AIMS: Dual-process models imply that alcohol use is related to implicit as well as explicit cognitive processes. Few studies have tested whether both types of processes are related to ad libitum drinking. In a series of three studies, we tested whether both implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions predicted the amount of alcohol consumed in an ad libitum (semi)naturalistic drinking situation. DESIGN: Two experimental studies used trained confederates (same-sex peers) who consumed either alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages, while observing participants' drinking behaviour in a 30-minute session. The third study involved observations of participants' alcohol use during a 45-minute session in which participants spent time with five to seven friends. SETTING: A (semi)naturalistic drinking setting, a laboratory bar. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were undergraduates recruited at Radboud University (study 1: n = 115; study 2: n = 121; study 3: n = 200). MEASUREMENTS: We used coding of drinking behaviour from observations, questionnaire data on positive alcohol expectancies and alcohol use patterns and implicit association tests to assess alcohol associations. FINDINGS: Implicit associations were not related to observed alcohol use, whereas explicit positive expectancies were related positively to observed alcohol use in study 1 and study 2. CONCLUSIONS: Among undergraduate students in (semi)naturalistic drinking settings with peers, implicit alcohol-related cognitions do not predict the amount of alcohol consumed.
AIMS: Dual-process models imply that alcohol use is related to implicit as well as explicit cognitive processes. Few studies have tested whether both types of processes are related to ad libitum drinking. In a series of three studies, we tested whether both implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions predicted the amount of alcohol consumed in an ad libitum (semi)naturalistic drinking situation. DESIGN: Two experimental studies used trained confederates (same-sex peers) who consumed either alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages, while observing participants' drinking behaviour in a 30-minute session. The third study involved observations of participants' alcohol use during a 45-minute session in which participants spent time with five to seven friends. SETTING: A (semi)naturalistic drinking setting, a laboratory bar. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were undergraduates recruited at Radboud University (study 1: n = 115; study 2: n = 121; study 3: n = 200). MEASUREMENTS: We used coding of drinking behaviour from observations, questionnaire data on positive alcohol expectancies and alcohol use patterns and implicit association tests to assess alcohol associations. FINDINGS: Implicit associations were not related to observed alcohol use, whereas explicit positive expectancies were related positively to observed alcohol use in study 1 and study 2. CONCLUSIONS: Among undergraduate students in (semi)naturalistic drinking settings with peers, implicit alcohol-related cognitions do not predict the amount of alcohol consumed.
Authors: Kristen G Anderson; Lauren Brackenbury; Mathias Quackenbush; Morgan Buras; Sandra A Brown; Joseph Price Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Bethany L Stangl; Randi M Schuster; Alyssa Schneider; Alyson Dechert; Kevin W Potter; Maya Hareli; Fahim Mahmud; Elgin R Yalin; Vijay A Ramchandani; Jodi M Gilman Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Sara Pieters; William J Burk; Haske Van der Vorst; Rutger C Engels; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Benjamin C Riordan; Saleh Moradi; Kate B Carey; Tamlin S Conner; Kyungho Jang; Kelly E Reid; Damian Scarf Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-05-15