient Height and Sex on the Patellar Tendon and Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Abigail L Campbell; Jon-Michael E Caldwell; Dheeraj Yalamanchili; Lia Sepanek; Keon Youssefzadeh; Carlos A Uquillas; Orr Limpisvasti
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-03

Review 7.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Sachin Ingole; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-11-13

Review 8.  Top orthopedic sports medicine procedures.

Authors:  Sebastiano Vasta; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Impact of Patient Sex on Clinical Outcomes: Data From an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Xavier M Teitsma; Henk van der Hoeven; Rob Tamminga; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-22

10.  A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Michael J Anderson; William M Browning; Christopher E Urband; Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.